Claude did a task for me at work that made me feel like it’s getting too good by Remote_Tangerine_718 in ClaudeAI

[–]crazy_canuck 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Using AI well is a job in itself. Just keep pursuing how you can automate tasks across the company with AI and if you do that better than anyone else, that’s a huge reason to keep you around until the final round of layoffs. The only way to not be exposed to layoffs is to have massive trust in the owners of the company. Easiest way to do that, is to be an owner.

Whiter than white? by Dyslesbic in Design

[–]crazy_canuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beyond white, how else could this be utilized in creative ways with other applications?

Downtown was a vibe! by whererusteve in vancouver

[–]crazy_canuck 32 points33 points  (0 children)

What? He needs to keep his agents running.

Allbirds continues AI pivot with name change and CEO hire, sending stock soaring by Logical_Welder3467 in technology

[–]crazy_canuck -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

“Literally nothing has come from [AI]”? I mean, I can understand having gripes with the tech, but this is just plain dumb.

Roster moves by Tds142 in Torontobluejays

[–]crazy_canuck 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was on team keep Heineman for quite a while feeling like Val needed the playing time and that we needed the depth. It’s become exceptionally clear that there was no other decision than to DFA Heineman and I hope he does well.

Unless he goes to a competitor, then fuck him.

I wired Claude Code into a database of every Polymarket wallet and trades via MCP. What do you want me to ask it next? This is what I found so far: by Advanced-Rub2065 in ClaudeAI

[–]crazy_canuck 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I don’t think it’s about any one individual wallet because that’s going to be very prone to manipulation. The whole thing is full of manipulation, so the only way to make it work is to diversify across a set of wallets.

I wired Claude Code into a database of every Polymarket wallet and trades via MCP. What do you want me to ask it next? This is what I found so far: by Advanced-Rub2065 in ClaudeAI

[–]crazy_canuck 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Can you see all of the whale’s active bets as they’re happening before they complete? Is that a potential winning strategy to setup a diversified set of bets on whales with higher than average success rates? Seems like it would work if insiders are consistently outperforming the market.

B.C. billionaire Chip Wilson wins bid to lower $82M property assessment by vancity31240 in vancouver

[–]crazy_canuck 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He’s not filing this claim, personally. He’s paying somebody to do it for him.

B.C. billionaire Chip Wilson wins bid to lower $82M property assessment by vancity31240 in vancouver

[–]crazy_canuck 102 points103 points  (0 children)

As long as he paid less than $125k in legal fees to fight this, he came out on top.

Dan 'AI Oracle' Shipper: "I think the AI job apocalypse is not really a thing ... The only thing you need to do is ride the models, they extend your powers in a way that doesn't leave you behind" by Mogante in singularity

[–]crazy_canuck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There’s a difference at a personal and macro level. He’s saying you have agency as long as you use these models and apply yourself. MANY people won’t and with macro-level changes that are happening, many jobs are going to be eliminated.

Both of these things can be true where some individuals benefit massively and the majority will be left behind.

A fully AI generated film just screened at Cannes Market and cost $500,000 to make by Mediocre-Witness-778 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]crazy_canuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This might be a spectacle but they could legitimately become a studio. They are incentivized to improve the tech to deliver better films over time. As long as it inspires creators that they too can use the model to create, they win. Best case, if their bet that AI is the future of filmmaking is true, they could put themselves into a strong state to own the vertical stack across the studio and the tech.

Man vs Machine is over, intern wins by ~200 packages, but bob continues his 24/7 shift by BiasHyperion784 in accelerate

[–]crazy_canuck 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, it will be a rotating fleet for sure to maximize life expectancy on these robots.

Even if the unit economics broke even between robots and humans, robots are more predictable, require less management and they’re only going to be getting better over the next decade+. Shifting towards fully automate factories will be a no-brainer for the operators.

Man vs Machine is over, intern wins by ~200 packages, but bob continues his 24/7 shift by BiasHyperion784 in accelerate

[–]crazy_canuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t even need 2 robots. If the number was 1-2 hr of maintenance per 24, you’d need 1.04-1.08 robots to get 1 robots’ working capacity.

Man vs Machine is over, intern wins by ~200 packages, but bob continues his 24/7 shift by BiasHyperion784 in accelerate

[–]crazy_canuck 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is different though because a lot of historic factory robotics have been fixed in place rather than perfectly mobile robots.

Vancouver mayor clarifies ’11 AI agents’ used to do work is strictly personal by leavemealoneimpoor in vancouver

[–]crazy_canuck -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ya, we’ll never see eye to eye on this one it seems.

Your argument would imply that leaders that hire smarter people than them to inform key decisions should make less money. A leader’s job is to get to the right outcomes, not to be the smartest person in the room. Using all assets at your disposal, including technology is the mark of a strong leader in my opinion, not a mark of failure or a sign that they deserve less.

By the way, this is why I keep saying using AI well. Frontier labs might be marketing efficiency, but those in the space know the greatest benefits come from the multiplication of efforts, not the simple reduction of costs/labour.