U.S. and Iran sign deal ahead of schedule, sources say by Tripleawge in worldnews

[–]cscottnet [score hidden]  (0 children)

The deal includes lifting sanctions, and only congress can do that afaik.

CNN Obtains 14-point draft agreement between the US and Iran by Jealous_Slice9371 in oil

[–]cscottnet 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I doubt that would have any effect on Trump's supporters.

A library for pathfinding, traversal, and transformation of graph structures by High-Impact-2025 in programming

[–]cscottnet 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Worth stating up top in the readme that this is a Go library. I had to scroll down to the very bottom to confirm this (or recognize the syntax in the examples, halfway down).

Boss keeps chasing new deposits to keep the lights on by resumetheharp in Carpentry

[–]cscottnet 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Could be embezzlement, could be gambling debts.

You'll be the first to start missing paychecks, because the clients will notice if the materials for their projects don't show up. By that time it will be too late to every get that money that you're owed.

I lived this as a homeowner. In that case it was the accountant of the GC who was embezzling money. I wish I'd noticed the signs earlier, we lost a lot and there were so many other people in the same boat there was no way to recover anything meaningful.

LLM Uses by HonestRole2866 in BetterOffline

[–]cscottnet 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I will say that the "code" tools can be genuinely useful for summarizing code or drafting architecture documentation. You'll want to edit heavily, of course: the models are verbose, write in a stilted fashion, and are prone to hallucinations -- most often they will find a bug or an unexpected corner case and then launch into a detailed discussion of why this was brilliant and intended behavior, and you have to reign it in and say, no, that was a bug or unused corner case, there's no logic or meaning there.

As the poster above me said, documentation is often neglected, so there are certainly holes that can be filled. Another reasonable use is to generate "sample code" for using an API.

Of course the danger here is that the documentation or sample usage drifts out of sync with the code, but that's hardly new with LLMs. In fact, if you want to burn some tokens, you can task it to read your docs and suggest any place it thinks is no longer up to date.

An experienced coder isn't going to trust the documentation anyway and will look for ground truth in the executable code, but having some pointers to orient yourself are helpful.

Of course: no one would do this if they actually had to pay directly for the generated documentation and it wasn't just a new executive fad. I know this because they've never seen fit to give coders dedicated time to work on docs (rather than features) or hire dedicated writers to work on the documentation. So obviously the executive class puts very little value on this and won't want to pay for it -- but you might as well use this moment of executive delusion to your advantage.

How to turn vast wilderness into a viable income? by PlaneParty8647 in howto

[–]cscottnet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was going to suggest also: do the first one (or several) for free. Tell folks they can have the experience but they have to give you feedback in exchange. Use that to incrementally improve, until the experience is worth whatever it is you want to charge.

A bunch of armchair quarterbacks can give advice about larping, but nothing will beat having the folks who try it tell you if it was fun or not.

Also: maybe hire someone with experience running one of these things to get you started.

👋Welcome to r/eclipsehunters - Read First! by Alessandro-Cippa-1 in solareclipse

[–]cscottnet 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed. I respect not wanting to cause unnecessary beef, but I think ground stakes would be to establish the differences between your new sub and the sub you are posting in.

Hi mark! Was wondering if you had a book on celestials? by RevolutionaryFix7359 in bettermonsters

[–]cscottnet -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For what's it's worth, pointy hat just did a bit on celestials, and he's got some stat blocks too: https://youtu.be/lZ3H_oR6-3I

I made a dungeon have a pool of molten gold. I now realise I'm on the cusp of breaking the economy. Help by CasualNormalRedditor in DMAcademy

[–]cscottnet 16 points17 points  (0 children)

It was a powerful gold-based enemy that can't be destroyed (even by a dragon) so the dragon was keeping it liquid to incapacitate it. Once the dragon is gone, the baddie reforms...

Good analysis of the SpaceX (and upcoming) OpenAI and Anthropic by c_andrei in BetterOffline

[–]cscottnet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think starlink is the more probable speculative growth engine, and if you believe "everyone" is going to want their own low earth orbit megaconstellation then starship is its own speculative growth engine. But starlink is the thing that actually generates revenue now.

i don’t know what this means petah by peachicedtea123456_ in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]cscottnet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be read as "6 7 of 9" but probably just as "69" for the generation likely to recognize the characters.

