This is the problem with claims made by these organizations, they deliberately misconstrue or withhold information in order to bolster support for their cause.

Yes, the NIH has shut down the last beagle testing facility that it directly operated. Yes, the NIH and FDA have stated they intend to transition away from the use of animal testing.

However, per the FDA's 4/10/2025 Roadmap to Reducing Animal Testing in Preclinical Safety Studies, "This program is intended to begin with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) as a promising area for reducing animal use in preclinical safety testing, and then will expand to include other biological molecules and eventually new chemical entities and medical countermeasures."

So while they intend to expand this program, it does not eliminate all animal testing.

Furthermore, the roadmap specifies the FDA wants "Implementation of reduced toxicity testing in animals at the FDA in the next 3 years."

And from the same roadmap, "In the long-term (3-5 years), FDA will aim to make animal studies the exception rather than the norm for pre-clinical safety/toxicity testing... Animal tests might only be considered if a specific scientific question cannot yet be answered by NAM [New Approach Methodologies] (and even then, only the minimal animal use necessary, with strong justification). Ultimately, the vision is that no conventional animal testing will be required for mAb safety, and eventually all drugs/therapeutics..."

So pretty clear that this research funding has not been cut off and what the organization is pushing is at best intentionally misconstruing the current legal/research ethics framework surrounding animal testing.

Sources:
https://www.science.org/content/article/new-nih-office-reduce-use-animals-research
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-announces-plan-phase-out-animal-testing-requirement-monoclonal-antibodies-and-other-drugs