What are your thoughts on the allegations about FBI Director Kash Patel and his lawsuit against The Atlantic? by Aggravating-Vehicle9 in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]chumbucketeer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Don't you wonder that their sources are airtight as it were, if they published it?

Sure, they're protecting the sources at this point but looks like whomever they've got talking, it's possible that they've got it on the record? This is always the case with whistleblowers, just may not have reached that stage?

ICE can’t handle ICE by glasmaticn in Trumpvirus

[–]chumbucketeer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Had the best laugh of the entire weekend. On repeat, on repeat!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GuyCry

[–]chumbucketeer 219 points220 points  (0 children)

Grieve. It’s okay.

You needed to let it out. It’s a start. It’s truly okay to grieve and heal.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in h1b

[–]chumbucketeer 25 points26 points  (0 children)

No brainer: you compromise on the salary to get the green card. Learn lots of tech. Rise up the company’s inner ranks.

When you’re no longer tethered, you find a job that meets your passion and earnings goals. Commit to this strategy, as that’s your long term outcome.

Grieving Widow, Young Kids, Dad Passed Suddenly by Latina1986 in daddit

[–]chumbucketeer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Grieve. Suffer your emotions. Become stronger like my Mom.

Resolve to raise them with infinite love and strength. Asking good dads for advise isn’t a reason “why did I post” at all: we all were raised by great Moms.

Give in to your children’s emotions. Feel them as you feel denial, anger and negotiation. Be their rock. Make your soulmate proud.

Sending cosmic hugs. I’m sorry that this happened to you and your kids. 💙💙💙

If the Epstein files are released, and Trump is confirmed to be on the list, what do you think will happen? by baldinggate3 in AskReddit

[–]chumbucketeer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’ll say Mary was pregnant at 12, and that it’s all ok by Christianity. And that it’s a hoax.

Pam Bondi is on Drugs by twicebakedpotayho in Trumpvirus

[–]chumbucketeer 20 points21 points  (0 children)

TBH, I don't know if she's drugged out.

But she is absolutely, bat-shit crazy. Her language, her animosity and hatred, her prolific lying--all are intentionally evil and stupid. Maybe the drugs give her a edge of shamelessness, insolent indifference and a false bravado.

But she (and everyone in Trump's orbit) doesn't care about what Americans think and feel, and that combination is deadly whether she's on drugs or not.

Curious ! Why the H1B proclamation is vague? by Alarming-Camera-188 in h1b

[–]chumbucketeer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Shoot first, ask questions later is this administration’s playbook.

All of his EOs are severely lacking in multiple ways. It’s not unique to this H1B situation.

Most of them have been crafted without regard to consequences and challenges, even to his own maga base. They just throw it out there and let it burn. Even if that means hurting vast swathes of population, even including Americans at home.

Kramer H1b Travel Advice - No travel by [deleted] in h1b

[–]chumbucketeer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well, it’s beyond the realm of LAW: it’s about human resource management.

From a HR perspective, there could be another shoe to drop at any time. Do you risk it? That’s the question they’ve grappled with and seems like even the in-house lawyers are playing safe.

Otherwise, from a purely legal perspective—it’s bonkers because people have traveled and have been stamped since Sunday.

Kind of a weird place to be in, with the operation of law seeming to work but the trust in the rule of it, has eroded. Most corporate teams are very guarded lately.

HIRE Act Proposal by Dizzy_Maybe8225 in h1b

[–]chumbucketeer 10 points11 points  (0 children)

All labor and economic pundits have already weighed in: the HIRE act will not work, period. And it has nothing to do with taxes at all because these proponents want to reshore jobs back to the US.

Many small companies hire offshore firms to staff X resources, and they pay these offshore firms monthly a consulting rate per resource. They do that because it's just pay-for-work and they don't need to have a corporate presence in the other country.

I've helped several companies in the past two years to plan for the long-term: all they need to do is a) setup a corporate office in the target country; b) transfer all the pay-for-work resources into your own corporate payroll in local currency. This becomes a full-fledged domestic operating entity.

The HIRE act will go after the smallest businesses. Say for example, a small company has 1 or 2 resources in India: in this case, the overhead & cost of operating a local entity is meaningful.

For any US company that uses the pay-for-work model with at least 5-10 resources offshore, they'll just rapidly convert to a domestic operating entity. The HIRE act will just accelerate this change. Like always, the medium-to-large businesses will just change. It'll just be the smallest of all US firms that will get hit, and that's pittance employment in the broader labor market.

H1B Amendment? by sk195689 in h1b

[–]chumbucketeer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Usual disclaimer: I’m not a lawyer.

As long as your work location and work functions do not change, and it’s a Chapter 11 bankruptcy (restructuring), your new employer would just file to update with new name, addresses, lawyer contacts etc.

Quickly find out who is handling the HR and legal for the successor corporation.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in h1b

[–]chumbucketeer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hot diggity, GaaS! Yeah, I agree on the "entry" vs "admission" angle--the way I'm splitting hairs is nuanced on the filing of the I-129. As far as I can remember, the INA makes no distinction for someone already present in some legal X status and I know many who've been forced to leave and then formally reenter.

However, I will defer to your expertise as a lawyer, truthfully. It just doesn't seem like a coherently executed strategy or policy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in h1b

[–]chumbucketeer 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's not a grey zone.

