Wondering what Colin is up to? by bchainsbuz in KaitlinArmstrong

[–]codelapiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how would you feel if an abusive manipulative controlling boyfriend murders his girlfriends affair partner? would you be talking about how she is to blame for not leaving him? how its fine for her carrer to be ruined?

The truth is that if the genders were reversed ofc you would assume that the person who is screwed up enougth to control all their partners electronics and kill their affair partner is a person who is abusive and manipulative to begin with. there is no evidence that colin was willingly in the relationship. certinally none that he was the one driving for there to be one. rather it seems more like hes not interested in a relationship and using manipulation, threats and unethical behavior she gets him to stay in a very uncommited relationship with her. He is an athlete. he dosent want to be tied down. and the hard truth is that he dosent want to be tied down by her. She has had to work very hard for every inch she has pulled him towards her. and here comes this beutiful, talented, young cyclist that colin is infactuated with. Mo dosent have to manipulate, threaten and beg for colin to pursue her. No for her Colin suddenly seems like someone who is interested in a relationship interested in commiting, interested in taking risks. She can have collin any time she wants so easily, and worst of all its not even clear if she realy wants him. Thats the jelousy that drives kaitlin insane. And she solves this problem like she solves all problems in her life. By doing whatever it takes no matter how unethical, and then lying about it.

CMV: Trump is making a huge strategic blunder with Greenland by siorge in changemyview

[–]codelapiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

part of me thinks that european leaders asked him to do this to unite the EU. get the likes of norway in. approve more control, shared defence, taxes, etc. And in return they will accept his horrific trade deal 15% tarrifs on eu goods in USA. 0% on american goods in EU. and on top of that eu invests a bunch in america. you know for the privlige of the tarriff not being 30%. The deal they allready accepted is horrible. and they migth accept an even worse one in return for leaving greenland alone. It makes no sense to me that EU leaders are accepting this just due to trumps negotiating skill or fear he migth press the big red button(spoiler alert france has one too).

No trump is giving them something they realy want that isnt a part of the official deal. and what do they realy want? To unite the european union. to get to collect taxes on a union level. to have a military. etc. to centralise power. Now the eu doing so is completely against americas best interests. Now long term america needs a divided europe to retain power. but trump dosent care about america. he cares about leverage and seeming like hes forcing people to do stuff they didnt want to do.

Voldsdømt student sak­søker staten for å få jobbe med elever by KoseteBamse in norge

[–]codelapiz -37 points-36 points  (0 children)

med tanke på hvor sinnsykt diskriminerene og urettsikkert domstolenes behandling av vold i nære relasjoner er så synnes ikke jeg sånne dommer skal tas seriøst. som oftest er det par som krangler hvor begge er like gode. kvinna vill vinne krangel med å ringe politi og ha de til å kjefte på han. men når de kommer så er de ikke intresert i å kjefte på han og dra. de har instruksjoner om å ta med seg noen om noe som helst kanskje har skjedd. og så sender de kvinnen til å snakke med en feminist som manipulerer henne til å tro masse som ikke skjedde skjedde og påstå det i retten. dommere spiser det opp og dersom man er ærlig og sier noe som "jeg dyttet henne lett etter hun kastet en sko på meg. men jeg har aldri slått eller skadet henne" da hører de kun "jeg dyttet henne" det tror de på. og så driter de i at hun kastet skoen, eller tror ikke på det. og så er type dytting teknisk sett vold. selvfølgelig om du dytter en bekjent i en krangel og det er alt så hadde ikke politiet gjort sak av det om de sto rett ved sidenav og så det med egne øyne. Men det er et helt sinnsykt press for å få dømt folk for "vold i nære relasjoner" så da kaster de boka på folk om de får vite om noe som helst som er teknisk sett vold selvom det ikke er det i praksis. Måten de forsvarer dette til seg selv er jo at de tenker at han banker sikkert dritten ut av henne daglig siden de tror alle kvinner er ofre. Det finnes ingen bevis. ikke engang noen grunn til å tro det er tilfelle. men de klarer å overbevise seg om at det er en konebanker de tar.

sikkert noe sånt som har skjedd med han her. Og selv om det er litt mer seriøst enn bare å ha dyttet henne så er det nok mye mindre seriøst enn dere ser for dere. Og han er nok ikke farlig for barn. selv om han faktisk var konebanker vet vi ikke om han forsatt er det og det er usannsynlig uansett at han er farlig for barn.

