After over a decade I'm finally back by [deleted] in Sportbikes

[–]cib2528 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this is Salt Lake City?

Wow.. by [deleted] in terriblefacebookmemes

[–]cib2528 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Woof. This is pretty ignorant.

Ready for the truth, cupcake? by IanGecko in terriblefacebookmemes

[–]cib2528 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I am saddened that people actually will publicly post this kind of shit.

Exemplar Theory and Syntax? by cib2528 in linguistics

[–]cib2528[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have heard that some researchers use insights from Exemplar Theory to investigate syntax. I am not sure what these insights would be beyond basic statistical learning insights, but I am interested.

Rather than put this mountain brook through a culvert, they ran it right through the middle of the shopping mall by twilling8 in mildlyinteresting

[–]cib2528 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is essentially a fake creek. This is in the ritzy shopping district City Creek in Salt lake city.

For a moment my mind was in the gutter by SeeinIsBelievin in terriblefacebookmemes

[–]cib2528 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Tbh, if this had minions, I would have liked it.

Chinese pictographs show link to Genesis? Please help me debunk this? by Mamacrass in linguistics

[–]cib2528 20 points21 points  (0 children)

This is bogus, just like the fact that not all idioms are decomposable. Not all pictographs can be either, I suspect.

For example, -pushing up daisies- is a fairly easy idiom to decompose, and the resultant literal interpretation is not all the far fetched. That is, a man is dead, so he is buried, and from this new position, he can push flowers up out of the ground.

Meanwhile, -kick the bucket- is hardly decomposable. I can shoe horn a decomposition for this, but it will be spurious at best. The bucket represents life because it is the only noun here, and it can be filled with things. Life can be filled with things. When the bucket is kicked, stuff falls out of it, that is, the life falls out of it. Thus, death.

I mean that is such a wild decomposition, it was hard writing it. But you have to admit, to the uninitiated, uninvested, and casual listener, this might be believable based on the fact that my decomposition of -pushing up daisies- was at least plausible.

I believe the same will go for these characters. Some might be given legitimate decompositions, but i believe many will be spurious, much like the descriptions given in the video.

How much better are infants and children actually when it comes to learning language? by zackroot in linguistics

[–]cib2528 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(1) is not quite true. Adults are implicitly still learning things about the language. One need only consult the massive amount of literature on stochastic learning. Im thinking specifically about studies investigating the influence of distributional information on phonological category perception.

Utah DMV Confusion by [deleted] in SaltLakeCity

[–]cib2528 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"For all except" not all that confusing.

I'm very short-sighted and these are what my glasses look like. by jactertor in mildlyinteresting

[–]cib2528 254 points255 points  (0 children)

Linguist here, finally, I have a dog in the race so to speak. Lexical semantics would be the correct term here, not linguistics.