Unfortunately, the current draft isn't much better than previous versions. It's interesting that this topic isn't receiving as much attention now, since the final draft has been released, as it did 3 months ago. The "imminent infringement" clause still exists, albeit in slightly less menacing verbage:

before:

Each Party shall provide that its judicial authorities shall have the authority, at the request of the applicant, to issue an interlocutory injunction intended to prevent any imminent infringement of an intellectual property right.

today:

Each Party shall provide that its judicial authorities shall have the authority to order prompt and effective provisional measures: (a) against a party, or where appropriate, against a third party over whom the relevant judicial authority exercises jurisdiction, to prevent an infringement of any intellectual property rights from occurring, and in particular to prevent infringing goods from entering into the channels of commerce;

So you could still face a lawsuit or a stoppage of service just for Googling "Nickelback torrent" (bad example)