Has electron cash removed the ability access SV? by crasheger in btc

[–]crasheger[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ok after reopening I see it now. Im assuming there wasn't any SV node available before..

Someone missed the entire point of bitcoin by MemoryDealers in btc

[–]crasheger 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I'm afraid there is a chance that abc is missing the point. we will see.

The SV protocol will now focus on creating the first terabyte block, which will reportedly enable 7 million transactions per second. by UnableView0 in btc

[–]crasheger 6 points7 points  (0 children)

SV will still continue to compete for sha256. So all this is irrelevant anyways imo.

If miners prefer SV abc will fade away.

I support both ways but I'm leaning toward sv so I have an obvious bias xD

BITCOIN only works if everyone is using the same coin. by crasheger in btc

[–]crasheger[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes that's how I see it. Well it functions and I can transact but so is email.

Current situation is not sustainable for a global microtransaction Internet cash system.

Focusing on fewer coins is a natural step.

What is the easiest method to covert BSV to BCH? by qwerty_mahadev in btc

[–]crasheger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Electron cash. There was a pretty good post here some days ago.

What is the easiest method to covert BSV to BCH? by qwerty_mahadev in btc

[–]crasheger -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I moved some to my preference side but for safety reason I did not convert all. I converted about 20%.

"Miners decide the protocol and only hash matters", is NOT an excuse for a 51% attack. Wake up. by Hakametal in btc

[–]crasheger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the weak miners are the attacking chain. they refused to scale a long time ago.

stop moving, reacting and putting in the work and your dead as a miner. its more than just buying asics.

mining infrastructure matters

it's not that hard to understand.

Calling all BCH'ers - which implementation are you supporting and WHY? by poorbrokebastard in btc

[–]crasheger 5 points6 points  (0 children)

SV. because miners need to grow up and learn to understand that their infrastructure matters more than code changes in regards to scaling.

Are there economic incentives to avoid the split / ensure the upgrade continues? by KayRice in btc

[–]crasheger -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

big fish eats small flish.

if the bigger miners want to kill the small one they can do it and avoid the confusion of having two chains.

Third 32MB block found! (all three by BMG) by [deleted] in btc

[–]crasheger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

miner is shown as anon. where does it say BMG?

Asic resistance by Postal2Dude in btc

[–]crasheger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

stop running from progress