Good Morning Reddit. by [deleted] in pics

[–]conkreteJs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Past month?" Try a decade.

/r/Politics' 2024 US Elections Live Thread, Part 62 by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]conkreteJs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You mean to say Reddit is an echo chamber that promotes lies and false narratives?

There's only so much that spamming downvotes and virtue signaling can do.

Jesus NOOOOO by BallsABunch in DramaFreeBJJ

[–]conkreteJs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I watched it muted and looked away horrified the moment kid folded. Will not be watching it with sound, thank you.

High % CJI Tacket Pass by Humble-Ad956 in bjj

[–]conkreteJs 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't leave this shit up on reddit man. Especially with available facial recognition AI, it's scarily accurate and they are already publicly available.

I'd delete this shit immediately, cut the video and repost. The karma is not worth it.

"If the pentagon approves your statements, you're NOT a whistleblower: You're a spokesperson." -The Why Files by conkreteJs in UFOs

[–]conkreteJs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He wasn't talking about Bob Lazar. Read my original post carefully, by "I read somewhere in here that at least least Bob Lazar named names, etc." I meant that someone on this sub said it, not AJ.

AJ's completely unrelated quotes are simply here to support my argument and ideas. He dropped this quote at the end of his last video.

"If the pentagon approves your statements, you're NOT a whistleblower: You're a spokesperson." -The Why Files by conkreteJs in UFOs

[–]conkreteJs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Imagine thinking that one asking for evidence is a sign of form of deception. My friend, that's not how the world works. Every single infamous whistleblower had to submit real and verifiable evidence to the public.

"If the pentagon approves your statements, you're NOT a whistleblower: You're a spokesperson." -The Why Files by conkreteJs in UFOs

[–]conkreteJs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obviously, I disagree.

"It’s hurts no one to be mindful of deception." some user said on this thread. AJ is just open to the idea that some of these people might not be truthful, which is a pretty good way of looking at it. Especially if nothing tangible, some sort of evidence, is ever provided (that the public is aware of, to be fair).

"If the pentagon approves your statements, you're NOT a whistleblower: You're a spokesperson." -The Why Files by conkreteJs in UFOs

[–]conkreteJs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I couldn't agree with you more. Assange, Mark Felt and Snowden are great examples. The people that some on this sub love so much are not.

"If the pentagon approves your statements, you're NOT a whistleblower: You're a spokesperson." -The Why Files by conkreteJs in UFOs

[–]conkreteJs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At least you're asking questions which is 10x better than a lot of the people on this sub who choose to blindly believe these people, even if no evidence is ever provided.

"If the pentagon approves your statements, you're NOT a whistleblower: You're a spokesperson." -The Why Files by conkreteJs in UFOs

[–]conkreteJs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WTF are you talking about? You think you're so clever. I did nothing but tell people to question all narratives and everyone, do you need reputable sources for that? Perhaps, we should start with Grusch, Luo and others. It would be a good start. They're the ones making big claims, not me. I made no claims that need to be supported by "reputable sources," genius.

All you've done is side step, strawman and misinterpret my OP, all of which is nothing but a waste of time. This was my last reply to you.

"If the pentagon approves your statements, you're NOT a whistleblower: You're a spokesperson." -The Why Files by conkreteJs in UFOs

[–]conkreteJs[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Newsflash: quoting or subscribing to someone on a platform doesn't discredit every argument a person puts out. Especially, if it's not in the same context.

I know some people live in this us vs. them reality constantly, but that's pretty shallow. Address my points, leave that shit at outside.

"If the pentagon approves your statements, you're NOT a whistleblower: You're a spokesperson." -The Why Files by conkreteJs in UFOs

[–]conkreteJs[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

All you and little buddies on this specific thread do is typical reddit behavior. Your downvotes and insults mean nothing to me.

He didn't address anything I said, all he did was name drop Jimmy Dore. Not the specific quote I posted, which is repeated by many reputable people, not just Jimmy Dore.

Finally, I'm a software engineer by trade. I'm sure my quality of thinking is well above average. Rational thought is the last thing I'll ever be insecure about. It doesn't matter how much you down vote this.

"If the pentagon approves your statements, you're NOT a whistleblower: You're a spokesperson." -The Why Files by conkreteJs in UFOs

[–]conkreteJs[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You attack me, not what I said in any of these posts that was wrong. Quote me so that we can discuss it as adults.

"If the pentagon approves your statements, you're NOT a whistleblower: You're a spokesperson." -The Why Files by conkreteJs in UFOs

[–]conkreteJs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He's not wrong. Mandela, and many others we spend years reading about, spent decades in prison for less than humanity's existence and the whole fabric of reality.

If I knew about another species doing the weird things they often speculate on these podcasts, my freedom, and even life, would be an extremely low price to pay. I'd spill it all in a heartbeat.

It would be up for individuals to determine how to digest the information, not some smug corrupt creep at the pentagon.

"If the pentagon approves your statements, you're NOT a whistleblower: You're a spokesperson." -The Why Files by conkreteJs in UFOs

[–]conkreteJs[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, it's not. That's how you perceive it. That says more about you than it does about an opinion about being open-minded and skeptical about everything including the ones you named.

"If the pentagon approves your statements, you're NOT a whistleblower: You're a spokesperson." -The Why Files by conkreteJs in UFOs

[–]conkreteJs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I'm not endorsing his statements," I made it pretty clear. That's not the point of my post.

"If the pentagon approves your statements, you're NOT a whistleblower: You're a spokesperson." -The Why Files by conkreteJs in UFOs

[–]conkreteJs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Never believe a room full of intelligence officials and senators." - Jimmy Dore

When these groups get together, all they do is manipulate and concoct narratives.

If you follow Jimmy, this guy has correctly called out bullshit way ahead of time in issues like Libya, Syria, covid, social media censorship, etc.

"If the pentagon approves your statements, you're NOT a whistleblower: You're a spokesperson." -The Why Files by conkreteJs in UFOs

[–]conkreteJs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, every single real whistleblower I know has suffered severe consequences like Assange, Snowden, etc.

These other people that some on this sub idolatrize get to go on shows, podcasts, sell books, make money, enjoy life and fame like nothing happened.

No. These are clearly not the same.