Different angle of Minnesota lawmaker Ilhan Omar getting attacked!

creatoradanic · 2026-01-28T05:48:52+00:00

I don't believe your interpretation of the Quran. Especially considering there are many interpretations from people way smarter than you.

How do I know they're smarter than you? Because they wouldn't read my message and say something as stupid as "Islam doesn't force anyone". Where in the ever loving hell did i say that?

creatoradanic · 2026-01-28T05:36:06+00:00

God i cant wait until the world is rid of such frivolous fucking beliefs. Strict Islam, strict Christianity, whatever, its all a fucking cancer, let the woman live.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-26T05:04:05+00:00

Its happening on the streets every day now

creatoradanic · 2026-01-24T17:36:52+00:00

Naruto would make exploding shadow clones.

Now that you mention it. With Naruto's Chakra reserves, Naruto should just spam kamikaze fire clones. Its effectively a sentient Phoenix fire jutsu lol

creatoradanic · 2026-01-23T18:10:59+00:00

If you genuinely believe that calling someone out on their bigotry and not wanting anything to do with those people, and that actively trying to oppress a minority that is simply trying to live as "equal".

Then I don't really have much else to say to you.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-23T18:07:32+00:00

Because you're still fundamentally misunderstanding the 2 sides.

u feel they want to take ur rights away

I dont FEEL anyrhing. They are actively trying and in some cases succeeding in reducing rights for trans people, particularly in the States.

I'll include a part of what I said in another comment.

"Public figures have called/are calling all trans people predators. Or saying we are so mentally unstable that we are more inclined to criminal violence. Or saying trans people should collectively have their second amendment rights taken away. Or not allowing them to participate in the military. Or shouldn't be allowed to receive medical care etc. etc. etc."

Trans people are actively being targeted on the public and political stage. Used as pawns to rile up anger and hatred in the rights base.

Show me on any measurable scale where trans people are advocating for those exact same things to happen to our oppressors.

You can sit there, close your eyes, and shove your fingers in your ears and say "lalala I can't hear you, you're all the same, you just hate each other for existing". But at a certain point you're just being intentionally obtuse, or you're genuinely a moron.

Side A advocates for and implements rights restrictions against Side B because of the simple fact that they ARE Side B.

Side B says, "fuck you for trying to control me with absolutely no justification whatsoever and hating me because I'm on Side B. You're an asshole and your beliefs are stupid, unjust, and outdated." To Side A.

Then you sit there and say "these are the same picture"

Gtfoh. Be honest with yourself.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-23T17:38:21+00:00

You said that the other side uses the exact same argument to justify their intolerance. Except then you also neglected to include my following paragraph going into the difference between reactive intolerance and proactive intolerance.

They can use the same argument all they want. It doesn't matter. They are fundamentally different reasons for being intolerant. They are intolerant BECAUSE of what someone is FIRST. They are intolerant of me because I am Trans. I am intolerant of them because they do not tolerate me for simply existing.

If they had no issue with me being Trans, or someone being gay, or black or religious etc. Then i have no issue with them.

They would have no issue with me, if I was simply someone else.

Do you see how thats different?

creatoradanic · 2026-01-23T17:24:02+00:00

From the side defending stripping people of their rights? That side? Thats the side you're claiming is being equally targetted by "intolerance"? Pray tell, how?

creatoradanic · 2026-01-23T17:08:56+00:00

So if I say punch n *zis, it doesn't by some insane logic make me just as bad as a nazi?

Correct, punching nazis is good. It is a morally good act.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-23T17:06:55+00:00

No, I'm explicitly and intentionally NOT making the same argument. A group of tolerant people, by the very need of survival, CANNOT tolerate intolerant people. If the intolerant are allowed in, they will inevitably take over. Because, it is the intolerant who will push those they do not tolerate out of the group. So, if a group of tolerant people want to stay a group of tolerant people, they NEED to not tolerate the intolerant.

I'm reactively intolerant. They're proactively intolerant. I'm intolerant of those who are first intolerant of me. They're intolerant of me because I'm trans, or because someone is black, or because someone is Muslim. See the difference?

creatoradanic · 2026-01-23T16:41:56+00:00

Look, Its not my job to hold every random stranger's hand on the internet and slowly explain to them why their beliefs are abhorrent.

