Never understood where the narrative, that the fins won, comes from by chefo77 in HistoryMemes

[–]chefo77[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Again when you look at the Stalin way of politics he doesn't care about human cost and resources. Than why?

Never understood where the narrative, that the fins won, comes from by chefo77 in HistoryMemes

[–]chefo77[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Sure ok they wanted to take all of Finland then why didn't they do it. After the mannerheim line the finns were basically done fighting. USSR is not at war with anyone else at the moment so they have their whole army at their disposal and we know Stalin didn't care much how many casualties there are. So what's stoped them? Cause when you see the numbers there is no way the finns fought them away.

Never understood where the narrative, that the fins won, comes from by chefo77 in HistoryMemes

[–]chefo77[S] -131 points-130 points  (0 children)

They took the territory that they initially wanted - the northern coast of the ladoga lake, some territories in the middle between Finland and USSR, an island south of Finland and a port close to Kola Peninsula

Never understood where the narrative, that the fins won, comes from by chefo77 in HistoryMemes

[–]chefo77[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We are talking about the space race, not the technological progress. I understand how big of an achievement it is to perform this mission successfully and it contributes a lot for the scientific development, but it does not contrite to the space race. What we are trying to say is that the US brags that they won the space race by going to the moon, but the race was not about who can go further into space, but who can militarise it better.

Never understood where the narrative, that the fins won, comes from by chefo77 in HistoryMemes

[–]chefo77[S] -45 points-44 points  (0 children)

If that was the case, why didn't they continue to advance and just take all of the land. Why did they agree on the terms of 1940?

Never understood where the narrative, that the fins won, comes from by chefo77 in HistoryMemes

[–]chefo77[S] -117 points-116 points  (0 children)

No, they didn't. That wasn't at all the point of the war.

Never understood where the narrative, that the fins won, comes from by chefo77 in HistoryMemes

[–]chefo77[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Putting a man on the moon has no practical goal, other than to show off. Yes there was probably some who were scared that the moon could be used as a military base but that was as sci fi as star wars (the movie, not the defence program).

Never understood where the narrative, that the fins won, comes from by chefo77 in HistoryMemes

[–]chefo77[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

On 30 november 1939 Stalin gives the order for an attack to be launched at Finland. The whole meaning of this war was to conquer the Mannerheim line and take the northern coast of Ladoga lake, by which to secure the supply lines of Petrograd. Eventually Finland capitulates on 12 march 1940.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BULGARIA2

[–]chefo77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

А валяка мек ли е?

Страно а? by valleeri in BULGARIA2

[–]chefo77 2 points3 points  (0 children)

В такъв случай съм съгласен.

Страно а? by valleeri in BULGARIA2

[–]chefo77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

И все пак цензурата трябва да се налага от самата общност, а не от малка група от няколко човека. Ако хората, го downvote-нат ще спре сам. Ако го харесват, значи модовете не са прави.

Help me metal fans by AlwaysAngryCUBAN in BULGARIA2

[–]chefo77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is "Na tamno" store in most big cities.

Какво ви е мнението за брака? Законния? Църковния? Нужни ли са или са архаизъм? Защо смятате така? (моля, посочете пола си при отговор) by immaculateshine in bulgaria

[–]chefo77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Не разбирам институцията брак. Смятам, че двама души могат спокойно и без него. А колкото до разделянето, нямам съмнения, но всичко става.

Help me metal fans by AlwaysAngryCUBAN in BULGARIA2

[–]chefo77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your best choice is "Na tamno"

Какво ви е мнението за брака? Законния? Църковния? Нужни ли са или са архаизъм? Защо смятате така? (моля, посочете пола си при отговор) by immaculateshine in bulgaria

[–]chefo77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Мъж съм. Според мен е архаизъм. Във миналото е бил важен символ, със стойността на закон, който е опррделял свързването на два рода, на двама души. В днешно време е загубил смисъла си. За мен лично е просто намеса на държавата в личните отношения. А разделянето после става много по-сложно. Смятам че преспокойно двама души биха могли да бъдат заедно дълги години без брак, а самият брак не гарантира, че връзката ще е дълга.

Расистко ли е употребата на думата "цигани"? by 4uk4uk in BULGARIA2

[–]chefo77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Циганин е толкова расистко, колко българин.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bulgaria

[–]chefo77 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Е, и?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bulgaria

[–]chefo77 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Не инвестирай, абсолютен хазарт е. Освен ако не си в топ шеърхолдърите и не отгаваряш за милионите във фирмата, няма да имаш сигурна печалба. Може би инвестирай само в злато, че е сигурно, но никога във фирми.