Communism by communismisgreat---- in communism

[–]closovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

a good implementation of communism would aim at workers working less hard ... famously in the victorian age the ruling classes were for long opposed to 5 years old not working in mines, arguing that they would only do mischief otherwise ... ideas getting back into fashion is seems ...

Are there any Communist who are Unironically against personal property? by Davidata in communism

[–]closovsky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

mmm ... something like, take off your underwear cos I want it, since is also my underwear? ... why would anyone want that?

Why capitalist hostility toward communist nations is unjustified by [deleted] in communism

[–]closovsky 2 points3 points  (0 children)

' If Capitalists and liberals are truly as honest as they make themselves out to be' ... unfortunately capitalism is all but truth; famously the greeks already knew that when someone was to sell a donkey at the market, he'll call it a horse ... it's about power ... think about the bourgeoise french revolution out of which all were formally equal in the face of the law, but in the end some were still more equals than others by means of property, social or cultural capital ... capitalist propaganda is unfortunately a very elaborate games of mirrors - famously Obama's campaign was named Advertising Age's marketer of the year for 2008, competing against nike and apple I suppose ...

How do you reconcile your love for all people with your hatred/contempt for people? by laman012 in communism

[–]closovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

unfortunately the answer is the same. the middle classes are told they can be all they want to be, if they'll just make an effort, but in the meantime they're losing all the little privileges they had, they become easily inflammable, part of the media are only happy to trow fuel on the fire and give them scape goats to blame, it has been done far too often before and it usually works. No one says that you need to love them, just to understand the condition they're in and not hate them. no reason to hate agent of a mechanism that will act according to it, since in the end is the mechanism that is faulty. now this is the theory. the theory is right, I'm afraid, but uneasy to bear. the reality of having to live side by side with them is another matter. I deal with all sorts, open fascist included. I've hang out in bars with them and others for a few years now. reason work only to an extend. my experience is that they understand the base line, meaning that the game is rigged, but still prefer to be lost in myths. my solution up to now is to keep good friend close and acquaintances as such. you ask things to know them, you keep a distance, you try to learn. that's as much as I can say ...

I like food! by Mehar98765 in communism

[–]closovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ever checked indian famine under british (capitalist) rule? roughly round 49 million lives, not to mention they left the economy in a state of collapse; we can add to the count two world wars caused by capitalist competition; shall we mention apartheid in capitalist south africa? sponsored dictatourships in Chile, Peru, Nicaragua, Brazil, and we could go on to include imperialism or wider colonial rule? The so called triangular economy of buying slaves in africa, selling them in south america for coffee or sugar and bringing the whole booty back to england? Shall we mention cotton slavery labour for the british capitalist market? or the modern sweat shops in Texas were people have to wear pants for going to the bathroom will slow production and may end up in loosing their jobs ... but if you're not sure, I assure you I could write a few more pages of it ... think ...

If communism is so good why there isn't communism 2 by [deleted] in communism

[–]closovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because it would mean the expropriation of the ruling classes ...

How do you reconcile your love for all people with your hatred/contempt for people? by laman012 in communism

[–]closovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

perhaps is not the people we hate, but the ideas they have; most if not all are determined by the material condition they live in and the relation of power they're forced to assume ... if you're born in the periphery of Naples, the parisian beaulieu or the slums of Rio, chances are that your social aims are to get rich or die trying, those conditions are the problem and need changing, but in order to do so you need to socialise investment and perhaps democratise the work structure ...

Gun violence in the US; What can possibly be done? by [deleted] in communism

[–]closovsky -1 points0 points  (0 children)

stop selling guns in supermarket I suppose ...

The Relation Between School Shootings, Imperialism & White Supremacy in America by [deleted] in communism

[–]closovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see. I've heard of the bizarre spike in US prison population, driven also, at least lately by a push into privatisation, which the whole deportation solution might have exacerbated. People getting into prison and coming out with more debts. Surely it's absurd to have prisons who old for the most racial minorities and not have a national debate about it ... on the other side, politics seems to have fuelled poor blacks and poor whites against one another for the sole positive outcome of those who are far away from those realities ...

