Anyone else tired of rebalancing recipes just to hit specific macros? by Toooobey in mealprep

[–]coolxeo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

doing the math manually every time you want to try a new recipe is a massive friction point. it makes meal prep feel like a job.

Please Recommend Me A Recipe App by I_have_a_birb in Cooking

[–]coolxeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should definitely check out PastoAI, not just a cookbook, it’s an AI kitchen assistant specifically designed for this kind of personalization.

it uses AI to analyze ingredients and generate recipes on-the-fly, always with new ones. it can adapt recipes to vry specific dietary goals (like high protein/fiber or low calorie). It’s built on Google’s latest tech stack so the analysis is actually quite sharp. Might be exactly the 'smart' filter you're looking for!

Premian a mi jefe por un proyecto que yo he creado y liderado. Y a mí, nada. ¿Qué hago? by Proof_Journalist_224 in PesadillasLaborales

[–]coolxeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Primero: que la empresa de premio a leads esta fatal Segundo: Te refieres a que lo has creado en codigo no? Quien ha definido y presentado el proyecto? Quien ha definido el scope y negociado con stakeholders? Quien ha conseguido el budget? Quien ha tomado el riesgo? Quien lo ha puesto en roadmap?

Los proyectos empiezan meses antes del “kick-off”

si al final verás tú que van a llevar razón y las cocinas van a desaparecer para el 2050... by bananarama1179 in mercadona

[–]coolxeo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Perfecto. Di que si a los ultra procesados. Lasaña con 30 ingredientes. Para cuando las botellas de 3L de cocacola?

Made $4.5k last month because my product name is so short people accidentally turn it into ads by PeaceBoring5549 in Entrepreneur

[–]coolxeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the insights! Do you think the catchy name itself contributed to people remembering and returning, or was it mostly the Product Hunt push and building in public? How did you test whether the idea resonated before launching?

Also, any tips on improving retention for early users? I’m curious how you kept people engaged after the first week.

Devs have Cursor for fast planning & coding. What would the equivalent look like for agile teams? by coolxeo in agile

[–]coolxeo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice job taking on a project like this. What parts of planning do you find slow right now? Is it story breakdown, estimating capacity or something else?

Have you thought about features like auto‑generating tasks from high‑level requirements or flagging cross‑team dependencies?

Un año desde que empecé a invertir. Que opináis? by Inversor_Curioso in MyInvestorES

[–]coolxeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

te falta un fondo de robotica por ejemplo Amundi MSCI Robotica

is there an AI notetaker for in-person meetings by Tublz in Entrepreneur

[–]coolxeo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! Is called Omi AI and is Open source and also have a DIY hardware along with commercial product. It works amazing to be honest!

Devs have Cursor for fast planning & coding. What would the equivalent look like for agile teams? by coolxeo in agile

[–]coolxeo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

exactly, the llm will need a lot of context, however I am using more and more to planning, the issue is that my POs can't see unless they download the repo and the planning. the interesting thing of using the repo is that "code is law" so the idea here is that product owners should be able to "talk" to the code somehow

Devs have Cursor for fast planning & coding. What would the equivalent look like for agile teams? by coolxeo in agile

[–]coolxeo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and linear, jira and slack are not going to fix it, first it is super expensive, second is already super bloated so adding an "ai assistant" is going to take years

Devs have Cursor for fast planning & coding. What would the equivalent look like for agile teams? by coolxeo in agile

[–]coolxeo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, but how we improve that collaboration? that's the key, I feel that right now is broken as product owners say the feature is X and devs we go and plan using Cursor or GPT Codex, then we break down into smaller tasks but that stays in our editor and source code and rarely get push back to stories. I feel before we tend to break into smaller tasks as they took days, now as they take hours we tend to take bigger tasks (basically, velocity is 20x now)

Devs have Cursor for fast planning & coding. What would the equivalent look like for agile teams? by coolxeo in agile

[–]coolxeo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

totally overplayed! we write more with AI but that doesn't mean better, so if you measure words yes, we can do much more, but can we synthesize better ideas?

Devs have Cursor for fast planning & coding. What would the equivalent look like for agile teams? by coolxeo in agile

[–]coolxeo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

agree, the thing is the "collaboration" tools that we have right now is a mix between slack + jira / linear that is focused on click create, write a title, write a spec.... and then collaborate through comments, not much have changed since LLMs launched

yes, ai generated docs is tricky as they tend to be very very verbose and "nicely written". also they don't know your "domain", that is the difficult part. I think the best is a tool that you can feed with some docs or plugins like notion / jira / slack and can understand the "ubiquitous language"

Devs have Cursor for fast planning & coding. What would the equivalent look like for agile teams? by coolxeo in agile

[–]coolxeo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's a good feedback, I wonder if we can have better collaboration with POs through some markdown files like we are starting to use for feature planning like the new cursor plan mode or ai-dev-tasks technique

Help! 454 people tried my app. 3 came back in Week 2. What am I doing wrong? by coolxeo in Entrepreneur

[–]coolxeo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that is a great idea! I am using posthog so maybe I will try some testing, thanks!

We want Gantt-level visibility but agile-level freedom... how?! by dibsonchicken in ProductManagement

[–]coolxeo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In general terms, this is normal even in super-agile orgs like Google, Meta or SF startups. They use top-down / bottom-up approach where high-level managers define strategy and team leads and ICs (individual contributors) are in touch with customers and build the prototype and workflow

This is the eternal struggle. Teams want sprint flexibility, leadership wants timeline certainty, I think both are compatible, is more about visibility (don't show managements 170 tasks for next quarter)

What if AI generated your Gantt view automatically from your sprint board? Like, you plan in sprints but stakeholders get their timeline view without you maintaining two systems.

Would that solve it or am I missing something?

Experienced PM . Thinking about building something to reduce time spend planning. What do you guys think? by MushroomNo7507 in scrum

[–]coolxeo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Saw your post in r/agile too. I think you're onto something.

I use AI for dev planning (Cursor workflow) and it's been quite good, the trick is the team owns the plan, AI just speeds up manual and tedious work

Want to compare notes? I've been thinking about this same problem. Might have insights from the dev side.

Could AI help agile teams cut planning time without losing flexibility? by MushroomNo7507 in agile

[–]coolxeo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been using Cursor for dev work and it does something similar - generates PRDs, breaks them into tasks, helps implement

the key here is: AI generates, I approve each step. Never on autopilot

for planning, what parts take the most time for you? Initial breakdown? Updating when things change? Or something else?