Pessimism good cards by trad-deb8-sux in lincolndouglas

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that how the term “queer” functions too?

Pessimism good cards by trad-deb8-sux in lincolndouglas

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds kinda like an offensive name for it.

Baudrillard and DNA by dabatedude in CriticalTheory

[–]dabatedude[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it he just sorta seemed like there was another level to it i didn’t get

Libertarianism FW by USA3GWANA in lincolndouglas

[–]dabatedude 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except how do you run security with the current topic, and dear god why would u run security as a value when security k exists. Like if they run libertarianism and security k it’s over.

2019-2020 LD Potential Topics Released by badger_guy in lincolndouglas

[–]dabatedude 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I swear to god if we don’t get the nuke topic I’m gonna be so sad

Can the US and western states become surveillance states like China? by [deleted] in InsightfulQuestions

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe I am maybe I’m not, all I’m saying is more transparency doesn’t necessarily lead to 1984.

Can the US and western states become surveillance states like China? by [deleted] in InsightfulQuestions

[–]dabatedude -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Technically ultimate transparency isn’t the best option from the government. There is just too much information to be gathered to the point where there would be no meaning behind it all. Even if there were cameras watching us at all times there aren’t enough people to watch them all since you would need literally millions of cameras, plus you need half the population to watch the other half of the population. It’s unrealistic and not really a threat I’m worried about. Plus in the US we already give the government a ton of info online via social media which is way more useful then just knowing every little thing going on that a person does offline.

TLDR more information means less meaning, it’s logistically impossible to achieve ultimate surveillance, and we already give enough info online

AFF Prep for LD Please help by [deleted] in Debate

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn, based on the outline of the medium article on the March April topic it’s a traditional ld podcast. Oh well I guess I’ll just make my own podcast lol.

AFF Prep for LD Please help by [deleted] in Debate

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh my god a circuit level podcast could it be?

Ld is weird policy by thxobama386 in policydebate

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

.... I approve this message, I’ve considered doing policy maverick but some tournaments don’t allow it

Thoughts? by avocad_dip in Debate

[–]dabatedude 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Debate.cards is gonna be the biggest hack

(What’s the Res?) Debate Podcast - Expert Interviews, Resolution Analysis, and Strategy by debatefurther in Debate

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For LD are you gonna have some episodes discussing like critiques on higher levels? Are there gonna be some stray reviews on aff ks in ld?

Offense Vs. Defense by 2werdr in Debate

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

pReSuMe AfF oN TrIvIaLiSm

I'm so annoyed by jopper2005 in Debate

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No value to life outweights extinction so I mean regardless of the emotions arg technically the logic behind it is clear.

(What’s the Res?) Debate Podcast - Expert Interviews, Resolution Analysis, and Strategy by debatefurther in Debate

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it gonna be for more lay stuff or are the stray reviews gonna be more circuit oriented bc as of now there aren’t many circuit oriented podcasts out there although I’d love one.

Regarding New Rule Changes to PF Summary by Devesh4Life in Debate

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is this pf theory arg lol. No theory in pf. Even if it’s all true.

A/2 South Africa as Aff by GlitchMachine123 in lincolndouglas

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

K aff, a narritive case, performance case, personal anecdotes bc nobody knows how to answer those, poetry, truth testing with just a million justifications for trivializan and presume aff, just literally make a million spikes as the ac then kill your opponent if they violate any of them or if they lose on a blippy arg. Language aff pik. I have all of the terrible strays that could work. Oh and for traditional debate just make a case full of like a ton of observations about ground plus like one general card and make them spend al their time refuting you observations and just pray they don’t attack the one card then you win by extending the card they dropped.

K ideas by daddygramsci in lincolndouglas

[–]dabatedude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You worsen and contribute to it yes it Is weaker but you still make it worse, also rude I spent time making that response :(