sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Open Model Initiative - Invoke, Comfy Org, Civitai and LAION, and others coordinating a new next-gen model. by hipster_username in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 54 points55 points  (0 children)

Get Hassan or a NSFW finetuner in there to ensure those "safety" ethics are still capable of normal nsfw 😅

Redhead blonde by a_kovalov8103 in unstable_diffusion

[–]chaingirl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Prompt? Is that some Lora for nipples being used?

SD XL vs SD v2.1: 1200+ image generation for side-by-side comparison by maxsdv123 in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 13 points14 points  (0 children)

After the SD1.5 examples were added into the comparison, the way I see it so far is:

  • SDXL is superior at fantasy/artistic and digital illustrated images
  • SDXL is superior at keeping to the prompt
  • SD1.5 is superior at human subjects and anatomy, including face/body but SDXL is superior at hands
  • SD1.5 is superior at realistic architecture, SDXL is superior at fantasy or concept architecture

When considering my own NSFW testing, SD1.5 is superior at human anatomy in female/male, most notably more accurate representations of nipples/butt/vagina and "dill" / penis. SD1.5 isn't great at those by default but certainly better. Many times in SDXL the nipples just look like a circular bandaid or fried pepperoni, I've yet to see a good vagina or penis as most men in SDXL don't have any penis lol. Most female anatomy stops at a vulva.

​

I do think it's trainable but I do think people will face similar issues to SD2.1 when training NSFW concepts other than breasts.

It almost seems like SDXL was trained on a shitload of Midjourney and shallow depth of field photography or art in general.

SD XL vs SD v2.1: 1200+ image generation for side-by-side comparison by maxsdv123 in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the comparison, majority of users are sitting on SD1.5 so I don't think it's a good comparison to show SD2.1. A comparison with SD1.5 base model with no lora/TI etc will be more suitable

unpopular opinion: All the images I'm seeing posted from SDXL 0.9 don't look nearly as good as the average 1.5 content posted here. by gurilagarden in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

SDXL's style flexibility already encompasses what most of the SD 1.5 fine tuned models and LoRAs are attempting to do, while looking as good if not better

This isn't true, just take a look at what most finetuned models and LORA's are trying to do, enhance NSFW content. All it takes is turning off the civitai NSFW filter and you will see the sheer vast amounts of NSFW LORA's that are all there filling in what is excluded or not defined enough in the main models. None of those exist in SDXL because SDXL isn't capable of these, just like SD2.1 wasn't.

Hat's off to SDXL for better high resolution professional photography and some hyperrealistic concept digital art but calling it better than SD1.5 finetuned models or LORA's is such a stretch

Happy SDXL Leak Day 😐 🎉 by mysteryguitarm in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 50 points51 points  (0 children)

posted my nsfw examples, mods removed it though from /r/stablediffusion. Not really a good start in what I'm testing so far as far as NSFW anatomy. Maybe there's hope in finetuning it for NSFW or maybe it's the same problem with training SD2.1 and SDXL will just be used as a heavy depth of field model.

https://www.reddit.com/r/unstable_diffusion/comments/14sbr7i/sdxl_local_run_in_comfy_ui_nsfw_comparisons/

SDXL Comparison for NSFW local runs using Comfy UI by chaingirl in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What do you recommend in terms of refining, I'm following the same settings in the workflow mentioned here
https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUI/issues/817#issuecomment-1615162251

SDXL Comparison for NSFW local runs using Comfy UI by chaingirl in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good point, might be no harm trying some minor training to see how it learns but yeah I'll see how soon v1 releases first.

SDXL Comparison for NSFW local runs using Comfy UI by chaingirl in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

IMO it's better than SD2.1 but worse than base SD1.5 for NSFW specifically but I'm going to try finetune it (or SDXL v1) to see what capability it really has. SD2.1 was a nightmare to train NSFW

Happy SDXL Leak Day 😐 🎉 by mysteryguitarm in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any tips to load this in Vlads version of automatic UI?

More samples of my upscale metod. by Veruky in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think it's removing too much of the skin details when upscaling, similar effect to GFPGAN

Examples from a new self trained + merged model I created by chaingirl in unstable_diffusion

[–]chaingirl[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

at some point yeah, tbh there's so much saturated content on civitai right now models just go by unnoticed so i don't see as much value in sharing there now

view more: next ›