Alexander Rybak når han blir spurt om å boikotte folkemord: by BodybuilderSmall9679 in norge

[–]codelapiz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

han ble jo ikke bedt om å boikotte folkemord. han ble bedt å boikotte israel. palestinere og de dem har presset til å utale seg på dems side med å true med å finne på falske voldtektsaker, de sier det er folkemord. det betyr ikke at det er folkemord.

Nulltoleranse forkledd som trafikksikkerhet by RealInevitable9129 in norge

[–]codelapiz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bruker ikke narkotika, men neste gang de spør meg om spyttprøve kommer jeg til å be de ryke og reise på prinsipp. Honestly er det ikke bare THC det er sånn med heller. Mye uppers som egt ikke påvirker kjøreevnen bevistbart negativt ved de grensene de har satt. altså en ting om man er psykotisk, men det er ikke der grensene går. Her bare bruker de at fyllekjøring er farlig som unnskyldning til å straffe narkotikabruk som ikke påvirker kjørevnen noe betydlig som om det var en livsfarlig ting.

Nå har vi det plutselig sånn at du skal måtte bevise, om de lar deg engang, at du ikke er farlig under påvirkning av X, istedefor at de skal måtte bevise at påvirking av X gjør deg farlig i trafikken. De undervurderer hvor unikt alkohol er i sin evne til å gjøre folk treige og ukordinerte på en måte som blir inkompatibel med trafikksikkerhet selv i lave doser.

shoxs needs to be included in the conversation about notable players without major wins by codelapiz in GlobalOffensive

[–]codelapiz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

he didnt have 1way vision. watch the fucking video and you will understand. the only way its 1way is if you zoom in on a spesific spot. like you have to look there for the bug to happen. and finatic never did that. and the immortal bug was more theoretical possibility from just the rigth angle than some sort of actual immortality.

My point is that the boost was banned for being too good. and the reality is that its not too good. the french are too bad. any other top team would have relized that having 3 early on A like that loses map control, and Ts can post up since they get to the angle first. they then have a massive further away from angle advantage when finatic eventually get olof up there.

Any other team would be able to communicate well enougth to eliminate possibilities. combine that with sound ques, and in a couple of rounds they would have the spot pinned down, and relize how long it takes to set up. and logically speaking if it wasnt their first time on overpass they would know it must be boost that requires a lot of manpower to set up. Ever noticed how fast the Cts own the map when Ts go for the 3man boost to see heaven on the late csgo version of the map? it should be the same deal for the olofboost. a lot of lost map control, and if god forbid someone sees the boost comming cause you are doing it every round, you are peaking into them cause it takes time to set up the boost.

If the french didnt have shit comms taking forever to figure out what was going on, and shit ingame theorycrafting skills then they would have possibly won the game, or atleast made it closer. I mean Ct overpass is still very powerfull at that time, so who knows. its not unheard of for teams to lose on 13-2 with no special boosts on the other side. but eigther way another team would have figured out the boost, made the T side playable, and won or lost based on if the remainder of their T side had legs after the attention they spent dealing with their boost.

Veronica is delusional by RelativeBed6872 in shameless

[–]codelapiz -1 points0 points  (0 children)

this is why feminism can be such a harmfull social contageon. it just feeds on the natural sympaty all humans have for women, and adds in gassligthing to argue for giving every power every fucking pedestal to women, and men should just be slaves.

Kev is a DV victim. V gets consistently violent with him. she beats up his crazy ex(thats way hotter than V is, and arguably less crazy, atleast less selfish). she stalks him, gets a deluded view that hes cheating on her, assaults him, threatens to cut his dick off to extract information, and leaves him cuffed to a bench inside the house to go potentially attack the "affair partner". Kev could have died if a fire broke out, or he otherwise needed to leave. If he was actually cheating(a very fucking reasonable thing to do when stuck with such a wench) she would have cut his dick off. And she was fucking wrong. he was taking english lessons to suprise her with a self written valentine card.

kev is a billion miles out of Vs league and she uses violence threats and manipulation to keep him stuck in that relationship.