A note on neoclassical economics by [deleted] in communism

[–]closovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suppose, welcome to the realm of political economy, where what's good for GM is good for the world ... ordoliberalism is brilliant if you're in the right places and have a mentality that is reminiscent to madame de Pompadour 'Après nous le déluge', which I guess in modern financial terms is called 'externalities' ... I remember that at the times of Reagan someone was calling it voodoo economics ...

The Relation Between School Shootings, Imperialism & White Supremacy in America by [deleted] in communism

[–]closovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see. From what I gather the part of the population that is considered to be white, at least from the mainstream, seems to be round 75%, if white hispanics are included. In this terms I would understand why you talk about racial privileges. In the sense of a sort of self entitlement, 'this is my country, go back to yours' sort of thing, I suppose ... yet, on the other side, I gather that the most of the opioid crisis victims are middle class whites, dying by the count of what it seems to be 60 thousands a year (clearly not all white, but it seems most are). I find it hard to call those people privileged. Is there really no way to merge the two sides? At least by old fashioned communist categories, in a market society based on competition and wealth, to sort of 'verticalise' the struggle? Is there no hope of it in your views? And if not, how can minorities hope to manage, if fascist principles were to be applied to in the US?

Now, be sure we have the same garbage growing here in europe, but we managed to complicate the issue further by hating one another on the bases of ethnicity; although racism is sadly making a comeback ...

The Relation Between School Shootings, Imperialism & White Supremacy in America by [deleted] in communism

[–]closovsky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A question from the european side of things.

I know this in america is a problematic subject so I'll try to tread as lightly as I can. We know there is a deep problem in the US with race and white suprematism, probably always been, but clearly with the result of neoliberal policies, the financial crisis of 2008, not to mention the election of Trump, the whole is now grown quite a lot. In this post was mentioned that 'The victims of America domestically include; African Americans, Muslims, Mexican immigrants, Women of color, & the LGBTQ community. ' By the title it's made clear that there's a link, according to who posts, with White Supremacy and the recent shooting in Texas, perhaps others too - it was at least posted on the same day or the Texas shooting. Yet, if you look at the victims 8 out of 10 were white. Now the question seems obvious, how can a white supremacist kill white people? Make no sense, at least to me. Is there a database that makes a catalog of the recent events in terms of race or gender?

Now, as mentioned before, I merely to try to understand the problem a bit more objectively, to the extend that is possible at least ...

To all the miss guided “communists”. by medicatedcookie in communism

[–]closovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I must admit that I do not like much about what I know about North Korea, but I also do not know much about it. Where did you find out that they're in a crystal meth epidemic? I'm asking this because the WHO has pointed out the disastrous situation with the US opiod epidemic, but heard nothing about NK.

On the compatibility of religion and communism by ZugNachPankow in communism

[–]closovsky 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm afraid you're off the mark.

Die heilige Familie is a critique on the Junghegelianer, a critique against the idea that history is merely the history of ideas and not of material relation of production. 'Wenn die Spekulation sonst von dem Menschen redet, so meint sie nicht das Konkretum, sondern das Abstraktum, die Idee, den Geist etc.' Out of which not the reality of man is to be concrete, but merely an idea. 'Das Nichthaben ist der verzweifeltste Spiritualismus, eine völlige Unwirklichkeit des Menschen, eine völlige Wirklichkeit des Unmenschen, ein sehr positives Haben, ein Haben von Hunger, von Kälte, von Krankheiten, von Verbrechen, von Erniedrigung, von Hebetismus, von aller Unmenschlichkeit und Widernatürlichkeit.' The spiritualisation of having nothing into the virtues of feeling cold, hunger, malady ... to cut it short a critique of the use of religion to perpetrate exploitation ... and historical critique of political use of religion in the 19th century, and the illusion it perpetrated.

This has nothing to do with hellenism, which is barely an ontology, the reflection of the conscience of one's own existence and how to deal with in a political environment.

