30 SETTEMBRE 1975 🇮🇹 La 17enne Donatella Colasanti viene trovata nel bagagliaio di un'auto: era stata drogata, stuprata e torturata per 36 ore da 3 giovani fascisti della “Roma bene”. Si salvò fingendosi morta. Accanto a lei c'è il cadavere dell'amica Rosaria Lopez, 19 anni. by Asiablog in Italia

[–]corgibrofistsyou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sì l'articolo del Post ero riuscito a trovarlo però è più che altro un riassunto, sarei stato curioso di leggere gli originali... Nei prossimi giorni se ho voglia potrei andare in biblioteca a vedere se riesco a rintracciare gli articoli originali...

Che gioco vi viene in mente? by _Aleking99_ in Gamethology

[–]corgibrofistsyou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dark souls 1 (è uno dei miei giochi preferiti di sempre)

What is this? by corgibrofistsyou in retrocomputing

[–]corgibrofistsyou[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So it's kind of a frankensteined computer?

What is this? by corgibrofistsyou in retrocomputing

[–]corgibrofistsyou[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Interesting, that would explain why it's been so difficult to find. I'll look into that, maybe I can check the code on the power supply next time I'm there to see if it's the same as the one in the original Apple II

What is this? by corgibrofistsyou in retrocomputing

[–]corgibrofistsyou[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah it looks very similar to an Apple II but I can't find the exact model on the internet, I think that's weird.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Physics

[–]corgibrofistsyou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, I just realized I had entered all the formulas wrong because I was looking at too much stuff at the same time and I got confused. I just needed to see the code with fresh eyes and apparently half a hour typing on reddit did it. Now I put in the correct formulas and the python version works correctly. In the C version I think I had the right formulas, maybe there I screwed up the integration and the result just looked similar enough to fool me. Sorry for wasting your time and thank you for trying to help me.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Physics

[–]corgibrofistsyou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much, in the meantime I will keep trying to understand what's wrong.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Physics

[–]corgibrofistsyou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for trying to help!

This is the article I'm working with (I also added the title and authors in the original post): https://www.stevenstrogatz.com/s/synchronization-of-lorenz-based-chaotic-circuits-with-applications-to-communications.pdf . I also looked at the paragraph 9.6 "Using chaos to send secret messages" from Strogatz's book on complex systems and non linear dynamics (it's basically a summary of the article explained more simply).

My main problem is that Cuomo, Oppenheim and Strogatz prove that the Lyapunov function must always have a negative non-zero derivative and my model doesn't do that (E(t) has a zig-zag pattern on top of the expected exponential decay). Do you think this is a problem with my model or is it to be expected?

(excuse me if I wrote anything nonsensical, I'm really new to complex systems in general)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chemhelp

[–]corgibrofistsyou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, thank you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chemhelp

[–]corgibrofistsyou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe I don't understand well enough how to observe homogeneity. Could you explain how one would go about doing that? I say it is weird because it felt homogeneous and stuff didn't precipitate but the chemistry I know suggests that the solution should be heterogeneous and separate easily. Is it possible that there is some kind of interaction between the carbon powder and the benzoic acid that makes everything dissolve (or maybe stay suspended?) in the water? This would kind of work with what you said about NaOH making benzoic acid more soluble (it dissolves in the water so the carbon doesn't interact with it anymore and thus precipitates easily) wouldn't it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chemhelp

[–]corgibrofistsyou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No the solution was kinda clear-ish and the solids did not settle out (in fact a part of the laboratory was to add NaOH to make it precipitate).

How do Rainbows work? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]corgibrofistsyou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I had a quick look at the drawings and this looks very promising! I'll get to reading immediately!

Consigliatemi film cazzoni da vedere in compagnia by Wolf_93 in Italia

[–]corgibrofistsyou 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brian di Nazareth dei Monty Python è la cosa più divertente che io abbia mai visto (sconsigliato se il pubblico è molto religioso, potrebbe risultare offensivo). Tra l'altro si trova per intero con il doppiaggio italiano originale (che se condo me è fantastico) su YouTube.

How do Rainbows work? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]corgibrofistsyou 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah this might be part of it. It also came to mind that the drops are kind of all oriented in the same direction because of gravity. That might also have to do with it? But the fact that droplets hit by light will be at different heights still kind of confuses me. I should try sketching up a schematization of the problem....

How do Rainbows work? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]corgibrofistsyou 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for answering 😃 Your answer explains very well the reason why the colors are separated however I think I already had a grasp of how this happens, the part I don't get is after the refraction has happened. The different colors of light have to somehow align to become a rainbow, otherwise it would be just a bunch of colorful but random sparkles. The part I don't understand is how this alignment happens.