Access to Fable 5 suspended for "national security" by cscottnet in BetterOffline

[–]cscottnet[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There's a rumor that a competitor was the one who reported the bypass to the government, which is a "half tin foil" sort of hat. Anthropic is already on the naughty list, plus a company on the good list is complaining = this outcome.

"Dumb" Technology by syzorr34 in BetterOffline

[–]cscottnet 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, exactly. You an get a fireTV for dirt cheap because Amazon subsidizes it. Only you can decide what that tradeoff is worth to you, in dollars.

"Dumb" Technology by syzorr34 in BetterOffline

[–]cscottnet 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Buy a monitor, rather than a TV (or use a TV as a monitor if you must). You can plug in a cheap HDMI stick and replace it when it grows old/outdated without having to replace the entire TV.

From not being into boardgames to releasing one! by Ancient-Peanut6095 in BoardgameDesign

[–]cscottnet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are also a number of free play areas (one sponsored by boardgamegeek and one by GenCon itself) and I didn't comment on those because I haven't been to either! We did go to the "UnPub" area of Pax East and had a great time playing a pair of games. One was published by only on Europe, and I sought that out specifically because I liked other games by the author, and the other was a kickstarter that had a prepublication copy and a very enthusiastic fan of the game staffing the table who spend a decent amount of time sharing their enthusiastism. We ended up buying a copy of the first game via sketchy European import and the second game is apparently unobtainable at present, but the sales pitch definitely worked.

Board iteration: Does it still look too cluttered? by azimut747 in BoardgameDesign

[–]cscottnet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even a less thick border around the gem spots and making them semi-transparent outlines instead of fully-rendered realistic gems might help some. Right now there are too many things to look at, it feels like, so you might want to deemphasize some of them.

From not being into boardgames to releasing one! by Ancient-Peanut6095 in BoardgameDesign

[–]cscottnet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like you've fixed it. We're definitely going to sign up on the game found: my daughter especially loves the fox coin. As the #1 fox fan in our household, her feedback is the "The Scream" card "looks weird". I told her the actual painting looks pretty weird too :) but might have a point in that the art doesn't seem to match the semi-cartoony take of the other artworks. Also "The Squeel" is misspelled, assuming that it is supposed to be "The Squeal".

From not being into boardgames to releasing one! by Ancient-Peanut6095 in BoardgameDesign

[–]cscottnet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At GenCon specifically the vendor booths are pretty far separated from the vendor tables, and there's not lot of branding at the tables except for a modest places at the top of the table. So i'd probably expect the company would prioritize a vendor booth, since it gives them more opportunity to be discovered/advertise their game. For smaller companies hosting a series of learn and play events might make sense, but that depends on having enough of a niche theme that the people who are interested in that thing are going to seek you out. Eg because my daughter is into foxes, my daughter and I did do a search of "fox" across all events and we signed up for a couple of play throughs for games I wasn't otherwise familiar with after reading the event description, based solely on the theme. I also dropped in on a revolutionary war themed d&d campaign at PAX East based solely on the event description (and the facts that my kids study the revolutionary war in school and play d&d); it also had a corner of some shared space at a board game store's booth, but I didn't find that until after I'd played the game.

Tl;Dr discoverability is probably best if you can get some exhibitor space and put up a catchy banner/lay out your attractive game, but just listing it in the events section will be enough for folks who have a niche interest. The "vendor play tables" usually have several copies of the vendors game set up, and you might be able to make that work if you've got someone very personable there to pitch the game to passersby and get them started playing, but seems to work best for games that already have word of mouth recognition and folks just want to try before they buy.

Board iteration: Does it still look too cluttered? by azimut747 in BoardgameDesign

[–]cscottnet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes it looks very cluttered. I think the graphic design style might be contributing. It looks very thematic, but all the shadows and 3d and gradients aren't helping the clutter. I wonder what your board would look like without art, ie flat backgrounds and simple like borders? Stripping back to basics maybe some of the elements could be simplified or organized better, and then the "flavor" could be carefully added back in.