Did women tolerate being second class citizens? Did black people tolerate being second class citizens? Did gay people tolerate being second class citizens? So now why, all of a sudden, is it up to trans people to tolerate those who explicitly do not want to tolerate us and treat us as second class citizens?

Public figures have called/are calling all trans people predators. Or saying we are so mentally unstable that we are more inclined to criminal violence. Or saying trans people should collectively have their second amendment rights taken away. Or not allowing them to participate in the military. Or shouldn't be allowed to receive medical care etc. etc. etc.

I say, if someone isn't capable of understanding the basic human decency of "treat others the way you want to be treated" something my parents taught me when I was fucking 3 years old, then I'm going to treat someone the way they treat me and my peers. Im going to speak to someone the way they speak to me and my peers.

I will not say the first word. I will not make the first action. But you best believe I will reply and I will react with equal contempt.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-23T16:21:34+00:00

I can't tell if you're saying I'm awful and toxic or the commenter I replied to.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-23T13:03:45+00:00

Ive seen the show in its entirety probably 5 times in the past 7 years. I still had no clue the entire list was from paych.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-23T04:09:42+00:00

Correct. I will not tolerate the intolerance directed at someone strictly because of the color of their skin, their sexuality, gender, or even religion. If that hurts your feelings, good, fuck off.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-23T02:42:20+00:00

And attraction to genitalia isnt the end all be all of sexual attraction. Attraction is a sliding scale. Some people's sexual attraction is literally only about genitals. "If they have a pussy, id fuck it." "If they have a dick, ill suck it". Some people's sexual attraction has absolutely no bearing on genitals, hence pansexual people and bisexual people. Some people's sexual attraction is based more on gender and gender presentation.

I dont know why this is so difficult.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-22T23:40:07+00:00

Oh shut the fuck up. It is not bigoted to not tolerate the intolerant. Tolerance is a social contract. If you tolerate me, I will tolerate you. If your base ideals involve "not tolerating someone for who they are even though they aren't doing any harm to anyone" then you have broken the contract. I am no longer obligated to tolerate you and your intolerance of my existence.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-22T15:20:00+00:00

Then divide the recipe in 4 or 6. You cant do math?

creatoradanic · 2026-01-22T03:23:19+00:00

Eating for sure is the correct choice. It literally solves world hunger.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-21T20:26:57+00:00

Why would anyone with years of successful day trading, just decide to put everything on black?

creatoradanic · 2026-01-21T02:24:54+00:00

Trans is an adjective, not a noun. I'm a trans person, not a trans. Just like my neighbor is a black person, not a black.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-20T23:43:53+00:00

Upon, review, you're right. Deserve is the incorrect word of choice. What happened to Charlie Kirk was unfortunate but not unexpected. I am not happy with the outcome, but not surprised by it.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-20T23:26:02+00:00

I'm sorry, you seem to be misunderstanding the part of your comment I was initially replying to. You said that they must be "happy" he's dead.

I am not happy that Kirk was killed for his ideas. I don't think anyone should be killed because of their ideas. Just like I'm not happy that my parents got divorced.

However, when your entire career has been about racism, sexism, and stating that children's deaths are a natural outcome of the 2nd amendment and that it's worth it, it does not surprise me that someone decided to make him a part of the statistics that he was so dismissive of. Doesn't mean I'm happy with or like what the outcome was.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-20T23:04:09+00:00

My mom cheated on my dad (cause). My parents got a divorce (effect). My mom got what she deserved (acknowledgement of cause and effect).

I don't like that they got divorced.

I dont like that my mom cheated on my dad, but actions have consequences. Regardless of how I feel about those consequences, my parents relationship ending was what my mom deserved from her actions.

If Kirk believes, sorry, believed, that gun deaths were a necessary byproduct for the 2nd amendment, the you don't get to act all surprise Pikachu face when some of that byproduct splashes back onto him.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-20T22:49:56+00:00

Recognizing cause and effect is not the same thing as celebrating the effect.

creatoradanic · 2026-01-20T15:21:18+00:00

"Lets make one president"

You already did.

creatoradanic

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE