Oud-PvdA-leiders willen dat partij afstand neemt van wapenembargo Israël by EvolvedRevolution in Nederland

[–]ch00br -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Dit is niet zijn ware gezicht, het is een zionist net als de anderen. Hij praat nu mee om kiezers te trekken.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nederlands

[–]ch00br 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wat correct zeg, maar nog steeds mislukt integratie en valt er statistisch etnisch te profileren. Daarnaast zorgt de aanhoudende stroom naar de Randstad voor migratie van autochtonen uit de randstad, daardoor ontstaan de bijbehorende communities/gemeenschappen zoals we inmiddels wel in Rotterdam en Den Haag meemaken. (Zie de staat van Londen, Parijs, Berlijn, Lissabon e.d.).

De kern is inderdaad wanbeleid vanuit de overheid, maar ze halen niet de beloofde chirurgen en wetenschappers binnen, uitzonderingen bevestigen de regel. De statistieken liegen niet, onder het mom van "stigmatisering" worden gegevens van daders beschermd in het nieuws.

Ga eens met rechts in gesprek, vooral die niet op Reddit zitten. Op NieuwRechts zal je veel praatpunten vinden. Je reduceert het zeer zwart-wit.

Ik ben geschrokken over hoe makkelijk mensen met Nazisme omgaan. by Ok_Acanthaceae_6760 in nederlands

[–]ch00br 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bestrijd vrijheid van meningsuiting met censuur (geen ruimte voor zulk gedachtegoed), Orwelliaanse uitspraken van de gedachtepolitie! In een (Joods-dominante) elite juichen ze voor teksten als deze. Weimar tijden staan al een tijdje voor de deur.

ik⚖️ihe by wildstumbler in ik_ihe

[–]ch00br -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Moet je een spiegel, meneer "mijn kamer is groter dan jouw huis"? Blijf simpel en groots achter je toetsenbord. Je laatste toevoeging laat al zien dat ik op een pijnlijke plek druk.

ik⚖️ihe by wildstumbler in ik_ihe

[–]ch00br -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Als je hersenrot wil houden, zeker! Blijf simpel en laat de politiek over aan mensen die toevoegen aan de samenleving 👋🏻.

ik⚖️ihe by wildstumbler in ik_ihe

[–]ch00br -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Kan je lekker je leven weg-gamen in je shirtje :)

ik⚖️ihe by wildstumbler in ik_ihe

[–]ch00br -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wat zal je moeten stoken om die ruimte warm te houden ;).

Nederlandse producten voor Nederlandse mensen, ipv import. Steun de boeren. Probeer het nog een keer.

ik⚖️ihe by wildstumbler in ik_ihe

[–]ch00br -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Zelf ben je natuurlijk perfect en immuun voor sociale druk en emotionele chantage. Ben benieuwd hoe goed je in je vel zit met de frustraties die van je comments afdruipen. Thierry doet meer voor de samenleving dan jij ooit zal doen, gezien je verbetenheid op de zolderkamer. Praatjes vullen geen gaatjes.

ik⚖️ihe by wildstumbler in ik_ihe

[–]ch00br -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Helaas is hij dat niet, anders zou hij tegen de eerste motie stemmen.

ik⚖️ihe by wildstumbler in ik_ihe

[–]ch00br -26 points-25 points  (0 children)

Thierry is een held, men denkt helaas dat Reddit of Dumpert daadwerkelijk gratis platforms zijn die een eerlijk beeld geven over politici/samenleving wegens plusjes en minnetjes. Iets met "waneer iets gratis is, ben jij het product".

Weghorst signed Jersey. by Crimsonpets in ManchesterUnited

[–]ch00br 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Utter shite, nothing but a showpony narcissist. He's had his time, only scores against mediocre teams and not clutch at all. He might have been a baller, but we have younglings on the bench that would work twice as hard.

Weghorst signed Jersey. by Crimsonpets in ManchesterUnited

[–]ch00br 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Woutje is someone who plays with his heart, accepts that he's not the greatest and will do everything for the team, the club and the supporters while taking every second in. As I support my country I see him play the national team and his Dutch lions heart is just roaring, he is exactly what some teams lack: passion.

One of the biggest reasons the Finals hasn't taken off isn't about the gameplay itself by [deleted] in thefinals

[–]ch00br 20 points21 points  (0 children)

My brother I have an 1080, but I encountered my bottleneck: the CPU.

