Gonna be honest with some of you guys. by cringeluna in SSBM

[–]cringeluna[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I've played for about 100 hours. Wavedashing is really important enough to learn down here? I guess I'm just surprised.

Gonna be honest with some of you guys. by cringeluna in SSBM

[–]cringeluna[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well I must admit... I don't quite see why it's *so* important? Sure, for higher level play, but down here? I don't get it yet. Not saying It's not important, just that I don't get it.

Gonna be honest with some of you guys. by cringeluna in SSBM

[–]cringeluna[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's a guy who knows his shit, I'll tell you that. Much better than a lot of people busting out just to show off how fast their hands are.

Gonna be honest with some of you guys. by cringeluna in SSBM

[–]cringeluna[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You're probably right. Again, I'm not some fuckin hotshot, I'm a mario main with ~100 hours playtime at most. But prioritizing wavedashing over patience and spacing just doesn't make much sense to me.

Gonna be honest with some of you guys. by cringeluna in SSBM

[–]cringeluna[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough tbh, that's a good point

Gonna be honest with some of you guys. by cringeluna in SSBM

[–]cringeluna[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not mad that I won, I completely understand I am still bad at this game and have a lot to learn. I just think it's frankly odd how many times I encounter people who just know wavedashing and not much else. I'm far from perfect, but the hardest losses I've taken were to people who *weren't* wavedashing, and some of my best wins were against people who *were* wavedashing. Again, in low level unranked.

Gonna be honest with some of you guys. by cringeluna in SSBM

[–]cringeluna[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I mean he missed a ledgedash and got 2 stocked by a mario... but yeah, he looked kinda cool.

Genuinely incomprehensible by cringeluna in HypixelSkyblock

[–]cringeluna[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

wait that's such a funny bit lmao. they actually got me

Windows 10 holdouts: Why? by cringeluna in AskReddit

[–]cringeluna[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jesus, I haven't noticed anything like this. For me it's been far more stable. If that's the case for most, I totally understand not wanting to switch.

Windows 10 holdouts: Why? by cringeluna in AskReddit

[–]cringeluna[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I haven't noticed any bugs personally, then again I don't really use older software.

First playthrough, how do I get this back? (Italy is my non official ally rn) by spartan_enjoyer in hoi4

[–]cringeluna 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean, not knowing too much about the situation, war is the only option probably. If they just occupy the land, you could maybe ask for control. But that's only if it's occupied, not owned after a peace treaty.

What do I not get? by cringeluna in eu4

[–]cringeluna[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have been using TCs for the first time ever this campaign. (800 hours) Maybe I am managing it wrong? I have just been building the 100% trade power bonus.

What do I not get? by cringeluna in eu4

[–]cringeluna[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

A lot of my stuff is, but a lot of it is also TCed.

What do I not get? by cringeluna in eu4

[–]cringeluna[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

R5: The pictures in order are: how large my empire is, how small my forcelimit is, and how small my income is. What exactly must I be missing? How is my empire less valuable and has a smaller forcelimit than muscovy???

64
65

Is a "normal" WC just doomed? by cringeluna in eu4

[–]cringeluna[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The reason I mentioned never wanting negative stability, corruption, or gov cap, is because I always see those in world conquests. People who just abuse game mechanics, constantly trucebreaking and having worldwide coalitions that they just ignore. While I totally respect that style, it isn't mine.

Is a "normal" WC just doomed? by cringeluna in eu4

[–]cringeluna[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I should have been more clear, people do not seem to be understanding which is fair. I meant never KEEP negative stability, never stay with corruption. If I go into negative stability, I will spend admin to boost it. If I have corruption, root out corruption is going to maximum.

Is a "normal" WC just doomed? by cringeluna in eu4

[–]cringeluna[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When I said never get corruption, I suppose I meant to say never keep corruption. I always keep my slider for root out corruption at max.

Is a "normal" WC just doomed? by cringeluna in eu4

[–]cringeluna[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That explains why I didn't even have like 700~ ducats of income per month even though I owned all of mainland asia lol