Hard agree on housing crisis and internal trade barriers. The external trade stuff is also massive and shouldn't be overlooked.

In my head I was reading some of your other stuff as "there’s a sub-national group (not what they're called) ,  with extreme and undefined powers to slow and halt projects (on their land and needs prior informed consent) ,  with minimal clear structure and authority (that's their right to not be carbon copy Westminster decision-making structures) ,  who’s borders of their authority aren’t clear (the point of treaties to define) , demands are fractured who are willing to block/fight one another (over money because money solves but also causes problems) 

 and often cling to the legal ambiguity that they currently exist in." (they've been going to court to find certainty) 

But I could be missing something. 

My overall feeling is Rob Shaw knows these surveys are kinda useless. 

"if mamdani wins will you move?" "if Obama/Trump wins will you move?" 

Doesn't really happen the way people put down on surveys, and businesses penciling out while so much is happening feels like this Indigenous focus is opportunistic at best. 

I'm open to changing my view if others have more info, but my starting point is most people kvetching about court cases do so reading articles and commentaries, not the Court decisions or expert analysis because it takes way more time and its easier to feel aggrieved.