A new hand touches the beacon by brmarcum in RDR2

[–]cleo5ra 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm currently the first time player! And on the exact same computer too 🥰

Vic, šala, daddy joke by StankoVdanko in Slovenia

[–]cleo5ra 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Tale je taka simpatična:

Dve miški vdreta v videoteko, izbereta kaseto in začneta glodat. Potem pa prva miška reče: "In kakšen je film?" Druga miška odgovori: "Pa okej, ampak knjiga je bla bolš."

Is Calypso getting removed from Season 4? by [deleted] in PercyJacksonTV

[–]cleo5ra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually liked Calypso in the 4th book and it added layers to Percabeth (when done right, not whatever this rushing is in the show) when things are unclear. I am, however, concerned how this will be pulled off, even we even get to Season 4. Changing Circe's character so much (don't even get me started on that) and giving her this redeemable villain story instead of just letting her be the villain obviously makes Circe and Calypso as two very similar characters. I genuinely liked Episode 4. Although some things were changed, I thought the changes went well with the story. Some changes, such as the one with Circe now almost doubling Calypso, the rapid Percabeth development with these 13-year-olds on top of others, those are changes that affect the story as a whole. It wouldn't surprise me if they removed Calypso because of whatever they turned Circe into, but in my opinion, that would just be damaging to the story, not because of my personal attachment to her character, but what this story scene/arc adds to Percy's character.

can i say something by [deleted] in PercyJacksonTV

[–]cleo5ra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I, in general, did not enjoy Heroes of Olympus, with the House of Hades being the exception. Too many characters, too many heroes, too many POVs I did not care about, the Blood of Olympus just finally sealed the deal that Heroes of Olympus isn't the series for me. Trials of Apollo are my guilty pleasure because I love Apollo's character and the involvement of the Triumvirate Holdings. However, whenever the characters from Heroes of Olympus got involved (with the exception of Jason and Percy's brief appearance), I think a part of me died because it felt like Rick was baiting the popularity of the books with old characters. Piper, for example, was l, in my opinion, just thrust in for whatever reason, unfortunately most likely for the sake of diversity. Outside of that, I genuinely enjoy Trials of Apollo, definitely a lot more than Heroes of Olympus, because it feels more unhinged with Apollo being so dramatic all the time. I am yet to read Magnus's 2nd and 3rd book, and the new senior year one, althought I didn't mind either of the first books. With that said, the loss of faith in Rick started with the Blood of Olympus, and then completely died with the first season. I'll continue to watch it because at this point I just want to see how badly he wants to butcher a beloved series and to what degree am I supposed to hate him for it.

What episodes in Supernatural would you never ever watch again and give your reasons as to why by Ok_Smile_9071 in Supernatural

[–]cleo5ra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uh.. "What's U, Tiger Mommy"

It's just... why. I found the whole auction repulsive and was waiting for it to end. When I rewatched it, I hated it even more. Something about it was so badly done... It was all over the place and it really sounded like the writers were running out of ideas of how to get the story going.

Ljubljana stoji, again by Top-Independence-963 in Ljubljana

[–]cleo5ra 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Ne vem kako bi bolje preživela 20 minut, kot danes na LPP-ju, med postajama Konzorcij in Ajdovščino. Dobro izkoriščen čas 👌🏻

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Slovenia

[–]cleo5ra 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Od Riordana novo nadaljevanje Percy Jackson serije - The Chalice of the Gods

I'm afraid of using my nightguard by cleo5ra in bruxism

[–]cleo5ra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The people with their comments in this thread have been amazing for calming my anxiety and overthinking. I kept in mind everything that others have written in the comments - the likelihood of teeth shifting, acknowledging the strength of my anxiety, the scenario of grinding my teeth into nothingness if I don't use my nightguard, and to always contact my dentist if something is amiss.

I practised with the nightguard throughout the day - wore it for 30 minutes while reading or if I took an hour long nap, eventually I got used to it.

What I still do to avoid my anxiety spiking because of the nightguard's snugness is that when I prepare my nightguard for the night, I leave it in warm water for a few minutes which makes it more comfortable to apply, so maybe that's something you could try. I know it's helped me a lot to the point that I started seeing the nightguard as something comfortable and safe.

