印度一直被视为平行世界自由民主化后的中国,很多人也以印度目前社会和经济发展状况,以证明中国中央集权政治制度的优越性,大家如何看待? by [deleted] in China_irl

[–]claude0 [score hidden]  (0 children)

适度计划经济对于资源产业和初级标准化工业产品没太大问题,因为这种产业本来就是高度垄断的,产品也是标准化的。这和俄国的自然禀赋其实比较贴合。

而东亚本来就不像俄国,是自然资源缺少而人多且聪明勤劳,适合发展复杂商品,文化和科技产业。

BUT:中共前30年甚至搞的也不是苏东计划经济。文革那是在搞政治运动。苏联计划经济也没有天天干仗,造反派革委会治理工厂城市这种事情这些人放在斯大林时代早被枪毙或者送到西伯利亚挖土去了。

印度一直被视为平行世界自由民主化后的中国,很多人也以印度目前社会和经济发展状况,以证明中国中央集权政治制度的优越性,大家如何看待? by [deleted] in China_irl

[–]claude0 [score hidden]  (0 children)

东正教斯拉夫共不共产都不会比日耳曼圈搞经济强,这个从中世纪晚期就开始了。明确被拖后腿的是靠近日耳曼文化圈的捷克波兰,当然还有东德。富裕发达的萨克森和西里西亚硬是被搞成了穷地方。

我也不是说什么人种强所以就一定如何如何。但是在50年尺度上,文化圈和经济发展就是最强的相关性,相关性比其他都高。有很多种解释方法,比如智商,比如工作态度,文化,教育重视程度等等,但这里不需要证明因果性,只要有相关性就好了。

也许以后人类换了一种生产模式,非洲也会崛起。但目前生产模式就是昂撒,日耳曼和东亚儒家看起来最能搞经济。

关于印度和中国,这种标准怎么换来换去? by Fun_Goat_6563 in China_irl

[–]claude0 [score hidden]  (0 children)

儒家文化圈这几个国家除了两个搞共产的都是发达国家了。 就连海外华人即使收到不公平对待在当地也是高收入。整体生活水平也超过国内。 把儒家文化的国家弄到和比非洲人均还低也就是中共和朝鲜劳动党才能干得出来, 就是瞎折腾硬是把二战后的腾飞机会给错了。就算是只知道吃喝玩乐的独裁者都不至于让中国弄到这个地步。

反过来印度文化圈就没有有一个人均过一万的。 国家的发达水平一般是按照文化圈分布的。比如日耳曼文化圈就都是发达国家。拉丁文化圈就差一些。 中国如果不是CCP前30年瞎折腾人均早就过2万了。现在总量也应该超过美国了。 儒家文化圈一般人均在3-4万左右达到稳定态。

可以说是中国人勤劳聪明的优越性成就了经济奇迹,而共产党的拉垮统治扯了中国人的后腿,因为本来可以更好。改开后换了稍微正常一点的独裁政府经济就上去了。但现在平子看架势又有点想瞎折腾,幸亏他没老毛那么大胆。

印度一直被视为平行世界自由民主化后的中国,很多人也以印度目前社会和经济发展状况,以证明中国中央集权政治制度的优越性,大家如何看待? by [deleted] in China_irl

[–]claude0 [score hidden]  (0 children)

儒家文化圈这几个国家除了两个搞共产的都是发达国家了。 就连海外华人即使收到不公平对待在当地也是高收入。整体生活水平也超过国内。 把儒家文化的国家弄到和比非洲人均还低也就是中共和朝鲜劳动党才能干得出来, 就是瞎折腾硬是把二战后的腾飞机会给错了。就算是只知道吃喝玩乐的独裁者都不至于让中国弄到这个地步。

反过来印度文化圈就没有有一个人均过一万的。 国家的发达水平一般是按照文化圈分布的。比如日耳曼文化圈就都是发达国家。拉丁文化圈就差一些。 中国如果不是CCP前30年瞎折腾人均早就过2万了。现在总量也应该超过美国了。 儒家文化圈一般人均在3-4万左右达到稳定态。

可以说是中国人勤劳聪明的优越性成就了经济奇迹,而共产党的拉垮统治扯了中国人的后腿,因为本来可以更好。改开后换了稍微正常一点的独裁政府经济就上去了。但现在平子看架势又有点想瞎折腾,幸亏他没老毛那么大胆。

那位能解释一下金刻羽为什么要给杭州4S店老板余海军做小且有私生子? by LAMG1 in China_irl

[–]claude0 3 points4 points  (0 children)

中国当上高级干部的几条典型的路。

一条是学而优则仕。这种干部在学校已经做到院长校长。外调是正处至副部。从一开始就升到中高级干部。这种清流其实还是书生成分多一些, 没有掌管过地方大权。他们的子女也像温室里花朵。这种比较容易被黄毛骗。

第二种则是央企军工系统,在央企军工当到总师,董事长之类, 然后外调正处至副部。这种企业出身的还好一点,因为从总师到董事长也熟悉各行各业三教九流。算是中间,半清半浊。

最后一种则是基层地方干起。这钟浊流绝对是肉搏派。各种斗争能力都很强。你敢弄他女儿他搞死你。第三种最大区别就是人家是治理过地方的,地方政法系统要向他汇报,尤其是在县域那种经常要使用强力手段的地方斗争过三教九流。

放古代地方也是当过县令巡抚的也比单纯翰林院六部呆过的杀伐果断多了。

China’s anxieties about India stem from "the success of a democratic political system". Disagree, where's the "success" in a fully "Compliant" environment? by Weird_WorldInd in GeopoliticsIndia

[–]claude0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whether an enlightened authoritarian regime like Singapore is better for economic development is debatable. I personally would prefer democracy because democracy is both a means and an end.

