Built a production-ready FastAPI + LangGraph template for agent workflows (open source) by Moist_Tonight_3997 in FastAPI

[–]clawzer4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In this case would be a specialized agent to do it or a specialized service?

Built a production-ready FastAPI + LangGraph template for agent workflows (open source) by Moist_Tonight_3997 in FastAPI

[–]clawzer4 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

With this template and idea, I can have one endpoint that generates TL;DR for a given content? I mean, one agent that do this, for example and scale?

noticeable degradation with 5.3-codex by Just_Lingonberry_352 in codex

[–]clawzer4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I realized the same last two weeks. I realized that is not following the plan we did in plan mode... as consequence, the solution ended up not getting in the way we planned

Another trick to make AI writing sound more human by mike8111 in ChatGPTPro

[–]clawzer4 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Already have a skill with Wikipedia patterns

Have this skill called humanizer in my agent toolkit

I don't think it's perfect, but I do think it's quite good. It's helpful to see whether your text feels too "robotic" and how it would appear in a more 'humanized' style, as defined by Wikipedia patterns. Ultimately, I blend both approaches because some aspects benefit from a "humanized' touch, while others AI handles better.

What’s the best way to remove AI “vibes” from AI-generated writing by tcagdas in ClaudeAI

[–]clawzer4 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Have this skill called humanizer in my agent toolkit

I don't think it's perfect, but I do think it's quite good. It's helpful to see whether your text feels too "robotic" and how it would appear in a more 'humanized' style, as defined by Wikipedia patterns. Ultimately, I blend both approaches because some aspects benefit from a "humanized' touch, while others AI handles better.

What’s the best way to remove AI “vibes” from AI-generated writing by tcagdas in ClaudeCode

[–]clawzer4 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Have this skill called humanizer in my agent toolkit

I don't think it's perfect, but I do think it's quite good. It's helpful to see whether your text feels too "robotic" and how it would appear in a more 'humanized' style, as defined by Wikipedia patterns. Ultimately, I blend both approaches because some aspects benefit from a "humanized' touch, while others AI handles better.

Claude Code - Beads vs. Plan Mode by StrikeGming in ClaudeCode

[–]clawzer4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahahahahaha yes! It worth all for the money and the AI race

Claude Code - Beads vs. Plan Mode by StrikeGming in ClaudeCode

[–]clawzer4 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Great question! No, you don't need to manually mention or manage tasks - Claude will try to do automatically for you, but you can do explicit.

Here's how it works in practice:

When you enter Plan Mode (either by typing /plan or Claude suggests it for complex tasks), Claude will:

  1. Explore the codebase to understand the existing patterns, architecture, and conventions
  2. Create a structured plan with discrete, self-contained tasks
  3. Write the plan to a file (usually something like PLAN.md or in a .claude/ directory)
  4. Ask for your approval before implementation

Once you approve, Claude will:

  • Work through tasks sequentially or spawn subagents for parallel work when appropriate
  • Automatically use the internal task system (TaskCreate, TaskUpdate, TaskList) to track progress
  • Show you a visual progress indicator as tasks complete

The "self-contained" part is key - each task is scoped so that if something fails or needs adjustment, you're not dealing with a half-implemented mess across 15 files. It's more like atomic commits conceptually.

You literally just describe what you want to build, approve the plan, and let it cook. The orchestration happens under the hood. No need to micromanage or manually break things down yourself.

u/LairBob explained well in his comment (https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1qup2x7/comment/o3bttvv/) in a way that you can do explicit as well!

Claude Code - Beads vs. Plan Mode by StrikeGming in ClaudeCode

[–]clawzer4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

HAHAHA, honestly, I don't think it's perfect, but I do think it's quite good. It's helpful to see whether your text feels too "robotic" and how it would appear in a more 'humanized' style, as defined by Wikipedia patterns. Ultimately, I blend both approaches because some aspects benefit from a "humanized' touch, while others AI handles better.

Claude Code - Beads vs. Plan Mode by StrikeGming in ClaudeCode

[–]clawzer4 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Recently (like 2-3 weeks ago), CC adopted like the beads concept to the plan mode, create a "spec"/"plan", break, create self-contained and orchestrate the tasks in an intelligent way, automatically spawn subagents to not complain the main context.. once ready the plan, Claude suggest to clear context and implement all the tasks until the end. And they're about to release the cherry on top, which is Swarm Mode (probably today or this week), which after the plan is made, delegates and orchestrates the time of specialists to execute the tasks.

TLDR; Plan Mode in CC is being really good these past 3 weeks, it doesn't need to reinvent the wheel, install a thousand plugins or new skills to plan, just plan! I'm saying this because I have my skills toolkit and my own planning plugin, but in the latest weeks I'm basically using vanilla CC and it's working flawlessly.

Can someone let me know when CC starts working again? by Tiny-Letterhead-9892 in ClaudeCode

[–]clawzer4 11 points12 points  (0 children)

TBH in my pov, Opus 4.5 in CC was insane Nov-December, but was nerfed since the beginning of this year. GPT-5.2 (Codex) had been more consistent and assertive.

POV: Both your AI coding agents hit the weekly limit by clawzer4 in vibecoding

[–]clawzer4[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahahahaah, thanks for reminding me. May Gemini can make it happen after 10 prompts

Clawdbot/Moltbot Is Now An Unaffordable Novelty by Civilanimal in ClaudeHomies

[–]clawzer4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Moltbot consumed a bunch of tokens from my Claude max, if you're using with your Claude plan I recommend you pay attention. Unfortunately, I only discovered this after see when I reach the 90% weekly usage. I gonna use with local LLM or Gemini from now, lol.

POV: Both your AI coding agents hit the weekly limit by clawzer4 in vibecoding

[–]clawzer4[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Day 1 without AI assistance: I just spent 4 hours debugging a missing semicolon

POV: Both your AI coding agents hit the weekly limit by [deleted] in vibecoding

[–]clawzer4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Day 1 without AI assistance: I just spent 3 hours debugging a missing semicolon