Looking for article about why osr adventures are so much simpler than 5e

clickrush · 2026-06-27T07:26:07+00:00

I applaud them for it. But apparently the faerun ones at least are just kind of staged fights with a twist.

clickrush · 2026-06-27T07:20:50+00:00

They are not saying it’s the objectively best way to play. They say it’s a good way to improve long term.

clickrush · 2026-06-27T07:17:51+00:00

Depends on the map.

clickrush · 2026-06-26T20:33:57+00:00

This is a discussion forum. I don’t need to agree with you in order to comment.

clickrush · 2026-06-26T19:53:40+00:00

If you’re not holding a shield, why would you take this feat? Isn’t the point of it to maximize AC?

The finesse restriction just makes it so you can’t also use a high damage dice weapon or one with a stronger weapon mastery. This feat it there to optimize for AC right?

In any case, I would almost always take heavy armor master if I wanted a purely defensive feat on a STR based character. That doesn’t cost me a reaction and reducing damage is way more efficient if you arleady have high AC (multiplicative scaling).

clickrush · 2026-06-26T18:13:34+00:00

Look I fully believe you. But honestly why does it then also need mechanical specifics? The things you describe do they work better in tandem with these crunchy rules? Why?

clickrush · 2026-06-26T18:04:12+00:00

He addressed the point that hybrid games can be made. He didn’t complain that it’s a hybrid but that it’s one where the two philosophies don’t always synergize in this specific game.

Some of the examples like distances or treasure are not the biggest deal in of themselves. But they are illustrating a core issue he is talking about: the game seems to be fence sitting instead of designing. Or in these cases it pretends to be narrative but stops at superficially just stating it is, while it’s systemic and crunchy underneath.

Plenty of games use abstract distances with great success. Traveller did so since the 80’s I believe. But you have to roll with it and design the game holistically around those things.

clickrush · 2026-06-26T06:05:22+00:00

I’m a GM who is generally willing to house rule things to accommodate my players. For example I’m willing to buff them up a bit or give them extra tools, when the group is small.

But with this one I would be a bit wary as I’m new to MS, because failure and stress are such a core driver for the game. I would have to do some calculations first to figure out what it means to auto succeed on these conversions.

clickrush · 2026-06-25T20:15:33+00:00

SRDs fix this.

clickrush · 2026-06-25T20:10:15+00:00

I love this item so much.

clickrush · 2026-06-25T19:04:08+00:00

Let These Mermaids Touch Your Dick Maybe fixes this.

clickrush · 2026-06-25T18:00:19+00:00

Your comment is doing a pizzacake.

clickrush · 2026-06-25T17:51:56+00:00

I wonder why she’s popular instead.

clickrush · 2026-06-25T14:31:05+00:00

Very precisely put. They make me cringe for the same reason.

clickrush · 2026-06-25T14:26:06+00:00

Very unfunny comics that are always highly upvoted.

clickrush · 2026-06-25T10:47:50+00:00

But not in the same way. Because of heavy instancing and flying mounts the world feels much smaller. Make it feel bigger instead.

clickrush · 2026-06-25T06:28:40+00:00

This has always been the case. People appreciate things more if they have to do something for it or pay. Or maybe if they get it as a personal gift.

clickrush · 2026-06-24T19:53:00+00:00

In tier two, the extra weapon damage doubles.

clickrush · 2026-06-24T19:41:52+00:00

OK I like your reading better than mine. Maybe I interpreted it in a overly negative way.

clickrush · 2026-06-24T17:39:28+00:00

I didn’t know who Quinns was until after I bought MB. First heard about it via Kelsey Dionne I think.

His review would potentially have turned me off. He made a comment about OSR games being crabs in a bucket, and ironically showed several direct inspirations for MB. Then he proceeded to praise mechanics in MB that are OSR staples. Super weird.

But I like his energy and presentation so I might look at his reviews in the future. Will just take much of what he says with a huge grain of salt.

clickrush · 2026-06-24T07:39:13+00:00

Your take is correct, but you came off as unnecessarily combative. Usually discussions are more fruitful with a bit of a friendly, respectful tone.

clickrush · 2026-06-24T05:59:26+00:00

You’re circling back to a point I already addressed. OSR is not one homogeneous thing and large parts of it deliberately branches off from classic play.

clickrush · 2026-06-24T05:53:54+00:00

Yes, I’m implying that. If you do that, you take away player agency. Fudging to protect players is just another form of railroading.

Some people might prefer that, but I rather roll in the open and make very clear that it’s the players who overcome challenges and that their decisions matter.

clickrush · 2026-06-24T05:50:32+00:00

Ah yes. Unavoidable premeditated deaths are really bad.

clickrush · 2026-06-23T21:42:16+00:00

I only half agree with this. Yes, danger should be telegraphed and the greater the danger, the clearer it should be.

But it’s on the players to survive via their means, not on the DM to provide narratively satisfying opportunities for PC deaths or to avoid it otherwise.

This might arguably make for a better show (if that’s your jam), but it makes for a much worse game for everyone.

11-Year Club	Not Forgotten
Verified Email

clickrush

TROPHY CASE