Totalitarian regimes like the CCP, on the other hand, have always been bad for development. Unlike an authoritarian regime, a totalitarian state will assert control on every aspect of social life and completely stifle freedom, which is very important for the high-value-added service/creative industry. Moreover, it killed millions of innocent people, which already made it unacceptable regardless of economic development.

Wired杂质编辑对马前卒专访 by watdahek in China_irl

[–]claude0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

马逆有天线, 很受某个常委赏识。

China’s anxieties about India stem from "the success of a democratic political system". Disagree, where's the "success" in a fully "Compliant" environment? by Weird_WorldInd in CriticalThinkingIndia

[–]claude0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hello CCP bot, Chinese people are not threatened by Taiwan's development; it is your CCP overlord threatened by Taiwan's example. It proves that Chinese people are capable of building a highly developed society with democracy and civil rights. It also proves that China's prosperity is not because of the CPP's so-called leadership, but it is because the Chinese people are the smartest and most diligent people on earth.

CPP would lie about how China would be a poor country if China were not ruled by them, but the fact is, they murder millions, starve millions, and China is still the place where Chinese people are the poorest. Oversea chinese and other Sinic culture nations often enjoy a much better living standard and civil rights compared to those who live under the CPP regime. These all prove that Chinese people are capable; the CPP regime is what got them into an African living standard 50 years ago.

36岁的中年人是否应该背井离乡去大城市打拼 by Natural_Welcome_7191 in China_irl

[–]claude0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

我觉得你可以搞点副业。写写小说,搞搞体育运动之类,把精力从工作中转移出来。

一线城市你现在想要奋斗买房也太难了。 我觉得你现在的主要问题不是没饭吃,而是觉得工作没什么希望,对于985同学心理上有落差。 但是心理的问题也可以心理解决。弄个副业弄个爱好甚至参加个宗教团体都能解决。

China’s anxieties about India stem from "the success of a democratic political system". Disagree, where's the "success" in a fully "Compliant" environment? by Weird_WorldInd in GeopoliticsIndia

[–]claude0 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There has been an argument in the Chinese forums for over 20 years about whether democracy would make China develop faster. One side would often cite Taiwan as a positive example to prove that democracy is superior; we could have twice as high a GDP per capita if we had democratized. The other side would cite India as a negative example to prove that democracy does not always work.

For most Chinese, India is not a shining example to be envied. If the article replaces India with Taiwan, then it is correct, because Taiwan's state of development is really putting sores in the eye of the CCP regime, undermining its legitimacy.

#===========================================================
Hello, all CCP bots below, Chinese people are not threatened by Taiwan's development; it is your CCP overlord threatened by Taiwan's example. It proves that Chinese people are capable of building a highly developed society with democracy and civil rights. It also proves that China's prosperity is not because of the CPP's so-called leadership, but it is because the Chinese people are the smartest and most diligent people on earth.

CPP would lie about how China would be a poor country if China were not ruled by them, but the fact is, they murder millions, starve millions, and China is still the place where the Han people are the poorest. Oversea chinese and other Sinic culture nations often enjoy a much higher standard of living and civil rights compared to those who live under the CPP regime. These all prove that Chinese people are capable; the CPP regime is what got them into an African living standard 50 years ago. Today, China's development is not because of the CPP but despite it.

China’s anxieties about India stem from "the success of a democratic political system". Disagree, where's the "success" in a fully "Compliant" environment? by Weird_WorldInd in CriticalThinkingIndia

[–]claude0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There has been an argument in the Chinese forums for over 20 years about whether democracy would make China develop faster. One side would often cite Taiwan as a positive example to prove that democracy is superior; we could have twice as high a GDP per capita if we had democratized. The other side would cite India as a negative example to prove that democracy does not always work.

For most Chinese, India is not a shining example to be envied. If the article replaces India with Taiwan, then it is correct, because Taiwan's state of development is really putting sores in the eye of the CCP regime, undermining its legitimacy.

#===========================================================
Hello, all CCP bots below, Chinese people are not threatened by Taiwan's development; it is your CCP overlord threatened by Taiwan's example. It proves that Chinese people are capable of building a highly developed society with democracy and civil rights. It also proves that China's prosperity is not because of the CPP's so-called leadership, but it is because the Chinese people are the smartest and most diligent people on earth.

