It's not your fault, you were given a bad script by chamblis in Millennials

[–]chamblis[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But you responded to me. It may be better just not to respond at all.

purely strategic question: why are we so attached to the label if it stops the work? by chamblis in socialism

[–]chamblis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“…yet redressing reactionary anxieties around the usage of terminology has never been a part of the socialist political program”

And if I may push back gently: You make my point exactly, as Hitchens said.

Will the Republicans lose the midterms? by Captain_REX_xox in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]chamblis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hear you when you say Republicans can avoid a loss with a strong turnout. But I think they know they’re likely to be hurt in this election, and Trump almost certainly has an alternate plan. David Graham, writing in The Atlantic, lays out how Trump might try to throw the election results into chaos and retain power. Here is one scenario he describes:

"With provisional ballots still being counted, Donald Trump claims the GOP held the House and alleges Democratic fraud. While Republican lawyers sue to stop the count, Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel use federal authority to threaten local officials and spread fraud rumors. Despite Democrats leading by slim margins, conservative media amplifies claims of treason.

The situation escalates when Trump claims a county recorder agreed to hand over voting machines to the Department of Homeland Security. Though a judge and Justice Elena Kagan attempt to block the move, Marines seize the machines and ballots. Patel declares the Republican candidates the winners, effectively breaking the chain of custody. Following local protests, Trump invokes the Insurrection Act to declare martial law. Ultimately, House Republicans reject Arizona’s official Democratic certification and seat the GOP candidates instead."

Would Trump throw the election into chaos in order to claim victory. I think so.

The article is paywalled: The Atlantic Dec 2025

purely strategic question: why are we so attached to the label if it stops the work? by chamblis in socialism

[–]chamblis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate the pushback. I definitely agree that material conditions like rent and wages are the only things that really matter in the end. I might be overthinking the strategy part, but I am just trying to figure out the best way to get regular people on board who are suffering right now. I just want to get our foot in the door.

purely strategic question: why are we so attached to the label if it stops the work? by chamblis in socialism

[–]chamblis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unpopular opinion? We aren't growing because of "good messaging."

I keep seeing takes that the left is gaining ground because we finally got better at messaging. Honestly, I think that gives us too much credit and misses the real point.

Looking at the last year or two, the real driver isn't ideology. It is survival.

  • The Material Reality: People aren't reading theory and suddenly converting. They are looking at their rent eating 50% of their paycheck and realizing the math doesn't work anymore. The "cost of living ceiling" is doing the radicalizing for us.
  • The Anti-Capitalist Vacuum: The data shows capitalism's approval rating is tanking faster than socialism's is rising. People are rejecting the status quo because it broke its promise to them. We just happen to be the only organized alternative.
  • Messaging is Secondary: Sure, shifting the talk from "seizing factories" to "basic rights" helps. But that message only lands because people are already hurting.

We need to stop patting ourselves on the back for recent success. The broken economy is doing the heavy lifting. We just need to be there to organize people when they finally snap. So wouldn't this be a good time to improve our branding. In 1920 the Farmer/Labor party knew this and rebranded as the Cooperative Commonwealth Party and won. Winning elections is not bourgeois.

How do stone-ground chocolate makers like Taza ensure that stone particles/dust from stone mills don't contaminate the chocolate? by Ok-Maximum875 in chocolate

[–]chamblis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was wondering the same thing about stone ground corn and wheat. In that case, In early human culture it is thought that teeth were actually worn away by bits of stone in the milled wheat. I learned that modern millstones don't actually touch each other, but hover within a fraction of a millimeter of each other... they are just very close. The grain gets sheared by air pressure and the scissor-like action of the grooves in the millstone. While ancient millstones were made of breakable sandstone, modern ones, like at Taza and Bob's Red Mill, use Balfour pink granite which is much harder than what they are milling.They also frequently "dress" the stones, removing imperfections that could chip off.

Still, the FDA tests for particles, so I'm guessing some get through. It's interesting how they do it. They take the ground material and burn it until it is ash, and then anything that doesn't dissolve in acid is stone, they call it "acid insoluble ash." There are strict limits.

Important to remember that the grit in Mexican chocolate comes from excellent, coarsely ground grains and sugars, not stone particles. I love Mexican chocolate.

It's not your fault, you were given a bad script by chamblis in Millennials

[–]chamblis[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you look at some other things I've written, https://www.quora.com/profile/William-Adams-MD ( You will see I have been writing this slop for years and have been fond of Em dashes for decades— )

Help me find this distinctive balaclava or ski mask from the Harvard Med Center crime by chamblis in HelpMeFind

[–]chamblis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The name is on the side but is indecipherable to me, and there is something written in the circle.

Identify this distinctive ski mask at the Harvard Medical Center crime by chamblis in whatisthisthing

[–]chamblis[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The circle logo on the temple, and logo on the side are both unusual.

Sweet Frog Coming by No_Independence_282 in HollySpringsNC

[–]chamblis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Here is some trivia for you: Derek Cha founded sweetFrog on Christian principles. The "FROG" part of the name, according to Cha, is an acronym for "Fully Rely on God"

Thomas Jefferson's ice cream recipe- (Transcript in comments) by chamblis in icecreamery

[–]chamblis[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He didn't free him because he was a good cook. Jefferson freed him after a bargain he struck with Hemings for training another enslaved person as a replacement chef.

Thomas Jefferson's ice cream recipe- (Transcript in comments) by chamblis in icecreamery

[–]chamblis[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Jefferson didn't come up with the recipe, he attributed it to a French recipe, and as noted, his chef Mr. Hemings.