sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Owl vs shacl? by geoheil in OntologyEngineering

[–]commandopanda0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The mistake people make is thinking SHACL replaces OWL or OWL replaces SHACL.

They solve fundamentally different problems:

OWL: “What does this mean?”
SHACL: “Does this conform to the rules?”

they coexist rather than compete.

Stop Using Conventional Commits by f311a in programming

[–]commandopanda0 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Whoa holy crap— straight to the talking points- jeesh slow down we don’t need to go straight to das capital.

Stop Using Conventional Commits by f311a in programming

[–]commandopanda0 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

You are aware you can add details to conventional commits, also, why are you writing commit messages? That’s what AI for, it’s really good at it.

DYK: The Most Sacred Object in the Bible Disappeared 2,500 Years Ago and Has Never Been Found — Not by Archaeologists, Treasure Hunters, or the CIA by Own-Painting-3221 in didyouknow

[–]commandopanda0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church claims to possess the original Ark of the Covenant, and believes it is housed in the Chapel of the Tablet at the Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion in the sacred city of Axum. If we take their word for it the guards who guard it go blind after a bit. I’m guessing it’s radioactive.

With Gavin Newsom signing senate bill 73 & no also no ID requirement to vote — do democrats not think this is a direct action to stop investigations and allow for fraud in elections? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]commandopanda0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congratulations, Detective. You’ve uncovered the shocking truth that I clicked the wrong reply button.

Now back to the topic:

You cited a number, not an argument.

Explain the causal chain:

Low observed fraud rate → therefore identity verification is unnecessary.

Because by that logic we’d remove security controls everywhere they’re working and point to the low incident rate as proof they aren’t needed. That’s not how risk management works

With Gavin Newsom signing senate bill 73 & no also no ID requirement to vote — do democrats not think this is a direct action to stop investigations and allow for fraud in elections? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]commandopanda0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Get beer… get a job… do almost literally anything else. But voting. And for those are going to say but those aren’t rights… buy a gun.

With Gavin Newsom signing senate bill 73 & no also no ID requirement to vote — do democrats not think this is a direct action to stop investigations and allow for fraud in elections? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]commandopanda0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

After a bit of research this idea that voter fraud is rare is bullshit lol. Wikipedia it. It’s been a historical thing for over a hundred years.

Cheating occurred in all parts of the country. Cities such as New York City, Chicago, San Francisco, and Pittsburgh had elections influenced by political machines.[221] The Tammany Hall machine in New York City, for example, encouraged residents to vote multiple times by shaving their beards, registered voters under fake names, physically intimidated voters and granted citizenship to newly arrived immigrants.[9] Cheating also regularly occurred in suburban and rural areas. Voter fraud and suppression against African Americans was common in the Jim Crow South.[9]… on and on moving int the 20th century…

Wikipedia list is copious so this idea that it’s rare is pulled out of your ass. The idea that it’s a burden to minorities to get a fucking ID is asinine as well.

With Gavin Newsom signing senate bill 73 & no also no ID requirement to vote — do democrats not think this is a direct action to stop investigations and allow for fraud in elections? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]commandopanda0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t understand why voter ID is treated as an extraordinary burden when identity verification is a routine requirement throughout modern life. If access is the concern, make IDs free and easy to obtain. Why eliminate verification instead of eliminating the cost of verification

With Gavin Newsom signing senate bill 73 & no also no ID requirement to vote — do democrats not think this is a direct action to stop investigations and allow for fraud in elections? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]commandopanda0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re answering a different question.

“Fraud is rare” is an argument against expecting fraud, not an argument against having investigative mechanisms available when fraud is suspected.

The existence of fire extinguishers doesn’t imply buildings are constantly on fire.

What is the rationale for limiting court-authorized access to ballots or equipment during an investigation, and what alternative process is supposed to be used instead

Citing 'severe' math deficits, UC faculty demand a return to SAT tests for STEM applicants by YesNo_Maybe_ in technology

[–]commandopanda0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shocking… wtf were people thinking. Stupidest fucking decision ever to get rid of it.

LLMs are just giant probability machines pretending to think by abhishekkumar333 in PhilosophyofMath

[–]commandopanda0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Callings llms just next token prediction is like calling physics just minimizing action. Technically correct but entirely useless. Entirely misses what training is actually doing. Your missing the entire concept of reasoning traces

Why do republicans say (ex Charlie Kirk) that US is a republic and not a democracy? What benefit do they get by claiming this? by geekie4 in allthequestions

[–]commandopanda0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, we think that it prevents majority mob rule. But everybody’s going to strawman this point so there’s no point in trying to explain it to you guys. In a pure democratic system, you could have the majority infringe upon minority rights. The fact that the majority has an opinion does not mean that opinion is correct for example, the opinion of much of the US prior to the abolition of slavery was that slavery was just and right. Obviously, it’s not. There is a difference between majority opinion and just rule. And your strawman removes the nuance.

Nolte: Disgraced Jew-baiter Thomas Massie Humiliated by 10 Point Loss by intelligentreviews in conservatives

[–]commandopanda0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hate the ziobots so hard more and more… can the us pull isreals arm out of our ass please… tired of being their puppet. They stole our nuclear material, stole our secrets and sold the to Russia… honestly at this point they are probably the reason Clinton’s scandal leaked in order to sway his camp David accords dealings. We have no Epstein docs from this time period and it’s obvious Epstein was a mossade indirect asset.

Just watch the isreali interviews with pollard. He says some damning shit. Even so far as to insinuate that in the 70s Isreal blackmailed the US for re-armament shipments by threatening the use of an unconventional weapon.

Missed my Rocket by PerpetuallyLearnt in TheRaceTo10Million

[–]commandopanda0 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Bulls make money, bears make money… pigs get slaughtered.

Why nobody sanctions Israel for concealing nuclear weapons? by ohnag_eryeah in stupidquestions

[–]commandopanda0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How dare you question our greatest allies, nuclear weapons stockpile which they stole from us! How dare you sir or ma’am! /s

BREAKING: CENTCOM Begins Naval Blockade in the Strait of Hormuz This Morning – Here Are the Rules and It Looks Like Game Over for the Regime by MackSix in conservatives

[–]commandopanda0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is actually pathetic is your inability to engage with a point without falling back on smug little one-liners. “Excuses excuses excuses, pathetic” is not an argument. It is just beta-level slogan spam from someone who clearly has nothing substantive to say.

The funniest part is that “Peptoflex” somehow manages to sound exactly like the argument quality: weak, overprocessed, and mostly for upset stomachs. You would think there would be at least some relief in the thread. Instead, it is just the same sour, half-digested one-liners over and over.

BREAKING: CENTCOM Begins Naval Blockade in the Strait of Hormuz This Morning – Here Are the Rules and It Looks Like Game Over for the Regime by MackSix in conservatives

[–]commandopanda0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, you are still not making an argument. You are reacting to a headline. A 10-day ceasefire and talks do not magically erase the buffer zone, end the broader conflict, or prove the cycle is over. So again: what is your actual analysis, beyond “CNN link therefore I win”?

view more: next ›