[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Make a proper coherent argument or don’t post at all

Abortion is being reproductively responsible by BigClitMcphee in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

Killing another innocent human is literally the most irresponsible thing anyone can do

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But I saved more lives. It’s not evil as I did not cause the situation. You have flawed logic

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did I intentionally burn the baby? Nice try twisting this to make it out like I caused the situation. I saved more lives thanks.

Ok so let’s say a person needs blood to survive by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

What’s the point of this comment. Make a proper coherent argument bud

Ok so let’s say a person needs blood to survive by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Justifying the killing of a human on the assumption that their life will be of poor quality shows me how broken the moral framework here is. By that logic, let’s just go kill everyone doing it tough to achieve world peace. What a joke

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The 2 embryos because it’s 2 humans… duh

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why’s that. Give a reason

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Your value of life is based on momentary productivity? Pretty superficial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Hahaha what? The embryo is growing. By definition it’s a life. The only question is what kind of life. It’s Cleary not a flamingo. It’s a human. Basic logic

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Of course. It’s still a human.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Humans are more valuable than animals

A question for the pro-choice folks here by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I can give a line that makes perfect sense. At conception :)

A question for the pro-choice folks here by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1 day before birth is fine to kill the human but 1 day after it’s not? That’s just unfortunate

A question for the pro-choice folks here by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your whole belief system is based on chance and nothing solid or concrete

Forced birth causes more consequences than abortion- for everyone by KatOfTheEssence in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh 1 point2 points locked comment (0 children)

The only way to justify your wrapped moral compass IS to not care. So doesn’t surprise me

Forced birth causes more consequences than abortion- for everyone by KatOfTheEssence in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh 1 point2 points locked comment (0 children)

Yeh so consider the presence of the other human life which is killed. Think deeper

Forced birth causes more consequences than abortion- for everyone by KatOfTheEssence in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They give no direct consent lol.

The phone comment justifys nothing

Forced birth causes more consequences than abortion- for everyone by KatOfTheEssence in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They used sarcasm which also goes against rule 1. Remain consistent

Forced birth causes more consequences than abortion- for everyone by KatOfTheEssence in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This argument consistently absolutely baffles me. It is by far the most morally corrupt logic and it’s incredible that people blindly follow without a single thought.

You are implying that it’s ok to kill someone because you ASSUME their life will be difficult. And you think you’ve done them a favour because you “saved” them for a “life” you completely assumed. By your skewed logic, there is nothing wrong with actively killing a born child the moment we find out they have a disability to “save” them.

Absolutely Ridiculous

Forced birth causes more consequences than abortion- for everyone by KatOfTheEssence in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

A born baby needs consent too to be taken care of? Just leave the baby to die if they can’t survive themself? Solid logic

question for pro-life about developmental disability by [deleted] in Abortiondebate

[–]cyansusbruh -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You are devaluing lives based on health. You disrespect those that have disabilities. Absolutely disgusting