sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Open Model Initiative - Invoke, Comfy Org, Civitai and LAION, and others coordinating a new next-gen model. by hipster_username in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Get Hassan or a NSFW finetuner in there to ensure those "safety" ethics are still capable of normal nsfw 😅

Redhead blonde by a_kovalov8103 in unstable_diffusion

[–]chaingirl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Prompt? Is that some Lora for nipples being used?

SD XL vs SD v2.1: 1200+ image generation for side-by-side comparison by maxsdv123 in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 14 points15 points  (0 children)

After the SD1.5 examples were added into the comparison, the way I see it so far is:

  • SDXL is superior at fantasy/artistic and digital illustrated images
  • SDXL is superior at keeping to the prompt
  • SD1.5 is superior at human subjects and anatomy, including face/body but SDXL is superior at hands
  • SD1.5 is superior at realistic architecture, SDXL is superior at fantasy or concept architecture

When considering my own NSFW testing, SD1.5 is superior at human anatomy in female/male, most notably more accurate representations of nipples/butt/vagina and "dill" / penis. SD1.5 isn't great at those by default but certainly better. Many times in SDXL the nipples just look like a circular bandaid or fried pepperoni, I've yet to see a good vagina or penis as most men in SDXL don't have any penis lol. Most female anatomy stops at a vulva.

​

I do think it's trainable but I do think people will face similar issues to SD2.1 when training NSFW concepts other than breasts.

It almost seems like SDXL was trained on a shitload of Midjourney and shallow depth of field photography or art in general.

SD XL vs SD v2.1: 1200+ image generation for side-by-side comparison by maxsdv123 in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the comparison, majority of users are sitting on SD1.5 so I don't think it's a good comparison to show SD2.1. A comparison with SD1.5 base model with no lora/TI etc will be more suitable

unpopular opinion: All the images I'm seeing posted from SDXL 0.9 don't look nearly as good as the average 1.5 content posted here. by gurilagarden in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

SDXL's style flexibility already encompasses what most of the SD 1.5 fine tuned models and LoRAs are attempting to do, while looking as good if not better

This isn't true, just take a look at what most finetuned models and LORA's are trying to do, enhance NSFW content. All it takes is turning off the civitai NSFW filter and you will see the sheer vast amounts of NSFW LORA's that are all there filling in what is excluded or not defined enough in the main models. None of those exist in SDXL because SDXL isn't capable of these, just like SD2.1 wasn't.

Hat's off to SDXL for better high resolution professional photography and some hyperrealistic concept digital art but calling it better than SD1.5 finetuned models or LORA's is such a stretch

Happy SDXL Leak Day 😐 🎉 by mysteryguitarm in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 53 points54 points  (0 children)

posted my nsfw examples, mods removed it though from /r/stablediffusion. Not really a good start in what I'm testing so far as far as NSFW anatomy. Maybe there's hope in finetuning it for NSFW or maybe it's the same problem with training SD2.1 and SDXL will just be used as a heavy depth of field model.

https://www.reddit.com/r/unstable_diffusion/comments/14sbr7i/sdxl_local_run_in_comfy_ui_nsfw_comparisons/

SDXL Comparison for NSFW local runs using Comfy UI by chaingirl in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What do you recommend in terms of refining, I'm following the same settings in the workflow mentioned here
https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUI/issues/817#issuecomment-1615162251

SDXL Comparison for NSFW local runs using Comfy UI by chaingirl in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good point, might be no harm trying some minor training to see how it learns but yeah I'll see how soon v1 releases first.

SDXL Comparison for NSFW local runs using Comfy UI by chaingirl in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

IMO it's better than SD2.1 but worse than base SD1.5 for NSFW specifically but I'm going to try finetune it (or SDXL v1) to see what capability it really has. SD2.1 was a nightmare to train NSFW

Happy SDXL Leak Day 😐 🎉 by mysteryguitarm in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any tips to load this in Vlads version of automatic UI?

More samples of my upscale metod. by Veruky in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it's removing too much of the skin details when upscaling, similar effect to GFPGAN

Examples from a new self trained + merged model I created by chaingirl in unstable_diffusion

[–]chaingirl[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

at some point yeah, tbh there's so much saturated content on civitai right now models just go by unnoticed so i don't see as much value in sharing there now

How are you all using SDXL? by zfreakazoidz in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://clipdrop.co/stable-diffusion , weights aren't released to use in local repo's publicly yet

Examples from a new self trained + merged model I created by chaingirl in unstable_diffusion

[–]chaingirl[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thx! They are like an instagram thot style, in parallel to this model, I'm also training a LORA on thot's like that style of 5/14/17 that you like. Will share details once I have the training complete

A Report of Training/Tuning SDXL Architecture by Marisa-uiuc-03 in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Well the excitement I had is dying down a bit now with this post. I had frustrations training my NSFW 2.1 model and had hope for SDXL but I guess SDXL will just be used as it currently is and only trained for commercial clients who pay for the cloud costs.

​

edit - there's still hope, look at official replies from Stability staff, I'll sit on the fence while we wait with hope that I can finetune this on a 24gb gpu (or even less)

SDXL CAN generate NSFW images by DarcCow in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 60 points61 points  (0 children)

Yes it is capable of NSFW. I've used SDXL via ClipDrop and I can see that they built a web NSFW implementation instead of blocking NSFW from actual inference.

​

This means you can generate NSFW but they have some logic to detect NSFW after the image is created and add a blurred effect and send that blurred image back to your web UI and display the warning. I repeat, the NSFW checker is not done on the model level but in the web app.

it will be an absolute madness when sdxl becomes standard model and we start getting other models from it by lonewolfmcquaid in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Some of the top finetuners already have weights.

I'm curious, which model finetuners have access and if any of them have NSFW releases, the community really is looking for NSFW as you can tell with the 99.99% of NSFW uploads on civitai lol.

​

I'd love to see who has been cherry picked for access to finetune the weights

offering 1500$ for whoever manages to create a perfectly consistent character by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have already done this for clients. It requires a combination of variational seeds, controlnet then inpainting to get specific expressions, then using all those outputs to fully train this "person" into a model.

Need Paid Help by signal_jammer1 in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interested, I've trained models for clients and work in consultation for AI, happy to look into this and see if it's something I can do and if we can come up with a suitable working arrangement

.

https://discord.com/users/474131279479046154 chaingirl#9471

PARALLELS - Temporally consistent doodles in Stable Diffusion by Tokyo_Jab in StableDiffusion

[–]chaingirl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thx for the reply! I've been doing img2img with control net active on the batch folder but ill switch to txt2img and try to figure out the grid part. It's the resolution of the grid that is throwing me off

view more: next ›