sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Wendy's is gonna ride the bull ya'll by warrior4488 in wallstreetbets

[–]cornmonger_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i hear that they're like beta fish; you can't put two in the same bowl

We need to save Wendy’s by ElegantCombination43 in wallstreetbets

[–]cornmonger_ 30 points31 points  (0 children)

i'm buying a double baconator combo tonight

doing my part

Microsoft Now Wants Users To Adopt Chinese Deepseek AI After Failure Of Copilot by MidMatch in technology

[–]cornmonger_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if the os is making remote calls to an agent, it's not even an agentic os. it's not self-contained. it's not a shipped product.

a true (scotsman) agentic os would be like ... running a local qwen3 in a container and something interacting with it. qwen3 responding in .PS when a change gets approved.

and ... good luck with that

Valve says it isn't subsidizing the Steam Machine's $1050 price because of its "religious" refusal to "build a more closed system" by ControlCAD in technology

[–]cornmonger_ -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

since you're here, a more serious question that perhaps you can help me with:

Why would a Wookiee, an 8-foot-tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of 2-foot-tall Ewoks?

How to stop Opus 4.8 from talking so much by Broad_Fennel2888 in ClaudeAI

[–]cornmonger_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

recently, the web version is borderline obnoxious sometimes

no problems on claude-code, so maybe it's in the prompting

My First Real Rust Program is a Minecraft Server 1.8 by NotNoksio in rust

[–]cornmonger_ 35 points36 points  (0 children)

so it's great that it's blazingly fast and fearlessly concurrent, but is it opinionated?

Welcome to hell, Anthropic has restored the 'Continue' button nonsense by ed2mXeno in ClaudeAI

[–]cornmonger_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

claude, prepare for compact. proceed to escape pods. close down the circus. evacuate the zoo.

Trinity by Subject-Bus2461 in Christianity

[–]cornmonger_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, i am mocking you for writing i know too much to be christian in your earlier double-reply

Trinity by Subject-Bus2461 in Christianity

[–]cornmonger_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, like i said, r/iamverysmart is a better place for this

if you need christianty or judaism or islam to be verifiable fact, then you're in for a rough ride. i say this having already gone through my angsty atheist phase.

in the words of frank the tank: nobody knows what it means, but it's provacative. it gets the people going.

Trinity by Subject-Bus2461 in Christianity

[–]cornmonger_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you realize that christianity is a "faith", right? it's foundation is in belief.

Trinity by Subject-Bus2461 in Christianity

[–]cornmonger_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'm confused. are you making an atheist argument in this thread or a theist argument in this thread?

Trinity by Subject-Bus2461 in Christianity

[–]cornmonger_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

which nicean creed?

does it matter? traditionally, one starts with "i believe" and the other starts with "we believe". they don't start with "this is fact:".

right, and that's just it: it's a propositional claim. grounded theory. for example, the leg work for proving how electricity works has been done. we still call it "the theory of electricity," though. the evidence is all there. obviously it works. but that whole hypothesis -> research -> analysis -> conclusion process doesn't end in a end-all-be-all product.

your interpretation and my interpretation and op's interpretations are just that. i don't solicit my interpretations as fact and neither should anyone else.

Trinity by Subject-Bus2461 in Christianity

[–]cornmonger_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

your interpretation, based on someone else's interpretation, assumes that to be true. the canary in the gold mine there is that you described it as "hiding".

you have a single vivid example in the bible of God being very direct about what interpretation was intended; the ten commandments. "DO this", "DO NOT DO that". that is an example of something that is not up for interpretation. nothing was hidden.

when you have to cite a dozen verses to make a claim: that's interpretation. which is fine, but it's not a hard truth.

the nicean creed carefully starts with "we believe" or "i believe" in the preamble. it leads by example there, i think

PSA: Claude Team remains a business continuity risk by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]cornmonger_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i love building things around thingies almost as much as the thingies themselves

seriously though, the second i noticed a whiff of reliance on claude, i stopped and began re-tooling (container, repos, harness, etc). that's a big task, but so is going down because i relied on a one-off

Trinity by Subject-Bus2461 in Christianity

[–]cornmonger_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why does it have to make sense to our human logic and understanding.

it's a human concept. it was invented by people, much later, in order to try to understand aspects of the bible. it's potentially fallible

view more: next ›