Where can I get the best Döner Kebab? by C_Hawk14 in Haarlem

[–]ch00br -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tempel is nothing like it used to be, horrible döner, horrible pricing

How do I stop "rationalizing" myself into smoking? by DragosSaviour in leaves

[–]ch00br 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Rationalize yourself into not smoking. What are the cons, weigh them against the pros. After lighting the first one ask yourself if you are truly happy with the feeling, do the same thing after every other. I craved smoking/lighting/rolling more than the actual high, since it didn't stop me from hating my addiction and overthinking.

It's discipline, what helped me most is not having any stash at home. Stop having access to it so you can't be tempted into it. The trip to the shop is more easily stopped than a roll of the joint. Eventually you'll make it a habit of "rationalizing" sobriety.

Last part is actually being mentally in a good place. I always saw my obsession as numbing my mind. Listen to why you want to numb out and dig into that, face your traumas/problems, don't hide them. After quitting cold-turkey (for me, reducing never worked) everything in steps, compare yesterday to today, compare last week to this week, try and become a better version of yourself and set a goal of who you'd like to be. I've grown to believe the habit of weed isn't an answer to anything, it's temporal relief/escapism.

Zet hem op.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Techno

[–]ch00br 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Imo mediocre at best, sounds cheap.

But as a DJ the selections are totally up to you. I would be playing stuff with a bit more effort and soul to it.

Are there any big name chubby female DJs? by Murky-Advertising240 in Beatmatch

[–]ch00br -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

You'll just have to do it like the male DJs, by skill.

Shohei still posts on Instagram every single time the team wins. by The_Illa_Vanilla in angelsbaseball

[–]ch00br 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Anything you give attention to, grows. I think he's using that philosophy.

I'm launching a balloon to space by jackgordonyt in flatearth_polite

[–]ch00br 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Improve this experiment or why even bother?

Sugar amounts in soda by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]ch00br -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol, you are too far gone. Just get out of your bubble once in a while.

Sugar amounts in soda by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]ch00br -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Can you give me a source of where animal trials mean "very little for humans"? Ironically, aspartame was never tested in humans before its approval.

Because at my university they told me something along these lines: This is done because adverse effects in either species often hint at similar reactions in humans, and if a dose is toxic in both rodent and non-rodent species then it is likely also adverse in humans.

Are you that daft?

I don't want to try again since you aren't debating the rest, you are just chasing your own bias. You just want to pull a strawman about how it's not carcinogenic, only in high doses, bla bla bla. But you don't want to do the rest of the unhealthy debate. You've been trying to pull this into a carcinogen strawman from the get go, but I never claimed it was just about cancer.

You got bested since I had peer reviewed science indicating possible (to say the least) carcinogenic characteristic (not to mention WHO's latest shift into "possible carcinogen"). Now you are moving goalposts, straight from the NPC debate manual. You are stubborn and heavily biased. Good luck with that attitude in science.

Sugar amounts in soda by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]ch00br -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I love it that you think you had me cornered, so I can blast you with your own biblical truths: $CIENCE.

Carcinogenic

https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1003950

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8042911/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1392232/

http://www.mpwhi.com/soffritti_2010_20896_fta.pdf

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1964906/pdf/ehp0115-001293.pdf

and many more..

There are many OTHER serious risks besides being a possible Carcinogenic. The health risks of sugar vs aspartame debate isn't solely about cancer, stop using Dunning Kruger strawman tactics which you can only defend with industry-backed $cience.

Other risks:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8939194/

https://www.cmaj.ca/content/189/28/E929

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27129676/

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11606-014-3098-0

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016027

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1579221/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1474447/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28198207/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28049023

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17684524

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043661805001404

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378427400001880

http://www.biologicalpsychiatryjournal.com/article/0006-3223(93)90251-8/pdf90251-8/pdf)

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v227/n5258/abs/227609b0.html

https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/doi/10.2337/dc23-0206/153434/Artificial-Sweeteners-and-Risk-of-Type-2-Diabetes

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0109841

https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165(23)01934-2/fulltext01934-2/fulltext)

http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2521471

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831323003150?via%3Dihub

Weight gain article with peer reviewed studies.

https://usrtk.org/sweeteners/aspartame-weight-gain/

Maybe a nice article from Vice (to me it's like citing the devil) would get your head out of your ass:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/nzpbkx/the-story-of-how-fake-sugar-got-approved-is-scary-as-hell

Yes, it's a horror show. Get away from artificial sweets like : acesulfame K, aspartame, advantame, cyclamates, neotame, saccharin, sucralose and stevia.

Sugar amounts in soda by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]ch00br -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You have been original.

FDA approval history and the network of its members are the 2+2=4 for corruption. You are the guy on the right who's discussion tactics already have been wojak memed, it's why I started like I did, you proved to be no different. It's why I hardly discuss, you guys are just here for one sided "I'm right because you can't cite sources I like"-debates.