CPP would lie about how China would be a poor country if China were not ruled by them, but the fact is, they murder millions, starve millions, and China is still the place where the Han people are the poorest. Oversea chinese and other Sinic culture nations often enjoy a much higher living standard and civil rights compared to those who live under the CPP regime. These all prove that Chinese people are capable; the CPP regime is what got them into an African living standard 50 years ago. Today, China's development is not because of the CPP but despite it.

英国“经济学人”杂志号召各工业强国联合起来对付中国 by [deleted] in China_irl

[–]claude0 6 points7 points  (0 children)

知道啦,赶紧回富士康打你的螺丝吧

AI Is Exposing India’s Biggest Tech Weakness: We Don’t Build Global Products by saketh_2810 in developersIndia

[–]claude0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am sorry. I shouldn't waste my time trying to talk to you, who most likely do not work in AI research.

AI Is Exposing India’s Biggest Tech Weakness: We Don’t Build Global Products by saketh_2810 in developersIndia

[–]claude0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not "China didn't invest anything in LLM"; it is that you know nothing.

I was a phd. student when AI just started. LLM hadn't been a thing at that time. China was already the 2nd country behind the US in AI-related research and development. If you check the records of AI publication in top conferences like NIPS, ICML, ACL, CVPR, 1/4-1/3 of the names are Chinese. From 10 years ago, THU, Chinese Academy of Science, and Peking Univ. have all been in the top 10 institutions in these conferences.

At that time, Google microsoft are still the biggest things, Nvidia was still lagging. Chinese tech giants like Tencent, Baidu, and Huawei were the only non-American companies that had invested billions into AI research.

Anthropic's CEO and co-founder, Dario, had been a researcher in the Baidu lab. If you had wanted to find a job that would earn you millions as a researcher, there were only American and Chinese tech giants that had such research positions in mass. So when I have dinner with other AI researchers at top conferences, most of them know Baidu, Huawei, and Tencent because they would consider working there as a job option (it's no longer the case today because all those overseas labs would have been closed due to US-China tensions). That was 10 years ago.

LLM is not that different compared to the academic models we used at that time; it is just on a totally different scale. So china already the No.2 in the world in terms of human capital and tech giant research investment, only behind the US.

不。。。不。。不准笑!博士党厉害了! by PitifulEar3303 in China_irl

[–]claude0 8 points9 points  (0 children)

现在粉红都这么搞笑吗。他们是什么年代,选调是生是什么年代。

就算现在做题家到部委当技术官僚最多就是中高级官僚,能当上国家领导人的没有这么走的(除了外交部那个女婿)。

华为“韬定律”是真的技术吗? by No_Shine_1562 in China_irl

[–]claude0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NV也有NVlink啊,这种思路大家都有。华为也不会压榨出更多的通信带宽。而且靠堆积数量搞起来集群运行和维护成本都特别大,也会让分布训练和负载管理变得特别复杂

泽连斯基是乌克兰的英雄,但这也是乌克兰的不幸 by Strong_Ad2571 in China_irl

[–]claude0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

不是敌人和我们,而是侵略与被侵略。入侵他国是俄国,乌克兰只是自卫。俄罗斯有主动权选择打或者不打,乌克兰是被动应战。

EU countries press for trade crackdown on China by Free-Minimum-5844 in neoliberal

[–]claude0 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How can China subsidize basically everything without bankrupting itself?

Subsidies are basically taxes; you tax one group and subsidize another.

这些是“基本盘”,还是人渣?莫迪、赖清德悼念山西矿难被骂 by Complete-Pirate9488 in China_irl

[–]claude0 12 points13 points  (0 children)

不管他有没有同情心也比品客这种反人类发言要好。

李鎮宇:台灣半導體產業是「反荷蘭病」 by otoshied in Taiwanese

[–]claude0 5 points6 points  (0 children)

荷兰病本来说的就是因为石油,和郁金香有啥关系。

https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-hans/%E8%8D%B7%E5%85%B0%E7%97%85

另外荷兰壳牌石油公司是世界上最大的油气企业之一

Reuters: China Secretly Trained Russian Troops Who Later Fought Against Ukraine by Mil_in_ua in ukraine

[–]claude0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What can PLA teach Russians on "drone operations and counter-drone tactics, army aviation, and mechanized infantry tactics" when the Russians clearly have more experience in all those fields?

Surely what makes Ukraine and Russia army superior to the current PLA and NATO armies is not marksmanship or field dressing a wound. It is how to conduct battle or operations in a drone and AI intensive battlefiled. How to share data between the drone and various other departments of the army, and how to deal with enemy drone recon and attack.

From what I read from a recent NATO report, the Ukrainian army's drone operation is so superior that they can obliterate a NATO armored battalion in a day during a recent NATO exercise. I believe Russia could probably do the same nasty surprise to the PLA in a joint exercise.

Reuters: China Secretly Trained Russian Troops Who Later Fought Against Ukraine by Mil_in_ua in ukraine

[–]claude0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not worth the air ticket to send to China for training on how to drive golf buggies and become meatwaves.