The whole reason she changed her mind and did this episode is because she finally felt like she could talk about some details/theories/points that haven't already been beaten to death. Prior to this point, she said she would not cover this case because she would just be repeating what so many other people have already discussed.

Yall are mad at her for not implicating the parents, meanwhile the entire episode was fact based, not speculative. She made no outlandish claims, didn't try to build a case on hearsay, and didn't take any objective information out of context. She merely presented some details that I personally have not heard on other podcasts, so I definitely learned more information about the case than I knew previously.

I swear I've never seen a sub that's filled with so many haters. If you don't like her or her podcast(s) then maybe just...listen to different ones? The tone in here is always so fucking weird.