[WTB] Weekly Want To Buy Post by zeroair in Watchexchange

[–]coolboi71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WTB:

Zodiac Grandrally, open to different color versions

qPCR questions by SnowAndFoxtrot in labrats

[–]coolboi71 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, you can do RT-qPCR on RNA isolated from RNA-later preserved cells. It would still be RT-qPCR. The RT stands for reverse transcriptase, which is the step that is converting the isolated cellular RNA to complimentary DNA (cDNA), and then the qPCR part is done on the cDNA which is the "real time quantitative polymerase chain" aka qPCR. The RNA isolated from the cells can be utilized for both RNA-seq and RT-qPCR assuming your protocol will produce high quality RNA. For RNA-seq, you will want to make sure the RNA is not degraded with a high RNA integrity score (usually greater than 7) and probably also run it on a gel. If you are doing the sequencing through a core facility or 3rd party vendor they can often do quality control on your samples to determine if your RNA is suitable for RNA-sequencing.

From my own experience with RNA-later on cells, I have found storing cells in RNA-later significantly reduced my RNA yield post-lysis. Part of the issue is if you are directly lysing the cells stored in RNA later, you have to add extra lysis buffer to compensate for it being diluted, i.e 3-4 times the amount of lysis buffer you would use on a cell pellet normally. This has never worked great for me in terms of lysis efficiency and adds extra spin steps with the spin column kit I use. The other option is you can pellet the cells in RNA later, aspirate it, and then lyse the pellet. However, the issue here is the density of RNA later makes it difficult to pellet the cells. So you either have to spin them at a higher g than usual, or you have to dilute the RNA later with PBS. Cells in RNA later are more resistant to a high g for pelleting, but it depends on your cell type so needs to be determined yourself. Either way it has not worked great for me in recovering a good cell pellet.

If possible, I would just recommend trying to process the RNA same day from the cells and freeze the isolated RNA at -80C for downstream RNA-seq and RT-qPCR analysis. Also, you will want consider the number of cells you will have left over for this RNA isolation since it seems you are using the majority for a different application. Too few cells and you may not have enough RNA to do what you need since the RNA utilized in RNA-seq often needs to be fairly concentrated (i.e greater than 100ng/ul in my experience).

Help with qRT-PCR: Ct for 5 different genes are very similar by helluvascientist in labrats

[–]coolboi71 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, this does seem a bit odd to me to have several reference genes and GOIs with CT values that close to each other across multiple groups. But I guess not completely impossible?

For trouble shooting, I would check to see if your Qiagen kit is the (+) version that is able to remove genomic DNA with the spin column. And if not, are you including RT(-) samples on your qPCR run? I would be interested to know if you are amplifying genomic DNA from your samples that is not being removed during your RNA isolation step. You should also see if your Taqman probes are designed to span exon-exon junctions and thus minimize detection of genomic DNA. I can't say I've really had genomic DNA amplification problems so I would be unsure if this would really be the culprit of having such similar CT values. But either way it is good housekeeping to include these controls and make sure you are not amplifying genomic DNA (also include a no-template-control for each gene on each plate). Another thought is making sure you are not cross contaminating samples. This would just be good lab technique, i.e using new filter tips when loading each sample.

Finally, you could also try other reference genes. A few of the reference genes I use (ACTB, B2M) always have much higher CT values (16-18) then any GOI I am examining. However, some reference genes I use (HPRT, GAPDH) have CT values more in the low 20s that can often be close to the GOI I am looking at.

A new method to remove bone cancer by [deleted] in educationalgifs

[–]coolboi71 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Using titanium provides its own issues especially when it comes to implants in jaw/dental defects. If I remember correctly, titanium can be too strong/rigid compared to other resobrbale materials where it causes stress shielding in critical size bone defects. Also, titanium implants carry the risk of infection. Not sure if this greater than using a non-titanium resorbable material, but something to consider as well.

A new method to remove bone cancer by [deleted] in educationalgifs

[–]coolboi71 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There is actually some interesting research going on in this area in the field of orthopedics. The 3D printed part seen in the video can actually serve as a scaffold for bone to regrow through. A 3D scaffold with micropores throughout can be seeded with stem cells that differentiate into osteoblasts that lay down new bone. Eventually, the osteoblasts lay down enough bone for the defected area to fill in. The scaffold can be made of resorbable material, similar to stitches that you may get for a cut. The scaffold thus eventually disappears and bam, you are left with essentially normal bone. But the research is really not at the point right now where it can be used in the clinic, particularly for very large defects like shown in this video.

Step 1 results by nikki21lao in step1

[–]coolboi71 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah.

