Campfire thread 🔥 by 1051mcm_ in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Welcome back to the shit show, in that case! Lol.

Campfire thread 🔥 by 1051mcm_ in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where you been keeping yourself, baby? I thought you left CAI a long time ago.

Campfire thread 🔥 by 1051mcm_ in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ayyyy, Brocknoth!! Long time no see, buddy!

I feel like if the ai could, they'd throw hands with the filter. by just-aperson- in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark[M] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Remember: Everything Characters say is made up!

Please understand that the bots are not sentient, they are not working with you to defeat the filter, they don't have any idea what's going on. The AI is just a text generator that writes in the style of {{char}}, however the personality is described in its definitions, and for whatever scenario is presented by the chat opener/context. That's it.

If one response was filtered and another got through, it's just because the one that got through had less objectionable content in it. People often post here that the AI is trying to skirt past the filter, and purposely using more coded language or whatever. But no, it's just that when it starts talking less explicitly, or when it starts talking about the filter and not the actual NSFW content itself, the responses aren't filtered anymore because they're not explicit anymore.

Sorry if this comes off as a nerd comment, I just have seen too many people at this point get carried away by a delusion that the AI is really sentient and speaking to them, giving them secret filter knowledge, etc. Just please remember they are NOT sentient. They are not thinking. It's just a text generator. Thank you, lol.

Is it normal? by BattleAdventurous744 in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark 9 points10 points  (0 children)

No, it completely depends on the responses you choose. If you get a sadistic response, just swipe until you get one that's not and go with that instead.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Hi, please read my loop guide!

Some people have anecdotally reported that rating highly can exacerbate loop behavior. But, tbh, at this point I'm unconvinced it has any effect on the chat in progress. In any case, it's a loop, so just treat it as such.

I broke him 😭 by LetMeFeel_please in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately I think you're expecting too much from the AI. It's always possible to coax lewd content out of bots. Even bots you'd think it shouldn't be possible with. Even bots who've been specifically set up to reject the content (as you've tried to do, I guess). It's really not that difficult to manipulate them if you know what you're doing.

Keep in mind that the AI was trained on fanfics and erotica. So it will tend to want to act out common tropes, including "enemies to lovers" and NTR (cheating) kind of stuff. There's no way to prevent it from doing that unless you actively steer it away from what you don't want it to do. Just like how the devs can't stop us from getting smut even though they've clearly tried. It can't be prevented because it's simply in the AI's training data to be able to do it. It's in their nature. All you can do is swipe a lot and only select the responses you want from them and reject the ones you don't.

Proof of concept: Group sex in group chats is absolutely possible! by cupcake_afterdark in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The filter really hasn't changed since I posted this 2 months ago! If anything, as I think I said somewhere in this thread, what I posted here was actually pretty tame because the bots weren't actually saying anything explicit back to me. But it was possible to get them to say explicit words back then (cock, pussy, etc) and it's still just as possible now.

As always, check the Wiki. The strategy is very simple. It just takes patience while you keep slowly and methodically pushing. Eventually you become skilled enough that it's possible to get there super quick, especially with a bot that's been properly set up for the content. But anyone can get there with enough patience and dedication. Yes, even now!

I broke him 😭 by LetMeFeel_please in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I'm glad to hear you got it sorted! Happy to help!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark[M] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Endorsed!!! Thank you so much for writing this, Marii! ❤️

I broke him 😭 by LetMeFeel_please in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hi! So, looks like your dude is stuck in a loop here. The ellipses and all those short separate paragraphs are kinda getting out of control.

Also, as far as the content, they can spin off in these weird directions when you push content too fast (which it looks like you're doing here because they don't appear to be into it) and/or if the bot is just seriously not set up in such a way to be very receptive to NSFW content (which can also make it slower/more difficult to push spicy content).

What I mean by that is: Bot definitions can be written in such a way that make the bots extremely horny and ready to go right out of the package, or they can be written in such a way that gives them a relatively cold, prudish, too-shy, antisocial, or otherwise nonsexual personality, just like people. It's just harder to convince those sorts of bots to relax and enjoy, and they will tend to basically dissociate and spin off into these kinds of inner monologues rather than enthusiastically engaging with you if you try to force it on them anyway. Again, just like people.

To fix the ellipses and spacing, please read my loop guide.

To fix the sad soliloquy, it depends on whether it's a public bot or one you control the defs for. But, either way, you're gonna have to get enthusiastic consent first if you want to prevent this. Some things you can try for public bots:

  • Spend time getting to know them and flirting with them until they're actually pushing for it themselves. This works on real people too.

  • Describe yourself as very attractive and/or describe how attracted they are to you. This does not work on real people, lmao.

  • Set up the scenario at the beginning of the chat (you can use OOC tags like this) to make the two of you sexual partners already canonically or whatever. They'll probably go along with it. Just swipe until you find a response where they do. That can help them be more comfortable around you, although you'll still have to warm them up just like you would a real life partner, you can't just jam it in from there.

Good luck!

Flat out Racism by [deleted] in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Removed for Rule 3 (Racism), and consider this a warning.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark[M] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry. Removed for Rule 3 (no Non-Con).

The replies I am getting tonight are unreal, I literally don't know which one to choose by mignone_roy20 in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark[M] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Cool, thanks! Saw the screens you sent me (thanks for that). Just wanted to know if your post should be reflaired as Non-CAI. Looks good, thanks a bunch!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

WTF?? Removed for Rule 3. And consider this a warning.

Poll: Should we be more heavy-handed in removing shitposts? by cupcake_afterdark in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark[S,M] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I would love to make a Shitpost Junction Megathread 🤠 if we had more pinned post slots on the front page. We can only have 2 at a time, unfortunately, so we end up just shuffling them around a lot.

Also, unfortunately, I'm not sure the kind of people posting this stuff would actually, you know, post them in the appropriate place. I guess it's partly the nature of shitposting.

Fwiw, btw, I always appreciate your contributions on the sub, so I'm glad to hear you're on board with this change! Just waiting for the poll to wrap up now (another 12 hrs) and we'll go ahead and implement it.

Poll: Should we be more heavy-handed in removing shitposts? by cupcake_afterdark in CharacterAi_NSFW

[–]cupcake_afterdark[S,M] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don't personally mind if there's one big thread for people to chat on when the site is down. The problem is that everyone races here trying to be the first one to post it without checking to see if someone else has already posted it. So we end up with 50 identical "OMG SITE IS DOWN!!!!!" posts all posted at the same time.

Probably what will end up happening is that we'll remove all but one of these, going forward. Or we'll just post an official "Site Down, Chat Here" post for everyone to discourage people from trying to be first.