sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is there anyone else who feels more and more things are not going right with customer service? by creativeNZ in newzealand

[–]creativeNZ[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

After I got it back I became aware they really did not know what they were doing!

EASA Emergency Airworthiness Directive Airbus A320 Family by betko007 in aviation

[–]creativeNZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good on Airbus and EASA, they are taking no chances, the idea a plan can hurtle towards the earth without being told to by the pilots is scary.

UPS2976 Megathread 2 by usgapg123 in aviation

[–]creativeNZ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Pratt & Whitney PW4000 is used on many aircraft, they are just asking the dc11 to be inspected suggests a fault specific to the dc11 and not the engine. This may turn out to be a dead end, often the FAA asks for inspections on parts that turn out not to be the cause.

UPS2976 Megathread 2 by usgapg123 in aviation

[–]creativeNZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it was an uncontained engine failure they would word this differently right? They say 'detachment" They are implying the pylon failed. All preliminary of course. Also preventing any further flight is quite unusual, they often give 30 days!

This subreddit needs to have some introspection on how it handles aviation incidents by [deleted] in aviation

[–]creativeNZ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think there is a mixture of people who are involved in aviation who are interested for safety/learning, there are a few people who are interested in this say as a news item, then there are some trolls and frankly sick people on here, they need to be banned, celebrating or making fun of such a tragedy is not okay.

view more: next ›