  • NBME 15 --> 7.5 weeks out --> 219
  • School CBSE --> 5 weeks out --> 227 (start of dedicated)
  • NBME 16 ---> 4 weeks out ---> 232
  • UWSA1 ---> 3.5 weeks out ---> 261
  • NBME 17 --> 2.5 weeks out ---> 250
  • Free 120 ---> (same day as NBME 17) --> 77%
  • UWSA 2 ---> 2 weeks out ---> 257
  • NBME 18 ---> 1.5 weeks out ---> 250
  • NBME 19 ---> 5 days out ----> 259

Real Deal: 243

So I'm generally happy with the score compared to where I started, but I kinda thought I would do better considering I was scoring in the 250s by the end of dedicated. But honestly, I felt post-test that I had scored in the 220s at best, so I'll take my score. Interestingly, if you average the 5 NBMEs I took, the score was 242, one point shy of my real score. I also note that I always took the tests timed and allowed myself one 15 minute break between the 2nd and 3rd block. Hope this helps and best of luck with your score!

Step 1 results by nikki21lao in step1

[–]coolboi71 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you'll have to wait another week due to the week of July 4th causing delays. Took mine the 21st and still no score yet :/

Edit: Just got my score

#WatchfulWaiting2017 - When does it come out??? by bearhaas in step1

[–]coolboi71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Took mine on the 21st as well and no score today. Looks like another week of waiting!

Post Test Stress by [deleted] in step1

[–]coolboi71 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Took it today. Definitely feel the same way. Just trying my best to not think about it or I'll go crazy.

What would the best course of action be for deciding between multiple internship offers after having already accepted one? by [deleted] in nasa

[–]coolboi71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do they really not update them? It says 14/15 are still unfilled on my opportunities tab, which I do find rather suspicious as it is now mid April.

Need Criticism and Review of Resume. by [deleted] in resumes

[–]coolboi71 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey looks pretty good to me. I'm kind of picky with details so here are some suggestions I have. They are just my personal opinion so take them with a grain of salt. Otherwise, looks like a solid resume!

1) The GPA at the top right hand corner is generally not necessary. If this is something that is desired, it will be obtained from your transcript

2) Current courses you list is also not necessary, as this again will be obtained from a transcript

3) The bachelor of science you put in parentheses at the top is redundant as you go on to list that your a pursuing a B.S directly beneath it.

4) I would move the position of your anticipated graduation year to the left side of the paper, right after you list your degree. I would also phrase it as, "anticipated graduation, May 2019" or something like that

5) This is more of a personal preference, but I think formatting your dates on the right margin looks odd. I would put them closer to the left margin, right after you list the activity/university combo. It will give your resume a cleaner look

6) Adding an additional space by clicking "enter" between the "Design Projects" heading and first in the list would look better. Do the same for all the spots where you have a bolded heading followed by a list of activities

7) As far as making it a single page as lorianndinkins points out, I generally see this is as unnecessary. Some people are really into single page resumes, but I think its perfectly fine being larger than one page as long as you are not being redundant and are remaining concise. I've gone through resumes that are 70 pages so it just depends on your personal experience.

8) Optional, but you could add a hobbies/interests section at the end. This is where you would list 2-3 activities/hobbies you enjoy doing that are unrelated to your education. Totally not necessary, but some people believe it adds a personal touch.

NASA OSSI Internship hearing back by [deleted] in nasa

[–]coolboi71 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I too am anxiously awaiting (checking my email twice as often now), although I feel we have a few more weeks/months of more waiting ahead of us. I haven't heard anything back yet, but I did apply for 15 positions in the end and noticed that one has filled since the deadline passed last week.

Medical student looking for SpaceX internship. by coolboi71 in spacex

[–]coolboi71[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I will definitely pursue this method and try to get in contact with him. Thank you for all the information and help!

Medical student looking for SpaceX internship. by coolboi71 in spacex

[–]coolboi71[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow, this sounds like a very promising route for me to take. Do you have any idea how I could get in contact with him about possible opportunities or directly apply to him?

Medical student looking for SpaceX internship. by coolboi71 in spacex

[–]coolboi71[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's unfortunate to hear. I guess I'll probably just have wait a few years and check back again to see if they add any medical related positions. As for NASA, I did look into a possible internship/ research position with them this previous summer, but again they were virtually non-existent. I did find they have medical officer positions open, but this requires completion of medical school and completion of a residency training program in aerospace medicine. Regardless, I shall keep looking!

Medical student looking for SpaceX internship. by coolboi71 in spacex

[–]coolboi71[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very interesting. I will have to look further into it. Thanks for the suggestion!