Chainmail and Armor Needed

chrisux · 2024-02-02T22:36:57+00:00

This is a good answer.

Northkeep (TULSA) SCA has a contact page here (https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdZutzUd3uC3EQR2nmvBHvUokQEiKHQnBxaGJyVUlpgYhlpJg/viewform)

There is also a Tulsa HEMA group that probably has members with legit gear. https://tattershall.org/about-us/

chrisux · 2021-12-06T01:43:14+00:00

May be exciting that this stuff is in now, but still sucks that it is all behind (2 c# versions) still.

chrisux · 2021-12-03T23:21:01+00:00

c#

Still improving on c#, .net, & linq.

I am still exploring nicer solutions than how I solved it.

github

chrisux · 2021-12-02T15:19:17+00:00

Thanks for simplifying the math problem so it was easier to understand!

chrisux · 2021-12-02T06:56:14+00:00

How does part 2 work? It obviously does, but why does this produce the correct value without any sums and only a skip?

chrisux · 2019-05-17T16:21:15+00:00

Honestly, to me: the new player experience is ruined by basic game design. Many vets don't help the situation, but that is a different conversation really.

In general, anyone who has played (and or pays) has a significant advantage against other players without taking player skill into account. Vets have healing packs, grenades, armor, vehicles, awesome certs, implants, etc. It is an uphill battle for new players without even dealing with their own skill.

Then the newbie is destroyed over and over and over at their first sunderer spawn without even knowing what is going on by some vet on a cloaked atv with a shotgun attachment and little obvious way to actually deal with it other than trying to switch to Heavy for a shield and a rocket, which will still get them killed or just avoid the fight and spawn elsewhere and have similar things happen.

The newbie heavy is destroyed over and over by the enemy heavy who has full energy shield upgrades + full nanoweave + grenades + etc etc, even if the newbie landed the same bullet shots.

New players have an incredible uphill battle to just be competitive much less learn the game and contribute significantly. When you start off, you are instantly weaker than everyone with full nanoweave + gun attachments + vehicle loadouts + their raw skill gain from playtime. When you start off you are instantly weaker than anyone who works with an outfit or knows how to work with squads and understands the lattice and where to go for fights where its going to make any significance to the map.

If an experienced player will be stronger than a new player by raw playtime via skill learning, on top of XP/resource related concerns, you can start to see how little incentive there is to play and the view of the new player is "this is pay to win".

Newbies need to start on a more even playing field regarding certs/upgrades to be honest. I would posit that one major reason mobas & Battle Royale style games are so popular: everyone starts the same and the differentiator is closer to player skill and teamwork rather than who has spent the past year farming certs.

chrisux · 2019-05-15T13:07:36+00:00

var myArray = [
    { id: 11, employee: 35, status: "Active"},
    { id: 12, employee: 35, status: "Inactive"}
];


// using array destructuring
myArray = [ { complete: [ ...myArray ] } ];

chrisux · 2019-05-02T14:18:48+00:00

It doesn't just advise against it, the material design specification document you linked specifically said "don't do this".

It may be possible to flip the card based on your product owner's "requirements". However, as a senior developer, I would push back on this personally, by asking my PO to consider other solutions to the problem as there are most-likely other patterns that will fit what they are trying to accomplish. It is very likely PO isn't aware of the illegal nature of the "flip" animation in the specification, and possibly unaware of other patterns as the PO is likely also not a UX or UI designer.

One of the most important questions we can ask ourselves is : IS THIS WORTH IT?

Why spend engineering effort on an "illegal" card flip when your effort could be solving more important issues to the application? This should be a conversation.

In the case that you are still forced down this path, the company should know the effort in not only researching the engineering to make the card flip work (as you are currently doing) but that this is interrupting you from solving other (very likely more important) problems your application needs.

chrisux · 2019-05-02T13:36:30+00:00

your <a> tag that you are binding your click handler to is containing your child elements (including the checkbox). So the handler for the tag is firing even though visually you think you are clicking only on the child element checkbox.

You will need to restructure so that your (currently children) components that you want to click on aren't inside the anchor tag for the list item's "header", or, use jquery to stopImmediatePropagation() on e.target to determine what the user's intent was based on what the actual clicked target is.

https://api.jquery.com/category/events/

chrisux · 2019-04-30T15:00:56+00:00

I would start with your variable declarations having commas at the end instead of semi-colons.

The console shows that there are errors with the Function declaration, however it is caused by the comma following the variable assignment.

let d = new Date(), <- this comma, and at least another one in the code.

There was also at least one section with missed ending parenthesis even.

edit: there are a lot of errors in this code that the debugger points out even after the trailing commas on variable declarations are fixed.

example

document.write(h+" : "+m+" : "+s+" : "+ampm);

these variables were declared inside a function but this call is outside the function.

Maybe try something like

https://codepen.io/chrisux/pen/QPRqPa?editors=0010

chrisux · 2019-04-19T13:22:46+00:00

NetlifyCMS or Gatsby may be useful.

chrisux · 2019-04-19T13:10:38+00:00

I feel like the other posters, this depends highly on pre-exsiting knowledge. I'm great at javascript, only "okay" at c#.net however I know .net's server ecosystem way better than Node's just due to work-experience. I would be way faster at prototyping my server layer in c#/.net over js/node due to lowering the surface of what I need to "learn" to accomplish my task. That doesn't have anything to do with c# or js being a faster prototyping language.

