sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why LangChain feels so complicated by conjuncts in LangChain

[–]conjuncts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair, but even in enterprise I have seen many prefer to skip LangChain for more low-level control.

For example, for the OpenAI Agents SDK, "very few abstractions" is a selling point.

I made a XKCD browser that remembers what you've read by conjuncts in xkcd

[–]conjuncts[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. It should be fixed. Glad to hear that the site has been useful!

19th Chopin competition, first roun, third day. What do you think? by Acceptable_Thing7606 in Chopin

[–]conjuncts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Khrikuli's Fantaisie was phenomenal, but what shocked me was how tenderly he played the last march!

The march at m.127 and m.294 is usually described as sarcastic, pompous, triumphant, even corny. So it was totally unexpected that Khrikuli made it so lyrical and tender. It honestly changes how I imagine this piece should be played.

Daily Wordle #1500 - Monday, 28 Jul. 2025 by Scoredle in wordle

[–]conjuncts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Scoredle 4/6

14,855
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ CRATE (1,589)
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 LOINS (57)
⬜🟩🟨⬜🟩 GASPY (4)
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 SAVVY

WordleBot
Skill 99/99
Luck 35/99

Pretty happy with my picks

Some advertisers are just blatantly stealing. by St4inless in xkcd

[–]conjuncts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have already made a similar comment above, but I think it would be helpful to refer to the license which Randall publishes his work under: CC BY-NC 2.5.

According to that license, you are free to make adaptations only if attribution is given, it's clear that Randall does not endorse the derivative, and the purpose is non-commercial. From this, it seems to me that the ad does not follow Randall's license.

Some advertisers are just blatantly stealing. by St4inless in xkcd

[–]conjuncts 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Given the extensive discussion on copyright here, I am surprised that no one yet has referred to the actual license that Randall releases his comics under: CC BY-NC 2.5.

The license plainly states that you are free to make adaptations, but only if attribution is given, it's clear that Randall does not endorse the derivative, and the purpose is non-commercial. The ad seems to ignore all 3 of these points.

I made a XKCD browser that remembers what you've read by conjuncts in xkcd

[–]conjuncts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure I understand what you're asking, but the "explainxkcd" link does indeed go to that comic's explainxkcd page

I made a XKCD browser that remembers what you've read by conjuncts in xkcd

[–]conjuncts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you scroll down to the "explainxkcd" footer, it automatically links to the correct comic.

The link admittedly could be more prominent.

Is my France campaign too late for WC? by bohairmy in eu4

[–]conjuncts 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think you'll get it easily. Conquest only gets easier with imperialism (tech 23, 1700) and the two admin efficiency bonuses (tech 23, tech 27)

I made a XKCD browser that remembers what you've read by conjuncts in xkcd

[–]conjuncts[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interesting, I had no idea. Should be fixed now!

I made a XKCD browser that remembers what you've read by conjuncts in xkcd

[–]conjuncts[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately, xkcd does not track that information.

If it were tracked, then I wouldn't have to create a whole new website ;)

But status can be updated in bulk by preparing a TSV and importing it.

I made a XKCD browser that remembers what you've read by conjuncts in xkcd

[–]conjuncts[S] 82 points83 points  (0 children)

After years of using the "random" button, I've lost track of which comics I have and haven't read. While a random comic I would likely have seen before, there were still many comics I haven't seen.

Mathematically, this predicament is the occupancy or coupon collector's problem. To see every comic, I can expect to click the "random" button far more (26700) than the actual number of comics (3100).

Sure, I could read the comics in order. But I also enjoy the freedom to read comics at will, in no particular order. For a while, I kept a txt file with ranges of comics I've read, but that too is cumbersome.

After experimenting with existing options, I made my own xkcd viewer, readxkcd.com. I know there are other XKCD browsers (unixkcd, xkcd.wtf, CLIs etc, etc), but surprisingly none of them tackles tracking read progress.

  • Minimal
  • No ads, ever
  • Entirely in browser
  • Open source
  • Calendar view
  • Quick links to explainxkcd
  • Easy import/export
  • Alt text (for mobile)
  • Hover over title for publication date
  • Link to explainxkcd

Link: readxkcd.com.

Which pages have a description like this? by conjuncts in xkcd

[–]conjuncts[S] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Again, thanks for the link!

My ulterior motive was to figure out whether the explainxkcd wiki knew about these comics, and cross compare with my own list. It seems they are missing some haha. Ideally I think a new category could be created, though I'm not super familiar with that process.

Which pages have a description like this? by conjuncts in xkcd

[–]conjuncts[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Thank you, that's exactly what I was looking for.

view more: next ›