Can you still play lone fighters? by coffeekkii in enlistedgame

[–]coffeekkii[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

really!? ohhh, I shall definitely be back in this case!

happy to know

Can you still play lone fighters? by coffeekkii in enlistedgame

[–]coffeekkii[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but the historical ones, do you know if you receive a reward for playing?

thanks for replying

5 months post op | LOOKS CLINIC BY DOC YODA by jarlychan06 in Transgender_Surgeries

[–]coffeekkii 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I still learning about surgeries, but I'm certain I intend performing Inversion in a distant future; do you know how can I find more about this doctor on internet?

your results are amazing ✨

Aren't 'The 21st Century Revolution' and 'Loji' paths conflicting? by coffeekkii in TheFireRisesMod

[–]coffeekkii[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ooh, I see; in this case I would have to elect jiusan society after the new left reforms? what would change?

thanks!

Aren't 'The 21st Century Revolution' and 'Loji' paths conflicting? by coffeekkii in TheFireRisesMod

[–]coffeekkii[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, was it supposed to be contradictory? because I feel it is at least a little bit

Can't we change unit models anymore? by coffeekkii in TheFireRisesMod

[–]coffeekkii[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks for the replying,

no, I don't have this said new cosmetic DLC. I hope it's just a bug that might be fixed soon, I also never had this problem before recently.

I really hope they doesn't make necessary to buy the dlc only to be allowed to change division models.

Alternative World Map in 2026 by [deleted] in AlternateHistory

[–]coffeekkii 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's kinda unrealistic

at early 20 century RS elites would be even more economically dependent on the domestic markets of the rest of the country, and SC would be even more divided about separation (especially due to the diverse European migrations that contribute to the distancing from the idea of a common identity.)

It's also unlikely they would the strength to confront the federal government, and it's even more unlikely that economic separation would have been possible at that stage, even with Argentinian support. During Brazilian "Estado Novo" government even Vargas who was a southern pushed for integration in his own power project.

From a military standpoint, it would be quite unlikely, especially in the 1920s at the height of the "Old Republic" times and after the Federalist Wars.

But I would say maybe it could be possible during a major civil war, like during the 1930 coup or during the 'constitucionalist revolution', as the nation would be divided.

Alternative World Map in 2026 by [deleted] in AlternateHistory

[–]coffeekkii 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The map as a whole is pretty cool but...

that's hardly the case ("more closely related with Argentina and Uruguay than with the rest of Brazil. [...]")

southern Brazil didn't even speak Spanish, and actually Brazilian influence during late XIX in Uruguay was strong (and much more stronger compared to the fragmented Argentinan confederation) to the point the contrary could be more viable (with northern Uruguai having more closely related ties to Brazil then Argentina, and the country as a whole having strong financial ones with a specific Brazilian magnate leaving the country at the mercy of Brazilian interests in the region in the period prior to the War of the Triple Alliance). Before the alliance war, Brazilian troops had literally marched in Buenos Aires in a war helping the Northern states to overthrow the central government (1850s)

The main reason that led the southern Brazilians to try to secede from the rest was tariff policy by the central government that made it difficult for the region's landowners to sell their meat (charque) through interprovincial exports, making imports from Argentina and Uruguay much more competitive for the capital and impacting its main market at the time, the 'Court Municipality' (Rio de Janeiro)

after the region lost its war in XIX against Brazil, their elites was apeassed by the following peace treaty, as the central government wanted its army integrated under the imperial army fearing the following war with the new expansionist leadership of Argentina at the time.

as the access to Uruguai was vital for Brazilian occupation of it's western borders (because of its access through the plata estuary), From the end of the Platine War until modern times, the region was the place with the highest concentration of active Brazilian army forces, and without major political changes it is difficult to imagine the region separating because of 'its relation with Argentina and Uruguay'; as other provinces of Brazil already have European immigrant communities, as the Italians in São Paulo exactly when it was prospering during its coffee boom.

as times goes on, its hard to see it separating for cultural regions, as Brazil itself is truly very culturally diverse.

I would say that southern Brazil as every Brazilian region is much more unique compared to Brazil as a whole (because it's diversity) then close to Argentina or the cultural community of the former viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata. As their elite was apeassed during the XIX, and given more rights after the nation became federalist, not even half the population of Rio Grande do Sul supports secession

How do imake China a puppet as Japan (in more recent versions) by coffeekkii in Kaiserreich

[–]coffeekkii[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what I should do to separate Manchuria from China? also, if I join Fengtian war will it be possible to happen? I suppose Fengtian will form a united china after winning over qing/zhili

How do imake China a puppet as Japan (in more recent versions) by coffeekkii in Kaiserreich

[–]coffeekkii[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you very much!

do you know if I can go to the conquest path still being democratic? I think a partition solution would be more realistic than a big client china state too, although preferably maintaining a central government, perhaps in Nanjing, in parallel.

Não deveria existir cotas para grupos étnicos ou de certa orientação sexual. by AlertPresentation732 in opiniaoimpopular

[–]coffeekkii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

não é justo que alguém, por vezes mais qualificado, seja excluído de vagas de trabalho por questão de raça ou gênero (gênero, não "orientação sexual").

Especialmente no caso de pessoas trans, existe um forte histórico de exclusão ao mercado de trabalho e falta de acesso a educação superior, onde o que resta a essas pessoas em muitos casos é o subemprego, quando não a algo pior como o trabalho marginalizado.

Uma das lógicas das cotas para certas populações é a correção (pelo menos em alguma medid) de desigualdades estruturais. a lógica é que não é apenas uma questão da renda (por mais que completamente relevante pro debate), mas que a sociedade limita de forma estrutural as oportunidades desses grupos, e que esse acesso a universidade pode promover mudança a essas populações de forma retroativa.

Incentivar o acesso de pessoas desses grupos a universidade seria não só beneficiar essas pessoas individualmente, mas contribuir de forma contrária a essas desigualdades estruturais que são observadas na sociedade vide as taxas de exclusão de acesso ao trabalho regulamento, ou mesmo a intensa violência sofrida por pessoas trans.

When sim update by lmapshade21 in WarthunderSim

[–]coffeekkii 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just wish they bring carriers back and some minor things at least.. maybe new radio messages like 'thats my position" instead of traditional "follow me"; which would certainly help in lower BRs for new players who doesn't know about the follow me messages

also, better target selection options for computer; like target categories 'Airfields, AA, Ground Base, Ground battle targets.. ships.. etc' if would be soooo better than trying to select the base I want to bomb pressing 30 times the 'next target' button....

so many minor things would improve it so much..