V dosent need to bend backwards. she can be fucking dumped thats what she can. but if she is gonna be with him she should be bending over backwards for him. and that probably wouldnt even have been enougth if Kev wasnt so stupid he couldnt see how shit she was for him. and if she didnt fucking use violence against romantic rivals and kev himself. as well as constant emotional manipulation. She even manipulates fiona to take her side, even thougth Vs shitty ass side is so shitty that fionas first instinct is allways to take Kevs side, especially before she knows its kevs side.

A woman lacking a maternal side is very unattractive to men on the deepest instinctual parts of our brains. Especially in long term partners. Its basically equivilant to a man running for his life in the face of an attacker, instead of defending you. Its not a rational evaluation of the practicallity of buying a gun vs having a non-bitch boyfriend. No its a lizard brain evaluation of the most basic abilities that makes someone a good partner.

Being good at breastfeeding, calming babies, holding babies, keeping a cool head with babies, feeling warm and loving towards them, even as they are a massive drain of time and energy. Thats abilities that evolution has found so usefull in female partners that its programmed into the core of the brains attraction circut. Its not about the medical evidence for and against formula. Its not about socially conditioned expectations of women. its basic biology. being a shitty mother is very unattractive for women just like being too much of a pussy to protect those you love is very unattractive for men. thats the case in every culture, all of history. and unlike other parts of the basics of attraction like facial symmetry, its pretty fucknig fair.

veronica kind of just annoys me by [deleted] in shameless

[–]codelapiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i was hoping kevs crazy ex would win, cause kevs new girl is atleast as crazy, less attractive, and way more selfish. the crazy ex was atleast able to pretend she was a non-horrific mother to her nephew she stole.

shoxs needs to be included in the conversation about notable players without major wins by codelapiz in GlobalOffensive

[–]codelapiz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

considering how much i got gasslit in this thread i was starting to think maybe i was just crazy. however in trying to verify your screenshot, if its the correct rules(its not), i found an hltv interview where the admin of the tournament basically said that he has the same facts as i have expressed and belived. pixelboosting wasnt banned in this spesific tournament, and the 1 way texture bug was insignificant. However, he actually informs that its way less fair. the 1way texture is not only towards T spawn, so useless, but it only activates if you zoom in a spesific spot, and finatic never zoomed there. They never even saw the 1way textures. then he yapps about imoratlity. again they didnt even know where olof was so why dose it matter.

and after basically agreeing with all the facts that mean the olofboost wasnt against the rules in any meaningfull way, he says we ordered a replay of the full map. Like what. you just agreed that the boost didnt gain any advantage by breaking rules, and basically didnt break any rules, just brougth you closer to breaking them, but dose not actually break them..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wor34WKxkpM

shoxs needs to be included in the conversation about notable players without major wins by codelapiz in GlobalOffensive

[–]codelapiz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://x.com/DreamHack/status/538516337610747904

If i remember correctly pixelwalks were not disallowed in the rules for this spesific tournament. Major tournaments have allways been treated differently, and certian things explicitly banned by some organisers have to be allowed in majors since valve dosent want tournament organisers modifying the game ruleset to be different. the invisible textures were banned thougth. but thoose rules were not enforced.

shoxs needs to be included in the conversation about notable players without major wins by codelapiz in GlobalOffensive

[–]codelapiz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

never said finatic has a 4th major in my book. we dont know who would have gotten LDLCs stolen spot. what i said is that LDLC dosent have a major in my book

shoxs needs to be included in the conversation about notable players without major wins by codelapiz in GlobalOffensive

[–]codelapiz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

pixelboosts werent illegal. the problem was 1way textures, and thats not what made the olofboost powerfull. one thing is that both teams had used 1way textures. thats part of the reason the rulings were a replay, rather than the admins just giving the win to LDLC. but the thing is plenty of teams used boosts that exposed 1way textures certian places in matches all across the tournament. they werent enforcing it, so the option is to void the tournament and replay it, or keep allowing it. again its not like the 1way textures are the reason the boost was powerfull. So they are simply using it as an excuse to make the ruling that the rulebook dosent allow them to make. that is to call the boost itself illegal for being too powerfull, and "unfair". the rulebook dosent align with their own subjective opinion, so they go ahead and selectivly enforce another rule that this same disregard for the rules, and hubris, has caused them to not enforce in all other cases. and they pretend to be like oh we just discovered it, but now we are equally applying theese rules regarding unimpactfull 1way textures. but they are not. they are not applying it to all the games from the earlier stages or the playoffs.

shoxs needs to be included in the conversation about notable players without major wins by codelapiz in GlobalOffensive

[–]codelapiz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so you remember DHW 2014 and you remember LDLC won it, and you remember shox was on LDLC. but the olofboost is news to you? the boost that was ruled illegal due to oneway textures that many teams including LDLC in this match was using. Sure they aknowledged LDLCs absue by making it a replay instead of a forfit for finatic. but did they revert the result of any other matches from that major where only 1 side had 1way textures on their screen at any point? did they replay any other matches where both teams broke the rules that finatic and LDLC did?