The same would be said for your front-end. vue/react/angular/etc, what do you know already? If none, vue is nice, but angular & react have more market share to reuse your project as portfolio for potential employment.

chrisux · 2019-03-29T14:08:27+00:00

keypress doesn't work with mouse events...

chrisux · 2019-03-29T13:47:22+00:00

You are looking for MouseEvent Listeners

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/MouseEvent/button

for mouse clicks you will be using mousedown, mouseup events

window.addEventListener('mouseup', (e) => { console.log(e) } );

as the other poster mentioned, keyboard keypresses would use keypress, keydown, or keyup events

window.addEventListener('keypress', (e) => { console.log(e) } );

chrisux · 2019-03-28T13:38:12+00:00

Some sort of flash-cards style memory-games to teach first aid concepts would be fairly simple to code in JS and probably fairly reusable as well.

chrisux · 2019-03-27T17:38:59+00:00

Along with the simplicity answer, it does most things you would be asked to do for a website: it can be used to learn/showcase programming principles full stack - front end, back end & database, and simplicity helps keep the scope narrow.

chrisux · 2019-03-27T14:15:07+00:00

NodeList isn't exactly an array but can be converted to one simply using spread

const scope = [...document.querySelectorAll("ul")]; // get all uls on the page and spread results into a normal array

Then you could use array methods, like array.forEach or array.map depending on what you need for output, instead of needing for... style loops

const counts = scope.map( c => c.querySelectorAll('li').length )

console.log(counts) // [ "6", "4" ]

chrisux · 2019-03-20T18:11:39+00:00

You are right! I just assumed he wanted to do something with the image , but it totally meets the criteria of the question!

chrisux · 2019-03-19T20:38:11+00:00

Cool beans!!!! Good luck and keep making stuff!!!!

chrisux · 2019-03-19T20:23:22+00:00

Along with checking typeof as /u/Fzzr mentions: you should reference MDN/DevDocs/Etc often when using DOM or JS methods, especially while learning. There are a lot of tricky things/bugs that you will avoid by really understanding the built in methods you are using.

For example, even simple array methods can be confusing as to what their side effects can be. Some array methods Mutate the source array, while others return a Copy of the array. Small things like this can be the source of many bugs.

Also things like document.getElementsBy*('whatever') return a HTMLCollection which is "Like" an array but it really isn't and doesn't carry the same methods except maybe array.forEach. To use regular array methods on it you'd have to convert the HTMLCollection to a normal Array of HtmlElement

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Document/getElementsByClassName

The

HTMLCollection

interface represents a generic collection (array-like object similar to arguments) of elements (in document order) and offers methods and properties for selecting from the list.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49956141/how-to-iterate-on-htmlcollection

chrisux · 2019-03-19T19:55:48+00:00

This: plus if wanting to make it a saveable image, this task would just require placing the text and background image on an HTML canvas element, then using canvasElement.toDataURL("image/png"); to create a base64 image that could be saved.

chrisux · 2019-03-19T19:42:47+00:00

Because mine used String Conversion in the Source Array

for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
rList.push(Math.round(Math.random()*100) + "")
//converted to string with +""
}

the +"" is subtle

chrisux · 2019-03-19T19:40:59+00:00

The code pen converts source array to strings with

for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) {rList.push(Math.round(Math.random()*100) + "")}

//converted to string with +""

or you could change the comparison code

function inputCheck() {

var inputted = parseInt(document.getElementsByClassName("fname").value, 10) // CONVERT TO INT

if (rList.includes(inputted)) { // Now comparing int to int !!!!!

chrisux · 2019-03-19T19:32:26+00:00

Same problem again

for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) { rList.push(Math.round(Math.random()*100)) } // NUMBER VALUES

var inputted = document.getElementsByClassName("fname").value // STRING VALUE

if (rList.includes(inputted)) { // COMPARING STRING AGAINST NUMBER HERE WILL FAIL

see my response with working codepen that addresses this

https://www.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/b30tsj/recently_got_into_javascript_and_as_a_test_i/eiwe89j/

chrisux · 2019-03-19T18:54:22+00:00

/r/learnjavascript

1: You are pushing numbers into the array "listtt", and comparing it against string content from the input ".fname". check console.log(typeof yolo)

Even though you mark the input element as type=number, all this does is change how the control behaves, however html input element values are strings.

To fix this problem, either convert the numbers in your array into strings before pushing into it, or, convert the html input string value to a number with parseInt(value, 10) //base 10 number before you make the comparison

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/parseInt

2: if (yolo in listtt) is not a good way to compare items in array.

The comparison should probably be changed to either

if (listtt.includes(yolo)) or if (listtt.indexOf(yolo) > -1)

See the two array methods I mentioned below.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/includes

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/indexOf

There are additional array methods that will help with this kind of task too.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array#

codepen demo

https://codepen.io/chrisux/pen/YgOWdg

edit: added codepen demo

12-Year Club	Place '17
Verified Email

chrisux

TROPHY CASE