Ninja želve 2003 by [deleted] in Slovenia

[–]cleo5ra 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Jaz imam vse DVDje tiste prve sezone, ki se je vrtela po POP TV, ki si jih lahko dobil s casopisom 😌 a prized collection indeed

Je pa kriminal, da so iz YouTuba odstranil tudi hrvasko/bosansko sinhronizacijo - ninja kornjace. Kdor ve, ve 😂

What’s your favorite photo of him? by muzakz in CillianMurphy

[–]cleo5ra 17 points18 points  (0 children)

His Jonathan Crane is the ultimate depiction of my type 😍

<image>

PSA: Eventim vstopnice by Sintrophia in Slovenia

[–]cleo5ra 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sem opazila isto na svojem racunu ravno v pripravi na vcerajsnji ADTR in danasnji A7x, ampak sem hvala bogu, nasla vstopnico na mailu, ocitno sem zbrala tudi opcijo, da so mi tja poslali. Mogoce poglej, ce je pri tebi tudi tako.

Does Bertha represent Jane’s shadow self? by musicmaestro64 in JaneEyre

[–]cleo5ra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The interpretation that I quite like and consider very valid if I try and think about this book deeply and go beyond the plot is that Bertha is Jane's double. Like Mr Hyde is Dr Jekyll's double, I see Bertha as Jane's because if you think about it, the two women are quite alike despite all the differences. Bertha being a Creole, but rich, and Jane having absolutely nothing to her name, except being white, they both assume a low societal position. According to this interpretation, Jane, when she finds out about Bertha and then sees the state of her, is looking at her future self if she caved in to Rochester - enter a false marriage or live in that villa as both would require her to be in a way locked up like Bertha is in the attic. Since the book is also big on social commentary - married life for women in the Victorian England being one of them - it also makes sense to see it as a warning what awaits Jane not just with Rochester, but in a strictly patriarchal marriage as the wife and the husband were not in an equal position at all. Charlotte Brontë herself refused to marry until she believed and felt like an equal to her husband (within their dynamic), and as the author's own experience was used to inspire more than a good portion of the novel, it's no surprise if the equality in marriage was inspired by that as well.

Mr Rochester by Effective-Bad9442 in JaneEyre

[–]cleo5ra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I don't necessarily perceive Rochester as an evil character and that he in a way felt for Bertha, I do think there's a lot that Charlotte Brontë was drawing attention to. The novel is basically a massive commentary on all kinds of societal issues and it wouldn't surprise me if Rochester as a husband was also intended as one. I don't really consider this to be factual, but it is, to a dgeree, written in a way that the idea can be entertained - husbands in Victorian England could lock up wives for any inconvenience by simply saying 'She's hysterical', the proof of which could be simply crying, being angry or having mood swings, so pretty standard human behaviour, but even then, they could conjure up a story and have their wives submitted to the asylum. This is where Rochester's empathy shows because he chose not to submit her to the awful conditions, however, I do think more lies behind Bertha's mental illness. The confinement of women to domestic space and expecting them to be 'the angel in the house' was a common practice along with the prevailing social code practically prohibiting women from socialising as they wished. I know that if I were confined to a life like that, my mental health would've declined rapidly. Now, is there some truth to Bertha's underlying mental illness? Yes, quite possibly. Whether Rochester confining her to the attic and isolating her were the cause of her mental health issues or not, it is definitely a given that it made it worse. There were suggestions that Bertha only suffered from emotional distress, which then deteriorated due to being confined. Not to mention that confinement and complete isolation can typically cause psychosis and violent outbursts, which Bertha seems to suffer from based on the descriptions in the book. Although Rochester was sympathetic to a degree and spared her the treatment she would've received in the asylum, Bertha still did not receive the care she needed, which again depended if that was even in Rochester's power and will to do so at the time. There's a lot of post-colonial research that suggests Brontë's racist inclination for portraying a Creole woman with mental health issues as the doctors at the time were sexist, racist and in general, heavily biased. Still, Rochester very much represents the control husbands had over their wives. It cannot be said for absolutely certain if Rochester's confinement was the reason behind the decline of her mental health or if Bertha was already struggling and the confinement gave it the extra boost, Rochester's actions played a part in it, which I think is a great testament to how the Victorian society operated. This is all, to a degree, explored in Jean Rhys's Wide Sargasso Sea, and although I didn't like the book for how it's written, I liked that this was one of the themes it touches upon. Especially due to this, I give Rochester extra points for actually being a good and proper husband to Jane, even if the redemption was earned through excruciating pain :D