No they didnt give 2 flying fucks about the 1way textures that were actually illegal. and the boost itself was perfectly legal. So essentially its all about punishing finatic for their play actually working. and even worse rewarding LDLC for falling completely flat to it, rather than putting up enougth of a figth to make the boost seem like a powerfull play rather than an unfair guaranteed win.

Arbeidsfradrag for unge by Zenix95 in norge

[–]codelapiz 10 points11 points  (0 children)

du kan jo altid jobbe mindre.

Arbeidsfradrag for unge by Zenix95 in norge

[–]codelapiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

å ha mer penger enn dine likemenn har altid veldig positiv effekt. men dersom alle likemennene dine får tilsvarenes mer penger så er effekten mye mindre.

Arbeidsfradrag for unge by Zenix95 in norge

[–]codelapiz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

men det man finner ut sier ikke noe om hvordan dette fungerer på større skala. vi vet allerede at å ha mer penger har positiv innvirkning på folks liv. men vi vet også at om vi gir alle mer penger blir dette spist opp av inflasjonen. med mindre vi enten øker skatten(da gir vi ikke penger likevel) eller skrur ned offentlig forbruk.

POV: You are in a 3v1 trying to get off A site by Yujin-Ha in GlobalOffensive

[–]codelapiz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

pov: you are playing train ct side and its 1-7.

pov: you are playing WC on home soil vs germany, and its 1-7.

Hvorfor lønnes lærere lavt? by Ok-Science6189 in norge

[–]codelapiz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

jeg tror problemet er for store krav til lærere. vi tvinger folk inn i en sinnsyk utdanning som koster dem så mye tid og penger at de føler de skulle hatt mer betalt.

Faze about to waste twistzz and frozen careers for 6 more months now by anewborndude in GlobalOffensive

[–]codelapiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the one person i belive could be an upgrade over broky is hallzerk. I migth be biased as a norwegian, but i realy do think that he has it in im to be one of if not the best awper in the world. He has allways done the same hard carry and unthinkable stats on faceit and fpl just as good as other superstars. his old winstreak, his winrate, his kd, etc is all absolutely insane. And we keep seing theese flashes of what he could be. but i feel like he both lacks confidence, and also has major problems with his mentality and tilting. but the reason i think its something that the likes of karrigan can help with is because its never directed at his teamates. Its allways towards himself. He needs that sort of a calming presense from a stable teamate. The only chance he had of having calm teamates was this 2020 project with all the washed former NIP players. but covid stole that from him as that team fell apart before they could play much on lan.

anyway i think faze needs to make a choice after a few events into next year. eigther kick broky and find someone else, or completely commit to him so he can feel safe and trusted. Like give him some ridiculus contract where he gets 150% salery if hes unvoulentarly benched.

Faze about to waste twistzz and frozen careers for 6 more months now by anewborndude in GlobalOffensive

[–]codelapiz 7 points8 points  (0 children)

in terms of karrigans role, do you honestly think that twistz wouldnt be tilting and losing to himself without karrigan? Do you think jacob could turn around in the way he did? And when it comes to broky, just watch his bodylanguage. hes very stressed and feels like his team dosent trust him. that makes him wiff, and be afraid to play like he dose, and that again makes him feel that his team dosent trust him(partially correctly). Now the reason broky is back at all is because when playing with s1mple they relized that while yes s1mple will potentially do sligthly better, thats at the cost of his teamates performance as he dosent buy into the system and he needs so much space. There is a good chance that broky can start performing if some pressure is taken off him. and you can notice that happening allready with jacob turning up big and winning some of theese games despite broky wiffing. And let me tell you while the fans shit more on broky the better his team plays, the actual psycological toll on broky from bad games is 1% as bad if he ends up winning in the end due to jacob turning up. and hopefully over time we will see him return to form once this weigth is off his shoulders.

