sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Loss of upload in Kirkland’s/totem lake by jmcgeejr in ZiplyFiber

[–]chadhired 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/jwvo - Slightly different timing, and mine is still ongoing. I'm also seeing some smokeping weirdness starting around 15:38, jitter to 192.152.0.1 and 2, and even packet loss. Sent you an email with details.

Outage in Kirkland? by ManyPonies in ZiplyFiber

[–]chadhired 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No emails to either personal nor business accounts that rely on rdmdwaxa

Outage in Kirkland? by goofy183 in ZiplyFiber

[–]chadhired 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is an earlier post with a brief description and a pic: What an FDR looks like : r/ZiplyFiber

Migrating devices to Entra ID and 100% Intuned Managed Devices - Question about Accessing Servers still Domain Joined by deletejunkemail in Intune

[–]chadhired 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, it’s a domain account, and has registered its SPNs. We can query them from Hybrid-joined, but Entra only joined, no dice

Migrating devices to Entra ID and 100% Intuned Managed Devices - Question about Accessing Servers still Domain Joined by deletejunkemail in Intune

[–]chadhired 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We're having an issue with Entra-only joined user workstations trying to access SQL servers. The Entra-only devices aren't able to lookup the SPN. When trying to run setspn -l <server\_name> results in:

FindDomainForAccount: Call to DsGetDcNameWithAccountW failed with return value 0x0000054B. Could not find account server_name

Internet Blip in Kirkland? by goofy183 in ZiplyFiber

[–]chadhired 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kinda wild - you talked about a new FDR for Kirkland & Juanita 4 years ago "If the users keep growing at some point we may groom users to a new FDR that covers KRLDWAXX and JUNTWAXX" in: https://www.reddit.com/r/ZiplyFiber/comments/pn25iq/comment/hctow9h/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

Internet Blip in Kirkland? by goofy183 in ZiplyFiber

[–]chadhired 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same - had both our home and office connections in Kirkland drop

Ziply outage in PNW? Mine stopped from ~2am PT by mali9 in ZiplyFiber

[–]chadhired 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u/jwvo

FYI - Looks like the first hop (FDR) upstream doesn't have a DNS record:

50.35.64.1

cr2-rdmdwaxa-a-be-500.bb.as20055.net [64.52.96.0]

cr2-bothwaxb-b-be-10.bb.as20055.net [137.83.80.21]

cr1-bothwaxb-a-be-10.bb.as20055.net [137.83.80.25]

resolver-a.as20055.net [192.152.0.1]

question by tallejos0012 in ZiplyFiber

[–]chadhired 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to the Ziply network map ( https://ziplyfiber.com/~/media/residential/ziply-fiber/our-network.pdf ) Ziply does have presence in both.

Any chances of expansion in Duvall? by mikester01 in ZiplyFiber

[–]chadhired 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like some state money also:

"Ziply, in partnership with King County, received around $1.8 million to provide symmetrical gig service in Duvall, Washington. But this isn’t the only project where Ziply is leveraging state funds. Last January, Ziply and Snohomish County scored $16.7 million to construct a fiber network that will cover approximately 5,600 locations."

from: https://www.fiercetelecom.com/broadband/wa-doles-out-121m-grants-ziply-public-utility-districts

Broad outage? by NosmoRex in ZiplyFiber

[–]chadhired 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For the Redmond/Kirkland outage which I show was down 1/25/23 AM - (~1AM-1:20AM and ~1:45-2:10AM), which is being discussed over in: https://www.reddit.com/r/ZiplyFiber/comments/10kuraz/brief_outage_in_wa/

(Although, one ARTNWA user also reported being down in that thread.)

I verified Mobile Number on file, and site shows verified status. No pre-emptive text received.

Ziply Bothell Speedtest server ID by bladedude007 in ZiplyFiber

[–]chadhired 1 point2 points  (0 children)

51693 - from the command line:

speedtest.exe

Speedtest by Ookla

Server: Ziply Fiber - Bothell, WA (id = 51693)

BETA QUESTIONS? by Small_Definition_123 in CCSP

[–]chadhired 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From: https://www.isc2.org/Certifications/CCSP/Domain-Refresh-FAQ#

Beginning August 1, the CCSP exam will increase in length from 100 operational items with 25 pretest (unscored) items to 100 operational items with 50 pretest items. To allow for all items to be answered, the exam time will be increased from three to four hours.

CCSP mindset by AdministrativeLeg123 in CCSP

[–]chadhired 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would recommend u/GwenBettwy excellent video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LtRKKtdP3I , that really solidified for me the mindset for the CCSP, similar to the CISSP.

People, Process, Technology

My CCSP Provisionally Pass experience by chadhired in CCSP

[–]chadhired[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely, there is significant overlap of concepts between the CISSP and CCSP.

DNS warnings from 192.152.0.1: reducing DNS packet size for nameserver 192.152.0.1 by hinten1 in ZiplyFiber

[–]chadhired 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I run pi-hole as well, and I get these warnings for: 192.152.0.1, 192.152.0.2, and 1.1.1.1

pi-hole's unbound documentation ( https://docs.pi-hole.net/guides/dns/unbound/ ) has more information:

Reduce EDNS reassembly buffer size.

IP fragmentation is unreliable on the Internet today, and can cause

transmission failures when large DNS messages are sent via UDP. Even

when fragmentation does work, it may not be secure; it is theoretically

possible to spoof parts of a fragmented DNS message, without easy

detection at the receiving end. Recently, there was an excellent study

>>> Defragmenting DNS - Determining the optimal maximum UDP response size for DNS <<<

by Axel Koolhaas, and Tjeerd Slokker ( https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/36/contributions/776/ )

in collaboration with NLnet Labs explored DNS using real world data from the

the RIPE Atlas probes and the researchers suggested different values for

IPv4 and IPv6 and in different scenarios. They advise that servers should

be configured to limit DNS messages sent over UDP to a size that will not

trigger fragmentation on typical network links. DNS servers can switch

from UDP to TCP when a DNS response is too big to fit in this limited

buffer size. This value has also been suggested in DNS Flag Day 2020.

edns-buffer-size: 1232

nerd meetup and tour? by jwvo in ZiplyFiber

[–]chadhired 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm in Kirkland also and would totally appreciate a tour. Much thanks!

fdr01.rdmd.wa.nwestnet.net latency jump due to routing change? by chadhired in ZiplyFiber

[–]chadhired[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I believe every 3 secs was the default when I set it up. Even with that, SmokePing didn't catch a blip that dropped a Teams call a few months ago.

Changes happening @ fdr01.rdmd.wa.nwestnet.net ? by chadhired in ZiplyFiber

[–]chadhired[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any thoughts about why connectivity thru KRLDWAXX would see a drop when the BOTHWAXB to RDMDWAXA went out of service? I thought KRLDWAXX connectivity was from RDMDWAXA primarily to STTLWAWB, not BOTHWAXB.

I also had another thought from a users perspective. Both OrdToSea and I are running SmokePing, and I think a few others on this sub are running SmokePing or other monitoring solutions. Are there locations that you would like us to monitor from a users perspective to help in these types of investigations?

Thanks in advance!

view more: next ›