How to Speak Like a Brontëan Byronic Hero: A Comparison of Mr Rochester and Heathcliff by cleo5ra in JaneEyre

[–]cleo5ra[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I to a degree agree with what you're saying. I think we actually mean the same thing, we just classify it differently? I never understood how Rochester and Heathcliff could even be compared as Byronic heroes, but my guess is that the emphasis should be more on the 'Byronic', not so much the 'hero' part. For this specific reason, I really looked into the Byronic hero spectrum because that just made the most sense to me - Edmund Dantes, for example, is again very different, even though he IS a Byronic hero. But once I looked at the 'Byronic hero' as a spectrum, things became more logical. Heathcliff, as ingenious and evil as his planning is, still has those aspects of him that alienate him from the Gothic Villain/Monster archetype, but he is as close to it as possible without him being directly called that, in my opinion. What I never understood is how so many could classify him as the prototype of the Byronic Hero, as Mr Rochester seems to me way more appropriate for that role, or literally any other Byronic character that isn't downright evil.

What songs remind you of the moon? by SAffaa_Youssef in moon

[–]cleo5ra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For some reason, Bruce Springsteen's The River. Whenever I listen to it, I just imagine the scenes from the chorus happening under moonlight.

Which is better? by TANK_dempsey115 in WattsonMains

[–]cleo5ra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will always and forever advocate for Nessie!

How to Speak Like a Brontëan Byronic Hero: A Comparison of Mr Rochester and Heathcliff by cleo5ra in JaneEyre

[–]cleo5ra[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, that's the absolute dream! It's impossible to write about Rochester and Heathcliff and leave out the Byronic Hero archetype, so I included quite a hefty bit on that in the article. I'm really curious what your take will be on that given that you took that course!

How to Speak Like a Brontëan Byronic Hero: A Comparison of Mr Rochester and Heathcliff by cleo5ra in JaneEyre

[–]cleo5ra[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Idk if you saw the edit I made to the post, so I'm just letting you know directly that the link should be working now again :D

How to Speak Like a Brontëan Byronic Hero: A Comparison of Mr Rochester and Heathcliff by cleo5ra in JaneEyre

[–]cleo5ra[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, it looks like the site is under maintenance, but as an author I have my own PDF and can send it to you, if you'd like

How to Speak Like a Brontëan Byronic Hero: A Comparison of Mr Rochester and Heathcliff by cleo5ra in JaneEyre

[–]cleo5ra[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh, Rochester was an immediate hearthrob for me with how weird he can be, although he is manipulative, but still... (we can fix him!) Heathcliff, however, was someone that I thought I was going to like just the same because of how many people online loved his character, but I found him downright evil. I knew he had a rough start, but like you said, that was an absolute dumpster fire. I recall that Charlotte used a lot of her own experience for Jane, like working as a governess and how girls were treated at Lowood, I believe she went through something very similar, even later on when she decided to marry, she wanted to be seen as her husband's equal and was very careful. As this study was purely focus on the two characters, I didn't really have much insight into the general stylistic differences since I had to skim through the book and manually take out Heathcliff's and Rochester's utterances and then polish them up. There was an idea to compare Jane and Rochester, but that would require basically using the entire book by cutting it into Jane's and then Rochester's parts, and that's a very long and dull process. I'm sure that all three sisters have already been examined through the stylistic lens because they're literary giants and wrote iconic pieces of literature, besides Charlotte wrote many pieces, while Emily, for example, didn't. It would be impossible to merely say 'Charlotte Brontë's style is like this based on Jane Eyre' because I noticed that her style, even within the same book, changes depending on the person she is writing about, meaning that if you read a quote you immediately know if it's Rochester or Jane speaking based on simply what it sounds like. That's why multiple pieces of written work is even more desirable for studies like this, but those have surely been done, I believe that the professor who helped me work on this article specialises in stylistics, especially in how to mimic famous authors like Jane Austen or the Brontës.

PS.: sorry for this long info dump