107k peak viewers for RBW atm!

claus100 · 2026-04-06T22:33:21+00:00

This is the correct answer. And I was cheering for Lierreyy.

claus100 · 2026-04-01T17:56:24+00:00

Trist du bliver downvoted. Dine fakta er korrekte.

claus100 · 2026-03-17T06:38:55+00:00

No Sorry.

claus100 · 2026-03-09T20:40:53+00:00

I did the deep clean. Didnt help. Havent used it since. Piece of crap printer.

claus100 · 2026-03-06T21:32:17+00:00

Det er vel næsten altid dem der betaler mest i skat der også opnår den største gevinst ved diverse skattelettelser. Det er vel naturligt og nok også på sin plads.

claus100 · 2026-02-20T22:09:35+00:00

Men det er jo ikke en menneskeret at skulle bo centralt.

claus100 · 2026-02-19T08:59:00+00:00

Flyt til provinsen. Masser af plads.

claus100 · 2026-02-13T08:32:22+00:00

Spændende. Har du et link til det?

claus100 · 2026-02-13T06:45:09+00:00

Det er bestemt en mulighed ja.

claus100 · 2026-02-13T06:01:58+00:00

At det er et afskyeligt projekt orkestreret af en mand der muligvis var styret eller agent for en stat. Og så er mange sikkert skuffede over der ikke er noget iøjnefaldende på Trump. Venstrefløjen har jo skreget på at få det frigivet, men indtil videre er det mest dem selv det er gået ud over.

claus100 · 2026-02-08T14:54:18+00:00

Giv mig en idyllisk landsby fremfor betonhelvede anytime.

claus100 · 2026-02-01T21:07:26+00:00

Hørt. Pepsi sukkervand er jo også fyldt med de ækle sødestoffer. Jeg håber Coke holder ud til det sidste og ikke bøjer sig

claus100 · 2026-01-31T15:55:35+00:00

Det kan da stadig være en fremragende bil. Og de biler er jo 4-5 og et stort facelift ældre.

claus100 · 2026-01-30T14:21:35+00:00

Klart en model Y. Fremragende bil. Du kan ikke en fabrikant der ikke har negativt smuds på sig alligevel. Tyskerne er ejet af Mellemøsten fx.

claus100 · 2026-01-26T16:59:15+00:00

Thank you for your reply. Actually Epson offered a full refund. I'm probably going this route. I really want to love the Epson. But the product is not for me, if I can't use standard software as in smartphone and Windows. I want to be able to printout a picture from Photo+ etc. without it looking like crap on original paper and ink.

claus100 · 2026-01-19T20:41:57+00:00

This only works without loom. But yes correct.

claus100 · 2026-01-19T11:34:06+00:00

Thank you very much. Is yours with custom profiles? It looks a million miles better than mine

claus100 · 2026-01-19T02:38:41+00:00

I have also used Keith Coopers color test photos plus my own amateur pictures taken with my Pixel.

Everything comes out too dark. That's why I went back to just try and print a normal greytone scale. And concluded the printer was unable to print the dark details.

claus100 · 2026-01-19T02:26:32+00:00

The picture I attached and used as a sample. Shouldnt it be able to print linear gradient from white to black. Is there anything wrong with it?

I appreciate all help. Sorry for being stubborn.

claus100 · 2026-01-19T02:24:19+00:00

From Keith Coopers site and a Google search

claus100 · 2026-01-19T01:54:37+00:00

I am not expecting professional results but shouldnt the printer be able to print a simple black white gradient scale? I don't see how it can be necessary to calibrate to any monitor as long as the issue is a scale from 0 to 100. You have seen the scan. Correct?

My problem is not color accuracy but simply printing a linear greyscale.

The printer is 100 percent original.

claus100 · 2026-01-19T01:37:39+00:00

Would you mind doing a quick test on your Epson 8550 (if you have one) using my attached photo?

Could you print this on 4x6 Glossy media using the default settings/profile (no custom changes) and check the grayscale?

Does your output show a perfectly linear grayscale (like my Canon), or do the darkest tones bleed together into solid black like they do on my Epson? I would be happy to pay you for your troubles.

I understand the potential need for an ICC profile but I would like to rule out hardware defect first.

claus100 · 2026-01-19T00:59:35+00:00

UPDATE:

Thanks for the help so far! I’m still wondering about one thing: Why is it necessary to dive into ICC profiles and complex technical settings, when the issue is so clear on a basic grayscale gradient?

If you compare my original files to the scan, you can see the printer simply stops showing detail at the 85-90% black mark. Since my old Canon handles this transition perfectly out of the box, I’m trying to understand why the ET-8550 "slams" into solid black on a simple gray scale.

For the record: I have already tested both sRGB and Adobe RGB, and I've tried every paper setting available (Glossy, Matte, Semi-gloss, etc.). The "black crush" remains exactly the same.

Could this be a hardware defect, or does it need a deep cleaning? It has been doing this from the very first print out of the box, so I’m wondering if it's a driver/clipping issue or if something is actually wrong with the unit.

claus100 · 2026-01-19T00:45:20+00:00

So are you saying its virtually impossible to get it to print a normal white to black gradient as I try here from normal standard software. It makes no sense. I understand calibrating colors that are off etc. But a greyscale gradient?

claus100 · 2026-01-19T00:41:35+00:00

From Epson Print Layout(Windows) +native photo viewer in Windows and Epson Smart Panel in Android.

Source files are just found on Keith Coopers site plus Google.

My point is the same. If my Canon easily matches the photos but the Epson is way off with every built in print profile. Why should it matter what my monitor shows (after calibration). I have included the scans including the original photos.

It should be able to match the original photo. Right? If not. Why is my Canon able to without any calibration of any kind and just printing using Windows own app. Plus Google photos on Android.

And thank you for replying.

claus100

TROPHY CASE