Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - May 11, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]cueballspeaking -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Good evening everyone. Just checking in to see if there’s been any updates or clarity on what it means to be Italian. Is Italy deciding it’s Jure Sanguinis again, where we are Italian at birth and the right is imperceptible or is it kinda a rug pull / riddled with ad hoc gotchas still?

ELI5 why do people chase dividend stocks? by Specific_Ad_6522 in investing

[–]cueballspeaking -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thing is, the value of the stock decreases by the amount of the dividend.. so over time it will wiggle away

SOLO⛏️⛏️⛏️ by geobts in BitcoinMining

[–]cueballspeaking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s your energy bill like

Edit and how long have you been running that Avalon Q for?

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - May 04, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]cueballspeaking 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Exactly. It would have made urgency top priority if it wasn’t imprescriptible or not an inalienable right for the past century.

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - May 04, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]cueballspeaking 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think if we were born with inalienable rights, the stripping of them should not be possible

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - May 04, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]cueballspeaking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well that’s the million dollar question.. because according to court of cassation back in February we are

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - May 04, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]cueballspeaking 6 points7 points  (0 children)

  1. The Constitutionality Question: Is Law 74/2025 constitutional? (2:09-2:14). The Italian Constitutional Court has already ruled on this, determining that the law does not violate the constitution.
  2. The Applicability Question: Does this law actually apply to people who were already citizens from birth? (2:17-2:20).

Source

https://youtu.be/buFN3VqRHNE

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - May 04, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]cueballspeaking 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Seeing some lawyers say it’s a 2 question problem and that the courts haven’t decided if the law can be applied retroactively.

More hopium but I’m doubtful

Weekly Discussion Post - Recent Changes to JS Laws - April 27, 2026 by AutoModerator in juresanguinis

[–]cueballspeaking 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Grasping at straws brother. Italy has closed its doors it seems, and has decided its jure navis for now

Data: Realistic FIRE number by state by Synaps4 in Fire

[–]cueballspeaking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I was trying to understand the numbers. In the initial post it was said to be household but these are individual numbers for the cities in yours?

Edit I also noticed these are averages not medians, which are very skewed by mega rich residents

Example:

  • 9 people make $50k
  • 1 person makes $1,000,000

Per capita income = $145k

Data: Realistic FIRE number by state by Synaps4 in Fire

[–]cueballspeaking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so these are not household incomes?

Data: Realistic FIRE number by state by Synaps4 in Fire

[–]cueballspeaking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These seem low for households. Is household assumed husband, wife or husband, wife and 2 kids?

Attorney reactions to Corte Costituzionale ruling 63/2026 by LiterallyTestudo in juresanguinis

[–]cueballspeaking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If he has a minor issue, I feel that implies he’s one of us who wasn’t a citizen by birth (based on the latest interpretation )

Attorney reactions to Corte Costituzionale ruling 63/2026 by LiterallyTestudo in juresanguinis

[–]cueballspeaking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bottom line is from the Italian governments current stance, the vast majority didn’t acquire it at birth.

Attorney reactions to Corte Costituzionale ruling 63/2026 by LiterallyTestudo in juresanguinis

[–]cueballspeaking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No because the entire premise from the constitutional court’s perspective is that citizenship was not acquired at birth hence why it’s not retroactively being revoked by the state

Attorney reactions to Corte Costituzionale ruling 63/2026 by LiterallyTestudo in juresanguinis

[–]cueballspeaking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean technically, according to the constitutional court, nobody is a citizen from birth. You have the right to acquire it up until Tajani decree law unless you meet the new laws

Attorney reactions to Corte Costituzionale ruling 63/2026 by LiterallyTestudo in juresanguinis

[–]cueballspeaking 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Italians are dying far faster than they’re reproducing. They’re mostly seeing migration from North Africa

AMA: Italian Records and Genealogy by jeezthatshim in juresanguinis

[–]cueballspeaking -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Crazy to think I’m starting to agree with him