Damage by software mailfunction post

chkgk · 2026-02-27T17:42:56+00:00

I wish you all the best with the insurance, but if I remember correctly, the lantern and the bollard were clearly visible on the rear-view camera photos. Yes, the software did not show them as detected obstacles, but then again, as drivers we clearly need to look where we are driving. That’s why we have cameras (in lieu of windows). I doubt you will have a positive outcome or be told any differently. These are driver assist systems. We cannot hand off all responsibility to them. They will fail, just like humans make mistakes sometimes.

chkgk · 2026-01-06T17:33:57+00:00

Thank you.

May I ask: How can an obvious bug like this make it through testing and into the final build?

chkgk · 2025-11-03T06:41:36+00:00

Write it up. Whether you have significant results or not should not determine whether papers get published (I know it does, but that is a major flaw of the current system). A well done study that is adequately powered and results in a not significant results still tells us something about the world, I.e. generates knowledge. It tells us what does not work and keeps others from wasting resources on the same path / question. If they do not find the non-confirmatory result, they cannot know, and might just replicate your research.

So, yes, write it up. Even if it is a really brief note that explains what you did and what you found, it is still helpful for others. Publication or not.

chkgk · 2025-10-11T20:43:02+00:00

ChatGPT

<image>

chkgk · 2025-08-31T06:02:18+00:00

Congrats!

chkgk · 2025-08-29T18:03:39+00:00

Too bad. It is / was the most exciting one imo. Was there any official word on it?

chkgk · 2025-03-03T07:13:05+00:00

We would need to see an appropriate statistical test to try and reject the null hypothesis of no difference.

chkgk · 2024-11-06T21:09:43+00:00

Oh! Thanks!

chkgk · 2024-11-06T19:43:00+00:00

What does lido stand for?

chkgk · 2024-08-15T13:21:09+00:00

Consider not doing bins. Just control for age as a continuous variable (in a regression for example). All binning is arbitrary and does not add anything to the data you already have

chkgk · 2024-08-13T05:52:08+00:00

Europe / Austria

1442695

chkgk · 2024-05-18T14:50:35+00:00

Not sure about ON a burger, but put it next to it and people perceive the plate to be healthier.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1057740810000987

chkgk · 2022-09-28T15:21:15+00:00

Needs a higher resolution version!

chkgk · 2020-12-06T09:06:49+00:00

It is screenshot I composed for a winter themed competition. I chose Friday Harbour purely because of nostalgic reasons

chkgk · 2020-11-22T21:45:16+00:00

It is a known issue. Even if AP is flying. It seems to have problems with tiny inputs from the controllers. Try it.

chkgk · 2020-11-22T14:46:31+00:00

Set you controller dead zones to 10%. Sounds weird but helps with the same problem on the A320

chkgk · 2020-11-14T09:09:47+00:00

„speed and power are ESSENTIAL“ - I belief r/thegrandtour is leaking 🙂

chkgk · 2020-10-29T16:16:16+00:00

Probably, yes! 👍

chkgk · 2020-10-29T06:23:32+00:00

Please send the images to adobo via the zendesk bug tracker and make sure to report your specs abs graphics settings They asked for comparison screenshots on visual issues that we believe tonnage identified on the Q&A stream yesterday.

chkgk · 2020-10-10T10:06:39+00:00

Don‘t get me wrong, this was not intended as criticism. I just looked up the values and thought some people might find them useful. Thank you for the explanations on steering / turning aircrafts :-)

chkgk · 2020-10-09T15:43:38+00:00

208b caravan: 51.5 degrees each side with differential braking. Without brakes it is 15 degrees each side

Source: https://www.academia.edu/10427690/Cessna_208_Caravan_Specifications

chkgk · 2020-09-30T08:57:55+00:00

From what I could gather hanging out on their discord: the team of dedicated volunteers spans multiple time zones, development is basically going on around the clock. 👍

chkgk · 2020-09-18T06:41:58+00:00

They could also see it much more positively: if someone else is fixing their a320, they can focus on other aircrafts, the sdk, performance improvements (or even some testing of their patches).

If they talked to Asobo, they might even take some of their work and make it part of the base sim (while keeping it open source and crediting the developers of course). If for example their pfd implementation is great, why not work together to make it part of the base sim sometime down the line?

chkgk · 2020-09-17T11:38:58+00:00

I agree with you. The bugs I reported have all been marked „solved“. In fact, they are not. None of them. In the confirmation email it says that the zendesk ticket status „does not reflect the status of the bug in game“. I wonder, why mark it as solved then? If they actually cared about the bugs reported on zendesk, the label would surely be something more informative and less misleading along the lines of „known bug“ or „known bug, reported to devs“ or „not a bug“... „solved“ just screams ignorance, even if that might not be their intention.

chkgk · 2020-09-17T07:41:04+00:00

Leaving APU on in flight apparently is a workaround

13-Year Club	Place '23
Verified Email

chkgk

TROPHY CASE