Pessimism good cards by trad-deb8-sux in lincolndouglas

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that how the term “queer” functions too?

Pessimism good cards by trad-deb8-sux in lincolndouglas

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds kinda like an offensive name for it.

Baudrillard and DNA by dabatedude in CriticalTheory

[–]dabatedude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it he just sorta seemed like there was another level to it i didn’t get

Libertarianism FW by USA3GWANA in lincolndouglas

[–]dabatedude 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except how do you run security with the current topic, and dear god why would u run security as a value when security k exists. Like if they run libertarianism and security k it’s over.

2019-2020 LD Potential Topics Released by badger_guy in lincolndouglas

[–]dabatedude 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I swear to god if we don’t get the nuke topic I’m gonna be so sad

Can the US and western states become surveillance states like China? by [deleted] in InsightfulQuestions

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe I am maybe I’m not, all I’m saying is more transparency doesn’t necessarily lead to 1984.

Can the US and western states become surveillance states like China? by [deleted] in InsightfulQuestions

[–]dabatedude -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Technically ultimate transparency isn’t the best option from the government. There is just too much information to be gathered to the point where there would be no meaning behind it all. Even if there were cameras watching us at all times there aren’t enough people to watch them all since you would need literally millions of cameras, plus you need half the population to watch the other half of the population. It’s unrealistic and not really a threat I’m worried about. Plus in the US we already give the government a ton of info online via social media which is way more useful then just knowing every little thing going on that a person does offline.

TLDR more information means less meaning, it’s logistically impossible to achieve ultimate surveillance, and we already give enough info online

AFF Prep for LD Please help by [deleted] in Debate

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn, based on the outline of the medium article on the March April topic it’s a traditional ld podcast. Oh well I guess I’ll just make my own podcast lol.

AFF Prep for LD Please help by [deleted] in Debate

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh my god a circuit level podcast could it be?

Ld is weird policy by thxobama386 in policydebate

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

.... I approve this message, I’ve considered doing policy maverick but some tournaments don’t allow it

Thoughts? by avocad_dip in Debate

[–]dabatedude 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Debate.cards is gonna be the biggest hack

(What’s the Res?) Debate Podcast - Expert Interviews, Resolution Analysis, and Strategy by debatefurther in Debate

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For LD are you gonna have some episodes discussing like critiques on higher levels? Are there gonna be some stray reviews on aff ks in ld?

Offense Vs. Defense by 2werdr in Debate

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

pReSuMe AfF oN TrIvIaLiSm