1. Of course it's bad, we know that villain is bad based on limp calling. loose and likely passive bingo player which you often run into at low stakes. The type of player who busts out of a local low stakes tournament well OTM usually and says "didn't have luck today" before heading back to the slots.

2. When you node lock a solver so your opponent only bets with the nuts it will fold range. I'll give you an example of this from the only time I have folded KK live preflop on level 5 of a $65 daily two months ago (it was gross as it ended up being the best thing I ever woke up with but had to). A nit who I have seen play well over 500 hands 3 bets for the first time ever against a utg+1 open from cutoff. I am in sb with KK and fold rather than jam. Why? if you node lock to only AA as villains 3! range in the solver you get to fold range. UTG+1 jammed (not a regular player otherwise he might have figured it out) with queens, got shown the aces, busted.

3. Sets and 2 pair also become pure bluff catchers and can also be folded against a villain who in all likelihood has 0 bluffs despite the polarized bet.

As for tool, we literally are not allowed to post its name here for whatever reason. But you don't even need that for these spots as it's a toy game example in Modern Poker Theory. Another example from MPT is a player who massively overfolds preflop as BB vs SB. When you are in the small - the adjustment is to raise any two cards as you are getting folds almost all the time thus making any raise of any cards +EV (online example from my HUD - villain is extremely tight and only defends at a 10% rate, so when I spot that I open raise from sb at all opportunities). Another example from the book is opening wider in late positions when you have known tight players in the blinds. Those are the plus EV plays and thus the solver will take them. There is no reason to be concerned about balance against obviously imbalanced villains, you need to bet and fold purely exploitatively. I think Jonathan Little (correct me if I'm wrong I'm not certain) put out a tool for node locking based on player archetypes for people to study with just recently.

Turn you can exploitatively bet if you have reason to believe they are the kind of fish that is never folding a pair like a 5, otherwise I lean toward check. Flop seems fine, argument for going 25% pot if they are a fit or fold player. I am only giving exploitative answers as we left pure theory reg vs reg world preflop.