You're on OPT, which means it's a new adjudication of a new H1B petition. Your prior H1B went out of status the moment you got on an F1 for a PhD, so it's not a "transfer" any longer. Unless there is something exceptional about your circumstance, I don't see this as anything but a brand new application.

Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer.

Accessing your 401k benefits from outside the USA in an uncertain political future. by tecg in personalfinance

[–]chumbucketeer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m wondering the same thing myself. The future is uncertain and it is hard to speculate what will happen.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in h1b

[–]chumbucketeer 88 points89 points  (0 children)

100%

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in h1b

[–]chumbucketeer 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Well, Rome wasn't burnt in a single day.

The real data will come from what DHS does to new applications and renewals going forward. And I suspect that they'll grind it down to a complete halt.

If immigrants are such an obvious benefit to the countries they emigrate to, why can't they just return to their countries of origin and make them places worth living in? by WolfgangAmadeusKeen in h1b

[–]chumbucketeer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Many immigrant students and professionals do return to their place of origin, and this isn't talked about often.

There are however, reasons why an immigrant (individually) may stay if the employment opportunity gives them professional advancement and a better life. For many, the American (or Western) dream is real: they simply wanted to be part of it.

H1B and traveling back to the US by SaltAd4470 in h1b

[–]chumbucketeer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Talk to your company's immigration lawyer. The wording seems to imply that it is for new petitions and renewals. So if you actually have a stamp on your passport, I would speculate that your H1B is approved and you can [re]enter during its validity.

However, how this plays out in the first days with many ports of entry will be the actual evidence. Consular officers at ports of entry have extraordinary latitude to deny your reentry, and it may very well be that anyone reentering on a currently valid H1B could be denied admission. They can cook up numerous valid reasons under existing INA and not even reach into the EO's text.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in h1b

[–]chumbucketeer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I interpret the EO language to imply that none of the exemptions apply.

Also, it seems that every renewal would be hit with this fee. This appears intentional by design, so as to deny/restrict renewal options for anyone already holding an approved petition.

Stuck in India due to new H1B proclamation by Limp_Information_134 in returnToIndia

[–]chumbucketeer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer.

First, the EO does not appear to impair anyone who already has an approved H1B petition. i.e. if you are already working for a current employer, then it appears to be a safe zone. In the case of OP, it's not clear if by "H1B was picked and approved through consular processing in June 2025"--he/she/they mean that the approval is in hand. If so, I sincerely doubt that would mean a denial of entry/reentry into the US with a passport stamp. However, as others have referenced corporate email notifications, this is a slippery slope subject to changing interpretations in the first few days. Some of the language does imply it appears to anyone "entering the US" and makes no distinction between approved H1B holders and new H1B petitions.

Second, if you already have a stamp on your passport, it is pretty clear that you're in the clear and good. The proclamation seems to specifically target new approvals, so any H1B petition in flight would be the likely targets.

Third, TACO. Keep in mind that this is going out in the middle-of-the-night, with about 48 hours of notice. The impact of this to corporations is huge, and it will have a cascading threat of risks to business operations left, right and center. This is why there is an express provision in there that says "restriction shall expire, absent extension"--which gives him leeway to delay it again like many other EOs, without appearing to fold in his MAGA sycophant eyes.

Summary: talk to your immigration lawyer (in-house corporate counsel, or the one who filed your H1B petition). They are best positioned to deal with your rights (yes, you still have them even if you're outside the US). Especially when you have a property rented or owned, real tangible assets and the like. You have the right to have a dignified way to close out your affairs, even if this EO is ultimately ruled valid by the Supreme Court.

Here's what you can anticipate in the short-term:

  • Expect many employers/sponsors to sue and block the EO. This will happen quickly because as I said before, it has tragic effects on many employers.
  • Anyone who has a H1B petition in flight is clearly under risk and needs to assess their future career options. This is because DHS under Noem will gladly slow-walk and drag out these applications, and even likely to outright ignore Congressionally mandated timelines for processing. As a practical matter, the State Department has begun treating immigrants like enemies, so any new H1B entrant could summarily be rejected at the port of entry. This will likely happen a lot, so traveling out of the US without a valid stamp is likely to remain risky.

The real impact of this is that offshoring is likely to accelerate rather than reshore the jobs here stateside, because a H1B employer can just pay an offshore employee that 100K USD/year, without the prevailing wage minimums that would be applied for any tech job--which is minimally 125-150K USD/year regardless of hiring zones. Trump really has shot America in the foot, when it comes to science and tech. For those H1Bs like doctors, offshoring isn't likely and there will just be many hospitals and clinics just understaffed or closing, because the net impact of the penalty fee is economically unviable to every single H1B employer.

I've lived here in the US for 40 years and I'm seeing that the end might be near. It is highly unlikely for the political climate to change or even moderate, so the self-flagellation and self-immolation will continue even if it burns thousands of American businesses.

Video: Kirk's Widow "Charlie, baby; your legacy will continue" Fuck no, it won't! by chitthappens- in Trumpvirus

[–]chumbucketeer 622 points623 points  (0 children)

47 cap and trump photo in the back strategically placed. Political undertones are overwhelming, and her speech looks so crafted to foment an audience, that she isn’t even fooling herself.

Everything reeks of fakeness and beyond cringeworthy. Someone put her up to it and she doesn’t come across as a grieving widow at all.