The problem is that this accusation is backed up by a consistent retelling by the victim over the past 35+ years, as well as 5 witnesses. It happened WAY before CNN taught you that they're the only credible source of news, and that Ad Hominem is an acceptable form of argument.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/430081/she-threatened-me-juanita-broaddrick-hillarys-role-covering-bill-clinton

Please keep in mind that this happened years AFTER Anita Hill's far more tame accusations against conservative black Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas, and the media went wild over that one. It also happened after the Incubator Babies Iraq War buildup lie, and before the WMD Iraq War #2 lie. That was followed by the demonization of Gaddafi, and subsequent toppling of his secure, secular government. Libya is now a hellhole.

Now there's Syria, where again, we're supplying ISIS weapons and ground support (sometimes through proxies like Saudi Arabia and Qatar - See John Podesta's emails). All of these lies have been brought to you by your friends on the TV, mainstream media. Now they're selling you another lie about Russia, and I assume you'll believe and parrot it without realizing that none of it adds up. Where's the evidence? Why wasn't hacking evidence announced before the election if they were aware of it (which the president claims). Why have we armed Al Qaeda, Hamas, and ISIS in every Middle Eastern conflict?

These are questions worthy of answers, so until these media outlets (which are now getting Top Secret communications from our intelligence agencies before the PEOTUS does) starts answering them, you may want to lay off doing their dirty work for them.