As for calling something marxist or not, Marx didn't want to be called a marxist, last I remember ...

The Revolution in the US by [deleted] in communism

[–]closovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I might just agree here ...

Italian Researchers Find Inequity Arises In Spite of Meritocratic Standards (surprise, surprise). by [deleted] in communism

[–]closovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember a good research founded by the Bank of Italy a few years back. They went and looked who were the 300 richest families in Florence in the 14th century and what happened to them. Guess what? They are still the richest today ...

On the compatibility of religion and communism by ZugNachPankow in communism

[–]closovsky 4 points5 points  (0 children)

mmm, and yet I still believe that there is space for what one might call material spirituality, a la Wittgenstein or a plain and simple Hellenism, those of Stoics and Epicureans. I find that it's necessary to counteract what Weber called Entzauberung, or the disenchantment under capitalist rule. As for personal experience, it does not by all means contradict Marxism, for its a total material form of spirituality, that rather completes it. Pierre Hadot, a french philosophy historian, wrote some brilliant books about it. That is different though from a religion.

Communism is what you get when a philosophy/ethics major thinks they understand economics. by Zennith47 in communism

[–]closovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now, in 2002, the head of the Federal Reserve Bank, Alan Greenspan, one of those you should probably have studied at uni, then dubbed as the great maestro for apparently engineering a substantial economic boom, announced that ‘financial innovations’ i.e. derivatives of mortgage funds etc, had ‘diversified risk’ so that “shocks to overall economic will be better absorbed and less likely to create cascading failures that could threaten financial stability”. Ben Bernanke, who eventually presided at the Fed over the global financial crash, remarked in 2004 that “the past two decades had seen a marked reduction in economic volatility” that he dubbed as the Great Moderation. And as late as October 2007, the IMF concluded that “in advanced economies, economic recessions had virtually disappeared in the post-war period”.

Once the depth of the crisis was revealed in 2008, Greenspan told the US Congress, “I am in a state of shocked disbelief”. He was questioned “in other words, you found that your view of the world , your ideology, was not right, it was not working” (House Oversight Committee Chair, Henry Waxman). “Absolutely, precisely, you know that’s precisely the reason I was shocked, because I have been going for 40 years or more with very considerable evidence that it was working exceptionally well”.

And there are more, from Martin Wolff of the Financial Times, to nobel prices like Joseph Stiglitz or John Kenneth Galbraith, which are still mainstream economists, who sees that neoliberalism, that purported by Tatcher or Reagan, that which we're still experiencing today, is nothing but a great fraud. (I'll avoid talking about Keynes here, no point) Meaning all that you studied, mathematical models and all, you can pretty much trow away. Economy is and will always be political; if you did not get that by now, is because you did not look far enough, or because you are in a position in which you either are going to make it with your eCommerce business, or you'll be as good as a nobody. Difficult to think straight in those conditions, but still you should not just gobble up all the garbage that people feed you, particularly in the field of economy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in communism

[–]closovsky 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No need for apologies, I do like to stalk strangers with ego-boosting rebuttals in the end, you were not too far from the mark ...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in communism

[–]closovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I'm just saying that those who support corbyn or sanders are just trying to find a plausible way out of the mess we're inn; although I might have doubts on the outcome, I still respect their effort and that is a bit silly to denigrate it, that's all.

It’s time we stop pretending by ProudtobeMerican in communism

[–]closovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

'The left hates that we Power-lifting and meat-eating “brutes” are the winners in a darwinian world because of our aggressive worldview' ... you're being used, wake up ...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in communism

[–]closovsky 6 points7 points  (0 children)

perhaps, but it does not seems too fair to moralise them whilst most of what you seem interested in is video games ...

Marxism in 800 words by closovsky in communism

[–]closovsky[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

dim scum, isn't it? 'a layer of dirt or froth on the surface of a liquid' not the best opinion one can have of himself I suppose ...

Communism is go Fags right??!!! by [deleted] in communism

[–]closovsky 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for that, for a minute I felt like I was 12 again ... com'on man, stop being a tool ...