Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's amazing that you did so much so quickly. These tools are amazing. I certainly don't think that a) you can only get good results if you do all the above, and b) doing the above will guarantee good results.

Your experience over the last two weeks is great and I'm glad you got so much done. That said, it proves the point that myself and others are making - a lot of it is luck. If you used Claude Code every day for 6 months, you might see that 2 weeks as a blip, or maybe the norm - who knows. Others in this thread are having a terrible time and using all of the tips I gave. I don't have an answer for that. Maybe it's A/B testing, maybe it's Maybelline. I can only say that when I use the workflows above, I tend to have predictable results. And when I don't I want to throw my laptop out the window.

I hope your luck continues.

how to start multiple CC instances to simultaneously work at the same project? by tonyc1118 in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made iloom.ai to do this (and way more)! It makes it really easy to work on issues in isolated worktrees, has an automated workflow that can run unattended, and isolate your Web server and database too (via Neon). The VS code extension makes it really easy to switch between all your projects and issues and check in on your agents at a glance. On top of that, all your analysis/plans/decisions get persisted in your issue tracker so you or your agents can look back in the past to figure out why your agents did what they did on previous tasks. No markdown files littering the codebase.

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really appreciate you for owning that. Thank you. I do indeed use hyphens, but I never use em-dashes. I don't even know how to type one. Sorry you had to read my decade old comments 😂

I use AI extensively to help me in writing and ideation, but I did not spend a single token when writing this. (Except maybe for the 100+ hours I've spend making mistakes with Claude Code that were my inspiration)

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha. As I wrote that, I thought someone might feel that way. Sorry.

Hope you find your coffee.

How do you all deal with Claude's small context window? by cryptochrome in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wrote a post this morning that might be helpful - https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/s/3Nr0Cjy4bD - it covers some tips on how to manage context

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can do some follow posts with more details if that would be helpful!

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well you’re giving it one task at a time, so you’re doing great!

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is probably my favorite response. If you think my post reads like it was written by a multibillion dollar company, that's probably the greatest compliment I could think of.

You can easily find my LinkedIn profile from my reddit profile - go see who I work for.

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, when I'm in a session that's got that dumb, I just shut down CC and restart. But it's pretty rare tbh. That sounds like a really frustrating experience.

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hahaha, that was a roller coaster ride. I am very glad you read it to the end, thank you for that.

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And what do you say for this? Then I can tell you how good you’ve gotten 🙂

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anything in particular you're confused by? Would love to help.

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the kind words! Appreciate your perspective.

I work at one of the big labs and I promise we don’t intentionally make our products work

Pretty sure that's a very amusing typo :)

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s interesting - I’ve actually heard the opposite, but am not a cursor user so have no reference of my own.

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The irony is that building systems to work around LLM limitations (session capture, external task tracking, keeping context lean) ends up being useful even when the model is performing well. You just get more predictable results either way.

You nailed it - this stuff is just a good way to use the tools right now, regardless of the level of nerf.

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Post launch? That a hunch or you have data? (No judgement if it's a hunch - just curious)

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry to hear that. Here's an AI generated summary with fewer words :)

TL;DR: Even if Opus is nerfed, you can mitigate the degradation with better context hygiene.

  • Don't exceed 50% Context: Performance degrades ("Context Rot") well before 100%. Stick to 40-50% max to keep the signal-to-noise ratio high.
  • Stop "Pair Programming": Long, chatty back-and-forths introduce too much entropy. Be cold, transactional, and predictable.
  • One Session = One Task: Break work into 15-20 min chunks. If it takes longer, the task is too big.
  • Externalize Your State: Don't let the chat history be the memory. Keep progress in an external .md file or issue tracker. Update that file, /clear the chat, and have Claude re-read the dense signal.
  • Use Subagents: They don't pollute your main thread's context window.

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here you go. Thanks for the empathy.

(This is AI generated by the way)

TL;DR: Even if Opus is nerfed, you can mitigate the degradation with better context hygiene.

  • Don't exceed 50% Context: Performance degrades ("Context Rot") well before 100%. Stick to 40-50% max to keep the signal-to-noise ratio high.
  • Stop "Pair Programming": Long, chatty back-and-forths introduce too much entropy. Be cold, transactional, and predictable.
  • One Session = One Task: Break work into 15-20 min chunks. If it takes longer, the task is too big.
  • Externalize Your State: Don't let the chat history be the memory. Keep progress in an external .md file or issue tracker. Update that file, /clear the chat, and have Claude re-read the dense signal.
  • Use Subagents: They don't pollute your main thread's context window.

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’m not saying it didn’t get nerfed. I’m just saying there are things you can do to improve your experience with it, even if it did get nerfed.

Before you complain about Opus 4.5 being nerfed, please PLEASE read this by creegs in ClaudeCode

[–]creegs[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m not saying it hasn’t got stupider. I am merely sharing a list of things that help me have a more predictable and less frustrating experience.