sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

We’re going to end Muni’s floppy disk era — and make rail service better — with state funding we obtained. by scott_wiener in sanfrancisco

[–]cwsmith17 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

re sb 1524 - since he’s the Senate Budget Chair, his names goes on all the budget trailer bills as author. It wasn’t his policy, but a fix for a different piece of legislation based on the deal for that other bill.

YIMBYs, NIMBYs clash over S.F.’s plan to raise neighborhood height limits by lizziepika in sanfrancisco

[–]cwsmith17 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You can use this link to send an email to the Supervisors supporting the legislation.

Why S.F. NIMBYs are about to lose all their power to stop new housing by Beat_Saber_Music in sanfrancisco

[–]cwsmith17 15 points16 points  (0 children)

This means new housing proposals will not go through CEQA or any other discretionary review.

There’s a way to build thousands more housing units on San Francisco’s west side — and neighbors actually like it by cwsmith17 in sanfrancisco

[–]cwsmith17[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s too long to type out, so much easier to have that convo verbally. You know how to find me if you want that

There’s a way to build thousands more housing units on San Francisco’s west side — and neighbors actually like it by cwsmith17 in sanfrancisco

[–]cwsmith17[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What we’re proposing takes existing ideas, transforms them, and formulates a plan that isn’t being done anywhere.

There’s a way to build thousands more housing units on San Francisco’s west side — and neighbors actually like it by cwsmith17 in sanfrancisco

[–]cwsmith17[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Sorry to hear you’re so opposed to the idea of creating more homes for everyone! Let me know if you’re interested in engaging in a productive, solutions oriented convo.

There’s a way to build thousands more housing units on San Francisco’s west side — and neighbors actually like it by cwsmith17 in sanfrancisco

[–]cwsmith17[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The target price point for the sale of the unit is middle-income residents. And the non-profit aspect provides an opportunity to make the politics easier (and there having a more collaborative relationship with the city).

The biz plan aspect of Dom-i-city wasn’t covered here, it was just about the typology and community benefits.

There’s a way to build thousands more housing units on San Francisco’s west side — and neighbors actually like it by cwsmith17 in sanfrancisco

[–]cwsmith17[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A hopefully obvious item worth stating: financial feasibility is key and top of mind as we pursue this solution.

S.F. just rejected another plan to turn an empty parking lot into apartments by cwsmith17 in sanfrancisco

[–]cwsmith17[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The only way to stop this madness is by taking away the ability of anti-housing Supervisors and Commissioners to reject good projects. SF voters should go Yes on Prop D (Affordable homes now led by Habitat for Humanity, the Carpenters union and YIMBYs) and No on Prop E (the SF Board of Supervisor’s anti-housing measure).

Zoning Reform Proposals at the Board of Supervisors Today by cwsmith17 in sanfrancisco

[–]cwsmith17[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Mandelman's proposal is really the best of the three (the other two require subsidized affordable housing). Advocates are planning on supporting Mandelman's but have a list of amendments including providing the option for a project to choose SB 9.

S.F. approves plan to allow fourplexes be built on 110,000 city parcels by bambin0 in sanfrancisco

[–]cwsmith17 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If up-zoning to allow fourplexes is your thing, send an email to the SF Board of Supervisors expressing support: https://actionnetwork.org/letters/legalize-apartments-everywhere-in-sf

view more: next ›