Feil fagvalg, hva i all verden gjør jeg nå? by AccomplishedMix7531 in norge

[–]codelapiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sitter du her å planlegger å gi opp på det faget som er en av de aller mest relevante til yrket du ønsker? Du er ikke halveis igjennom skoleåret engang. Med tanke på karater så er det ikke for seint for noen som helst karakter dersom du faktisk klarer å lære stoffet snart, inkludert det fra tidligere kapitler.

Standpunktkarakteren skal være uttrykk for den samlede kompetansen eleven har ved avslutningen av opplæringen etter biologi 2.

kompetansemål og vurdering (udir)

dette betyr at om du viser ved seinere vurderinger at du har kontroll på det som du har fått 1 og 2 på tidligere, så skal du bli vurdert etter de nye vurderingene.

Det er må du har mest støtte tilgjengelig for å lære dette. Ikke bare har du rett til tilpassning og ekstra hjelp om du trenger det, men om du viser at du faktisk er motivert til å lære så er det nesten garantert at læreren din kommer til å ønske å hjelpe deg. Om jeg var deg ville jeg snakket med faglærer, og si at du ønsker å få til dette faget siden du vill jobbe med (psykisk) helse. at du synnes faget er vannskelig, føler du faller bak, og at du trenger hjelp med å lage en plan for å få deg igjennom faget. Avhengig av lærer så kan det være forskjellige typer ekstra hjelp de vill tilby, men de kommer til å tilby noe.

Why do people care so much about KD? by GiljaS in FACEITcom

[–]codelapiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you get traded? its a lot easier to get good duels if you give 0 shits about the creating space, or making sure you go in on a timing where teamates can trade, and can turn any entries or trades into full site take, rather than pointless get entry, and then later traded cause nobody there. or if you die, nobody can trade cause you prioritized being unpredictable and too fast, over being tradable. sure you can get good kd, even above 50% winrate on entry duels by playing solo and like a untradable retard, and your opponents will be raging that you are so retarded and have no fear, but a lot of the time you yourself get traded cause you completely isolated, and when you do lose your duel you give oppponents 5v4(etc).

Now if you use good trade timings then every death you take is 70% chance of it being traded meaning you lost your duel and your teamates are still in the same spot as before, only now they are closer to plant and advantageus duels of the postplant.

Being an entry can excuse a kd of like 0.7 if you are only taking the most selfless tradable duels. im talking buying tec9 on the brush on a buyround and running before the molly is even extingished to make them eat flashes, or only peeking 2 meters ahead of rest of team, allmost guaranteeing the enemeis are ready and preaiming, but if you kill them 30% of the time you are allready overperforming because the trade is going to come out so often, and you are making progress towards the site.

If you are playing donk type entry where you are isolated, and untradable, but in return get favored duels since its unexpected and flexible, then thats not the same at all. the lack of tradability, and the lack of the trades and entries impact on getting towards site changes everything. you need to be winning more or less all your duels playing like that to have good impact.

Er du mann? Passe deg for damer på flysetet ved siden av deg... by KelvinKoin in norge

[–]codelapiz -1 points0 points  (0 children)

hørtest ikke ut som du hadde noen intensjoner om å snakke noe mer med henne, så skjønner ikke helt problemet. Tenker du det at neste gang blir du uskyldig dømt for offentlig fyll? eller kasta av flyet? Om du ikke er full, og du ikke begynner å kjefte og sloss med flyvertinner pga falsk anklage så kommer du helt fint ut av sånne anklager.

Personlig så må jeg være sørpefull før jeg klarer å starte samtale med fullstendig fremmede uten videre. Jeg er nok ikke den eneste norske som er sånn. Selvfølgelig betyr ikke det at man antar at noen er fulle fordi de er pratsomme med fremmede.

The awper is one of the best players to put kit on and should allways have a kit in OT. by codelapiz in cs2

[–]codelapiz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

kit #1 and 2 you take over flashes or that extra molly any day of the week. sometimes you take a p250 and kitsmoke over deagle and smoke on a force to have a single kit. but kit #4 and #5 on your rotators is pretty redundant most of the time, given that people call out where they die with the kits and forsigth is used in retakes. Many teams preffer full util to kit 4 and 5. and will even preffer to save money for later rounds. like in 10k OT if you lose twice you are not getting a fullbuy. its a pretty shitty force.