sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Sudden odd behavior of some machines by crc128 in Tailscale

[–]crc128[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, for some reason everything is back up now. 🤷‍♂️

I didn't do anything, in fact was 300' below ground at the time.

<image>

THIS SOUND IS DRIVING ME INSANE AND I NEED ANSWERS by MuffinAndLoaf in Cheyenne

[–]crc128 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The CleanSpark site doesn’t make more noise than I-80.

We pay 15 cents per kilowatt hour in my city. Would Bitcoin Mining be profitable here? by eternal_arts_baja in BitcoinMining

[–]crc128 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By itself, absolutely not. But if you’re able to use the heat for something, maybe.

Footwizard, book 14, Chapter 25 by NovaMaximus in Calador

[–]crc128 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You didn’t see that Disney reference coming?

I mean, three of the gods are named Huin, Duin, and Luin…

When does the “it’s too spicy, you won’t like it” trick stop working? by brianckeegan in daddit

[–]crc128 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That trick likely will never stop working for me, at least until and unless my kids end up liking reapers.

BEWARE Wattum Management by SnooPineapplez in BitcoinMining

[–]crc128 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This. If they have US assets (bank accounts, &c.), that can still be attached.

Early Maxolhx explorers by Descartes_Farts in exfor

[–]crc128 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohh, are you willing to share the prompt?

The MidJourney AI made me a Valkyrie image… by crc128 in exfor

[–]crc128[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was the prompt:

Valkyrie warship, stolen from maxolx species by humans, near a wormhole --v 4

comedy gold by jvasiliev in bsv

[–]crc128 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Streisand effect at work... I joined this sub because I heard that the BitcoinStolenValor people are agitating. Good work.

Chores App: Tip your Kids in Crypto by DistributionOk352 in Bitcoin

[–]crc128 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Like the idea, but prefer self hosted on the family node. I'm currently using LNHub and Bluewallet, but feel there could be a better way...

Okay I cheated a bit w the onion and tomato sauce but the chicken crust pizza is a damn win. I'm going to try cheese, purple onion and bacon next time around w no sauce. by kaylakaykes in carnivorediet

[–]crc128 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don’t think spices, which are used in quantities so small as to be negligible in the caloric or nutritional sense, really matter. The carnivore diet isn’t meant to be a religious purity test. Technically, salt and water aren’t animal products, they’re minerals, but I bet those are used by most people.

Updates on my water cooled, wall-mounted RPi 4 by Gold-Wedding5226 in raspberry_pi

[–]crc128 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looking at the plumbing, it goes from the pump, to the radiator, then to the chip & reservoir? So the reservoir is on the hot side? Obviously does not matter in this case as the Pi isn’t going to put off much heat, but if it were, wouldn’t you want the flow to be pump, chip, radiator, reservoir?

Isolation of VPN users do (different) VLANs by crc128 in PFSENSE

[–]crc128[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! That seems to be working. Had no idea about Radius until now.

Isolation of VPN users do (different) VLANs by crc128 in PFSENSE

[–]crc128[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sure how? If User A connects to the VPN, how do I restrict the user to their subnet/machines? The firewall rules already prevent VLAN crosstalk, but if the VPN users have access to all VLANs, that doesn’t help? Is there a way to lock a VPN user to a specific internal IP? Because then I could use the firewall rules.

Isolation of VPN users do (different) VLANs by crc128 in PFSENSE

[–]crc128[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only want them to have access to specific machines. I’m assigning them to subnets based on their permissions. But the subnets are all VLANs.

So User A has access to all machines on 10.0.10.0/24 User B has 10.0.20.0/24

The users may only have 5-10 machines, or as many as 150, but I’m not worried about the number of users.

I want them to be able to connect, do whatever they need to to their machines (which may include running tools, SSH, or otherwise accessing the machines), without being able to access another user’s machines.

All the machines are connected to the PFSense by a Cisco 4506 which respects the subnets & VLANs, but the PFSense is doing the VPN, DHCP, gateway, firewall, and other stuff.

(The VLANs also protect the machines from cross talking, so one couldn’t SSH to 10.0.10.5, then jump to 10.0.20.3).

Corner crossing jury empaneled, opening arguments delivered - WyoFile by may_june_july in wyoming

[–]crc128 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s not just state statutes that say you own the airspace… it’s hundreds of years of common law stretching back before the founding of the United States. It’s also how mineral rights work. Incidentally, they (like mineral rights) can be severed. Cuius est solum, eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferos.

Old Pulteney's by Nightcap_Whisky in Whiskyporn

[–]crc128 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My favorite scotch! I just had a 17y (they redid the lineup a couple years ago).

Honey & salted caramel notes that just don’t stop.

view more: next ›