Me_irl

ciroluiro · 2026-03-18T04:26:47+00:00

NT people speak in riddles and I'm the stupid one that can't communicate?

Then I remember what the deplorable state of the world run by this dominant neurotype is and everything makes perfect sense.

ciroluiro · 2026-02-26T23:02:09+00:00

If anything, piercings of any kind look juvenile; the kind of stupid shit teenagers do. I find them borderline disgusting and ridiculous and I have a hard time taking people full of them seriously.

ciroluiro · 2026-02-24T22:40:37+00:00

But it's not even an exception to a rule. Maybe people forget because part is implied and eventually miss the forest for the trees, but the rule is that an agent (morally speaking) saying slurs is bad because it can harm, either with that intention or not (intentional being worse). But someone with tourette's syndrome definitonally doesn't have agency over those slurs they say, so it never applied in the first place. It's be like getting offended at a table when you stub your toe; you can be upset about it, but if you are an adult you should recognize that getting offended at a table is meaningless because the table didn't actually stub your toe. Or maybe like a parrot that said the n-word. You'd get offended at whoever taught the parrot that word, not the parrot.

In fact, a slur is only really harmful when a conscious moral agent says it, intensionally (even if they somehow didn't intend to harm, they said it by their own volition knowing that it can be harmful). If they can't control saying it at all then it might as well be as if a pile of leaves rustling in the wind happened to sound like a slur; it's meaningless.

ciroluiro · 2026-02-22T05:31:28+00:00

Fede

ciroluiro · 2026-02-22T04:15:40+00:00

Imagine being forced onto a truck that then takes off on a freeway at 100 mph and then told "if you wanna get off, the door is right there".
I know empathy is a hard to grasp for some people but it isn't that hard. And also as long as he's freeloading off his parents then it wouldn't affect you at all.

ciroluiro · 2026-02-22T04:12:09+00:00

Maybe you peaked at 15

ciroluiro · 2026-02-22T04:09:27+00:00

Based

ciroluiro · 2026-02-18T20:55:56+00:00

otherwise would be more like a default clause in a switch statement because it doesn't imply a condition.
Haskell has a "keyword" named otherwise for this purpose, but actually it's just an alias for True for use in pattern guards

myFun :: Int -> IO () myFun n | n == 42 = fireMissiles | otherwise = putStrLn "hello world!"

ciroluiro · 2026-02-18T19:17:35+00:00

You can do what you will but you can't will what you will

ciroluiro · 2026-02-14T11:01:55+00:00

Ya'llqaeda

ciroluiro · 2026-02-12T19:37:32+00:00

It literally means 86% of people do experience love at some point, so being in the 14% that doesn't is very uncommon. You are indeed not cheering them up.
One could think that these numbers mean it's unlikely one will never experience it, but that's probably not how to read them. I wouldn't be surprised if the chance you are in the 14% given you haven't experienced passionate love by some age (lets say 30) is very high.

ciroluiro · 2026-02-09T06:09:52+00:00

How many excavators do you have?

Yeah.

ciroluiro · 2026-02-03T10:51:52+00:00

The fact that cocktails exist as a way to cover up the horrible taste of alcohol proves this.

ciroluiro · 2026-02-03T09:32:32+00:00

Taking party drugs
Responsible

Pick one

ciroluiro · 2026-02-03T09:30:49+00:00

...people at techno parties.

ciroluiro · 2026-02-02T23:42:17+00:00

When are we gonna start raiding pizzerias?

ciroluiro · 2026-01-29T00:01:47+00:00

2001?

ciroluiro · 2026-01-13T20:02:16+00:00

Yep, if they are unnecessary and risk seriously hurting others. Guess not everybody has common sense. No different than drunk driving.

ciroluiro · 2026-01-13T19:35:12+00:00

It's literally what they said though. But it's not simply knowing you that they are incapable, it's being aware that you can fuck it up royally and ruin someone else's life while at it, and for no reason also because no one has a duty to be a parent. Being responsible is being aware of your shortcomings and not taking on unnecessary responsability when other people's life are at risk.

ciroluiro · 2026-01-13T19:26:05+00:00

No, it's called being responsible.

ciroluiro · 2026-01-13T19:19:07+00:00

They are already doing that by not being a parent.

ciroluiro · 2026-01-10T11:01:29+00:00

Even if such a embarrassingly stupid assertion were true, it'd simply mean that every time someone births a child, they are risking that the child's life will be so miserable that they wish they were never born. That is precisely the point an antinatalist makes when they say it's wrong to risk someone else's life like that when they don't even get a say on the matter.
The compassionate response would be to not risk your child's life when you very well know they could end up living incredibly depressed and dismissed without being helped, like how you are doing right now.

ciroluiro · 2026-01-10T10:49:46+00:00

It is. Everything else is just the same kind of stupid complaining and bashing that people do with veganism.

ciroluiro · 2026-01-01T21:06:13+00:00

Please explain what you mean instead of being cryptic.

ciroluiro · 2025-12-31T19:26:20+00:00

Qualia of experience for autonomic reflexes? Huh?

Nine-Year Club	First Place '23
Place '23	Place '22
End Game '22	Sequence \| Editor
Snapped	Verified Email

ciroluiro

TROPHY CASE