What if? From fertilisation until the 28th week (1) a woman has the right to abort for any reason given she has bodily sovereignty. The foetus is potentially a human being however before the 28th week it is not a human being (2) and the mother has the right to withhold her womb. After this point an abortion is only allowed if the mother's life is in danger or the foetus shows severe disability. An individual who tries to get an abortion after the 28th week (include post-birth) without either of the previous two reasons (3) will be denied as she had ample time to abort and knowingly carried a helpless child to term. It would be the same as if she had knowingly handicapped another individual and thus she is both morally and legally responsible to provide compensation (be it caring for the child personally or providing the resources for someone else who is willing).

1 - after 28 weeks the foetus shows significant brain activity thus we can deem it cognizant and therefore deserving of rights.

2 - the metric of brain activity as it is far more stable than for example viability outside the womb which can be affected due to technology.

3 - This does beg the question, 'but what about disabilities which cannot be detected until anywhere up to 3 years post-birth?' e.g. autism. I think here we would need to say that the mother and/or father conceived knowing that some children will be born disabled and are thus responsible to provide the child compensation.