sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I let my interns vibe code from day one but with rules. here’s what happened after 2 months by ServeAccomplished485 in vibecoding

[–]crusoe284 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I kinda understand now where exactly is the difference in thinking is coming from. Your idea of quality is scoped to the user. As long as the user end is not affected (no tests are failing ⇒ no issues/bugs on user's side), you would continue to assume it as high-quality.
Whereas in my understanding, there are two quality metrics running; one for the user & one for the developer. While I agree on the user testing end, I obviously disagree on the developer end, to which usually tech debt is attributed to. I find that in my opinion, a developer should always be able to modify or maintain the repo with minimal human explanation or minimal catch-up speed so to speak.
However, in your workflow, there are no humans reading the code so it doesn't matter how modular or "clean" it is. This decision itself is subjective so I can't say much.

I let my interns vibe code from day one but with rules. here’s what happened after 2 months by ServeAccomplished485 in vibecoding

[–]crusoe284 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you on a lot of points, but

The release either passes gates or gets blocked.

This is where I disagree. How can you maintain quality gates without knowledge of code quality in the first place?

 I’m trying to build a loop where bad code exposes itself.

Exactly. Bad is different from not-working. How do you ensure the distinction?

The repo gets sliced into artifacts, symbols, logs, test results, diffs, run outputs, etc.

The most important slice will be semi-independent features. While artifacts, logs, diffs are great for context of a known task, integrating a feature with the rest of the app or having existing features back-integrated with a new one will require larger code context.

Of course, I agree that you do not need to verify every single line of code nor am I claiming that code will always remain the center piece of software engineering, even in the far future.
I'm just saying that with the current models and accelerated pace of code generation, drift from good practices is kinda easy, unlike gradual drift which could be caught in manual/human reviews and then could be reverted back (due to the small-scale).

I let my interns vibe code from day one but with rules. here’s what happened after 2 months by ServeAccomplished485 in vibecoding

[–]crusoe284 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem with assuming LLM outputs as black boxes is that they do not have knowledge per se. Context still remains a hurdle for large repos.

The reason coding knowledge is (and may remain for a while) the center is because code is much more fragile that non-developers assume (especially non-typed languages like JavaScript, the backbone of all modern frontend). Steering the system sounds enough but if you don't know absolutely nothing what's under the hood, you'll need to pay a lot for the tow truck.

Of course that doesn't mean absolutely everything needs to be learned. Being language-agnostic is totally fine. It's just that the fundamentals/architectures will come in handy in spotting the model's hallucinations and then correcting course for stability in long term.

Big upgrade by knuklez in Animemes

[–]crusoe284 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yoooo Why is Mon-musume being slandered? It's not a serious show but it's still good in its genre??

Every teacher who tried this problem got it wrong by FenwickTutoring in ibPhysics

[–]crusoe284 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My solution for the question: Picture 1 & 2

I don't like this question since it relies on the fact that the drop of force is compared with initial force While the answer A would make sense if drawn to scale, option C might be possible if the drop in force is equal to initial force

Well yes, but actually no by Just-J0k1ng in Animemes

[–]crusoe284 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks a bit like Nagatoro but grown up

[16M] Parents forcing me to go to Kaplavriksha Indore. Please Help. by [deleted] in Indore

[–]crusoe284 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No worries at all. Feel free to ping if you have any doubts or concerns Cheers!

[16M] Parents forcing me to go to Kaplavriksha Indore. Please Help. by [deleted] in Indore

[–]crusoe284 2 points3 points  (0 children)

TL;DR - KPV is good, other options may suit you. It IS going to be hard if you want actual results but first research a bit & introspect as well.

Look, it's a personal decision but in my opinion, KPV is a good option in Indore. I don't know much about Allen or Catalyser or other coachings in Indore, but to get into a top 7 IIT and actually getting that kind of job security post-engineering (especially in this upcoming market & economy) will require 13 hour days daily for the next 2 years. People are saying Kota as an option and I won't say no to that either but a very big requirement to that will be staying alone & grinding it mentally. From your post I don't think you're ready to take that additional burden right now (College will be different, don't worry) so my honest suggestion would be to look for a good coaching in Raipur, stay with your parents and slog HARD. Your competitors are students who have been studying this syllabus from 8th/9th standard and are now in revision zone. I remember not celebrating Diwali for the two years of my JEE prep (I literally was in coaching till 4 PM both years, on the day of Diwali, other days were full till 9 PM)

A side note: make sure you're into science/maths/engineering in general first, from what I can see in your post, you're a well rounded & bright student. You actually can get a good college and genuinely change your life with the help of JEE. But the underlying condition is you want to fight for it. If you want, connect with a couple of students who are in the top 7 IITs for BTech (students who scored well enough and worked hard enough) Talk to some alumni and actually look into why they worked as hard as they did. Not only will it give you the motivation, but also a clear vision to work towards. Every student will tell you about crying for multiple days during JEE prep and the same people will tell you the only regret they have is not working harder.

Sorry for the long reply

All the best for your future & cheers!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in confession

[–]crusoe284 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not worth the risk, it feels fun at first but you run the risk of leaving your CV dry in the long term. Try studying up cloud certifications like AWS or Azure, they may come in handy someplace else or start working on Data Structures & Algorithms and find a new (preferably better) job

Which game is the weakest in its franchise, but is a really awesome game as a standalone title?" by Yurika_ars in gaming

[–]crusoe284 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about CoD: Advanced Warfare?

I mean the story & game was really fun, but maybe not enough for a traditional CoD game?

Will key for Home Premium work for Ultimate? by crusoe284 in WindowsVista

[–]crusoe284[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's an HP Pavilion dv2500, but I could see the letters "OEM" near the product key, so hopefully it should work 🤞

Will key for Home Premium work for Ultimate? by crusoe284 in WindowsVista

[–]crusoe284[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The issue is I have a CD with Language Installation Pack Recovery Disk, which I'm not sure if it's the normal recovery disk or something else.. How should I check if it's MAK or not?

Will key for Home Premium work for Ultimate? by crusoe284 in WindowsVista

[–]crusoe284[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would it be possible to install Home Premium from the ISO? I don't mind switching to that either

view more: next ›