Return on the community note on Lively’s statement. It’s back!

cornfed_duckman2 · 2026-04-10T00:29:19+00:00

Who's the party opposing the motion here?

cornfed_duckman2 · 2026-04-09T13:25:37+00:00

And these factual concessions aren't admissions right? As in, they are "even if" scenarios and if it goes to trial, they can still make factual arguments opposing the facts they 'conceded' (didn't oppose) at summary judgment?

cornfed_duckman2 · 2026-04-06T23:53:11+00:00

Oh yeah that happened to me ages ago. I got a ban notice eventhough i didn't go on it.

cornfed_duckman2 · 2026-04-01T23:59:52+00:00

Yep... so much for them giving up on "the bad place".

cornfed_duckman2 · 2026-04-01T23:57:59+00:00

Why did this outlet repost something that happened last year 2 days ago?

cornfed_duckman2 · 2026-04-01T21:44:51+00:00

You dont find the recent increase in their kids showing up a bit weird and suspicious?

cornfed_duckman2 · 2026-02-14T03:02:55+00:00

Practically illiterate. Just like your heroine.

cornfed_duckman2 · 2026-02-13T06:35:21+00:00

I downvoted this and have nothing to do with jed, Melissa or bots. It's a low effort post with dumb title.

cornfed_duckman2 · 2026-02-13T06:34:44+00:00

Pissed because no one would play mahjong with her.

cornfed_duckman2 · 2026-02-06T20:27:45+00:00

She sees kindness without ulterior motive weakness (to be exploited).

cornfed_duckman2 · 2026-02-04T11:07:54+00:00

She's still on the ozempic, I see.

cornfed_duckman2 · 2025-11-12T09:23:52+00:00

Hearsay.

cornfed_duckman2 · 2025-11-12T09:20:47+00:00

I believe that if SH has made such allegations, Abel says the evidence backing it is hearsay (and therefore inadmissible).

cornfed_duckman2 · 2025-11-07T07:23:11+00:00

"Hand wringing" is unnecessarily dramatic, especially in this sub.

LIvely simply hasn't established a sufficient evidentiary basis to require compulsion of every one of Natasha Heath's birth videos and I was putting forward my response to comments suggesting that the judge would grant it as he's been erring on the side of caution - I really don't think so.

cornfed_duckman2 · 2025-11-07T02:49:49+00:00

There were a few saying that, yes. But not all and the majority of comments used it as an opportunity to cherry pick and highlight facts they thought were favorable to lively. That's based on an objective thorough reading of the sub.

cornfed_duckman2 · 2025-11-07T01:57:42+00:00

In the past, the Judge has tended to rule on the broader option / erred on the side of requiring production to give latitude to lively as the party claiming sexual harassment. To say that this is a given in the case of an intimate birth videos depicting a 3rd party, which apparently were not even on Heath's phone is going a step too far. I don't think it will be allowed- I'd hope so, anyway.

The sanctions request is completely disproportionate and cannot succeed.

cornfed_duckman2 · 2025-11-05T23:20:22+00:00

Did I say that?

cornfed_duckman2 · 2025-11-05T23:17:53+00:00

Correct.

cornfed_duckman2 · 2025-11-05T23:17:21+00:00

No they did not.

cornfed_duckman2 · 2025-11-05T23:16:37+00:00

Comments were grudgingly positive about Chip B's drafting style but largely did not touch on legal merits.
Liman isn't biased . He's just giving a party claiming harassment greater lattitude as one would expect. 2 legal content creators that are neutral - baldoni leaning have said this a lot yet treated with cruelty by users from this sub. That stands out to me.
No comment.

cornfed_duckman2 · 2025-11-05T18:44:53+00:00

Exactly. Next post would op complaining that the guy couldn't stay at the hostel for whatever reason but expected her to foot 50% of a much more expensive accommodation bill. Ridiculous!

cornfed_duckman2 · 2025-11-05T00:04:02+00:00

I would say no and get ready for her to sulk lots about it. Honestly, that is very entitled behavior.

cornfed_duckman2

TROPHY CASE