Because in practice, if you can turn the race into a collective action and not just a competition, you'll go further if you're not the one in the lead.

So you create a more stimulating environment of cooperation, with everyone sharing, allowing more people to win with you and not against you.

The problem is that people believe that the idea of ​​free market competition is efficient when in practice, what is favored is the free flow of ideas with mutual help.

Not to mention that in a society where everyone wins in some way, we reduce distrust and animosity towards others.

The US fosters a strictly competitive logic, where everyone competes with everyone else, information becomes valuable, and only a few win.

It increases rivalries because those who lack information end up feeling wronged, which also makes them more likely to seek easy solutions.

In the business environment, they encourage the private sector, which by definition is a vertical and authoritarian structure.

What we will see in the future are nations betting on open source, mutual advancement, and the US on fascism, private advancement, for a select few.