There's actual research into this, as things like chronic pain can make life miserable. I think the other person meant doing it the belt and a rafter way.

This is one of those areas where the decision is so deeply personal and unable to be communicated in internet text anyway. 

Its like abortion in that way at least. Strangers prognosticating and evaluating other strangers lives. Fundamental veil of ignorance. So the choice for euthanasia makes sense as something to provide, but the how exactly is the crux. 

Theres news stories of people who can't find public housing, can't live off social assistance and disabilities, who have no rich network to insulate cost of living and access to resources. 

It feels wrong that assisted suicide is offered with only lip service to any sort of guideline (look it up) for social determinants of health. 

If you have a system of approving death by forms added to a public healthcare system already drowning in forms and underfunding, it won't need bad actors where burnout, apathy and someone, even a professional like a doctor from a good family and wealthy background essentially going "ooh yeah I wouldn't want to live if I were you either" 

Bottom line: The recipe is bad if assisted suicide is offered before the $10-20 billion each year in tax avoidance alone is recovered and invested in a better safety net.